Combination OZURDEX® & EyLea® vs. OZURDEX® Monotherapy in IncompLete-Responders wIth Diabetic Macular Edema (COLLIDE)

November 11, 2019 updated by: Pradeepa Yoganathan

Combination OZURDEX® & EyLea® vs. OZURDEX® Monotherapy in IncompLete-Responders wIth Diabetic Macular Edema (COLLIDE)

COLLIDE is a multi-center, open-label, 1:1 randomized study looking at the effects of aflibercept (AFL; 2.0mg) plus OZURDEX (DEX; 0.7mg) implant combination therapy versus DEX monotherapy in phakic or pseudophakic eyes with center-involved DME that have demonstrated prior incomplete response to 3-6 anti-VEGF treatment in 3-9 months. The primary outcome will be 24 week central subfield thickness. Secondary outcomes include the change in ETDRS BCVA letters, number of re-injections and re-injection interval, proportion of eyes with 15- and 10- ETDRS letter gained/lost, proportion of eyes with PDR as per Optos color and FA at the study completion (24+/- 2 weeks) and OCT and OCT angiography biomarkers.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common cause of vision loss in patients with diabetes. The pathophysiology of DME is complex and likely multifactorial, where some of the most important features include the accumulation of advanced glycation end products, reactive oxygen species, protein kinase C and diacylglyceride activation, up-regulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Additionally, inflammation has also been identified as an important etiological factor because breakdown of the retinal pigment epithelium - a physiologic barrier to fluid flow from the choriocapillaris and active retinal fluid pump, has been linked to increased levels of pro-inflammatory mediators including VEGF and processes that support leukostasis.

In Canada, LUCENTIS® (0.5 mg ranibizumab or RBZ, an anti-neovascular VEGF-A inhibitor, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.) was the first approved medical treatment for DME. Health Canada's decision for regulatory approval of RBZ (0.5 mg) for treatment of DME was based on 12-month results from the RESOLVE (Phase II trial investigating RBZ (0.3 mg or 0.5 mg) vs. sham injection) and RESTORE (Phase IIIb trial investigating RBZ (0.5 mg) + sham laser or RBZ (0.5 mg) + laser vs. laser + sham injection) trials. In the RESOLVE trial, pooled RBZ treatment arms resulted in significant and continuous improvement compared to sham treatment in both BCVA (mean improvement of 7.8 letters with RBZ treatment compared to a mean decline of 0.1 letters with sham treatment) and CRT (mean reduction of -194.2 µm with RBZ treatment vs. -48.4±153.4 µm with sham treatment). Similarly in the RESTORE trial, RBZ monotherapy and RBZ treatment with adjunctive laser yielded a statistically significantly greater mean average change in BCVA letter score compared to laser monotherapy through 12-months of study (+6.1 and +5.9 vs. +0.8 BCVA letters, respectively) along with a significantly greater improvement in CRT change from baseline vs. laser (-118.7 µm and -128.3 µm vs. -61.3 µm, respectively). Additionally, RBZ treatment arms in both RESOLVE and RESTORE demonstrated comparable safety with controls permitting conclusions that RBZ 0.5 mg is well-tolerated in the management of DME.

Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) published in 2015 their Protocol T: Comparison of RBZ with Eylea (Aflibercept or AFL, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals) and Avastin (Bevacizumab or BCZ, Roche) in DME. At 1 year, the patients treated with AFL had a statistically improved visual acuity of 13.3 letters as compared to BCZ (9.7 letters) and RBZ (11.2 letters). The same cohort of AFL treated DME had greater improvement on Ocular Coherence Tomography central subfield thickness with 169 micron change vs 101 um with BCZ and 147 um with RBZ. However, in all treatment arms, a large number of patients 46% required rescue laser therapy as per study protocol.

While anti-VEGF agents are a mainstay for the management of DME, a subgroup of eyes having partial or incomplete response to AVASTIN® (bevacizumab or BCZ), EYLEA® (intravitreal aflibercept injection or AFL) and RBZ exist.

RISE and RIDE, two phase III trials for registration of RBZ in the USA randomized DME patients on a basis of 1:1:1 to receive monthly 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg RBZ intravitreal treatments or sham injections over 24 months. Upon completion of the 24-month study (time point for primary efficacy outcome, namely the proportion of patients gaining ≥ 15 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters in BCVA from baseline), patients within the sham arm were eligible to receive delayed monthly 0.5 mg RBZ treatments over the next 12 months. Although strong vision gains were observed in patients originally randomized to RBZ arms at month 24 and sustained through month 36, sham controls receiving delayed RBZ treatment had vision improvements to a lesser extent than those receiving continuous RBZ treatment throughout the 36 month study, thereby suggesting benefits with initiation of DME treatment early in the course of DME management.

In a prospective study comparing the efficacy of monthly BCZ (1.5 mg) vs. monthly RBZ (0.5 mg) in eyes with baseline center-involved DME > 300 µm, Nepomuceno and colleagues reported 59% and 37% of eyes had persistent DME (> 275 µm) by week 48. Moreover, 28% and 14% of BCZ- and RBZ-treated eyes qualified for rescue therapy, respectively.

Results from the phase 3 VIVID and VISTA trials demonstrated that 42% eyes with central involved DME treated with Eylea (Aflibercept) 2.0 mg administered either every 4 or 8 weeks (after 5 initial monthly doses) failed to achieve 2-lines of vision gain.

In the RESOLVE and RESTORE trials there were 39.2% and 59.7% of RBZ-treated eyes that respectively failed to achieve 2-lines of vision gain at 12 months of study, while in RISE and RIDE, 23% of patients had CRT >250 µm and 40% of patients failed to achieve a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥ 20/40 despite 2 years of monthly RBZ injections.

Adjunctive treatment regimens that offer ability to resolve DME and improve vision in eyes with incomplete response to anti-VEGF monotherapy will be of great value. Given that the treatment effects observed with delayed treatment in RISE and RIDE were less than that seen in the continuous (early) RBZ treatment arms, one may reason it is beneficial to readily identify eyes with incomplete response to anti-VEGF monotherapy to best allow functional vision improvement with an effective adjunctive treatment option.

Intravitreal corticosteroids may be useful in the treatment of DME because they block production of VEGF and other inflammatory mediators, inhibit leukostasis, and enhance the barrier function of vascular endothelial cell tight junctions. Off-label treatment with IVTA has been shown to be more effective than placebo in improving vision in patients with refractory DME. Sustained-release corticosteroids have been developed to reduce the need for frequent retreatments associated with anti-VEGF monotherapy regimens.

OZURDEX® (DEX implant; Allergan Inc. Irvine, CA, USA) is a sustained-release biodegradable implant approved for treatment of ME following central retinal vein occlusion, non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment and pseudophakic DME in adult patients. DEX implant releases the corticosteroid dexamethasone, which possesses 5-6 times greater anti-inflammatory potency than triamcinolone, into the vitreous over a period of 6 months. In previous studies, DEX implant has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of persistent DME, DME resistant to anti-VEGF treatment and DME in difficult-to-treat vitrectomized eyes. Recently, the results of two identical phase III, multi-center, international, masked, randomized, sham-controlled trials of DEX implants (0.35 mg and 0.7 mg) in DME demonstrated that an average of 4-5 DEX implant injections administered at ≥ 6-month intervals over 3 years provides rapid and sustained functional and anatomical improvements. Retreatment with the 0.7 mg DEX implant in phakic DME eyes was associated with significant 67.9% cataract-related adverse events and 59.2% cataract surgery rate vs. only 20.4% and 7.2% rates observed in sham-controls. These cataract-related adverse event rates are comparatively lower for a DEX implant than for other commonly used intravitreal corticosteroids. As such, a DEX implant may have a better benefit to risk safety profile. A meta-analysis on corticosteroid-induced IOP elevation for the three commonly used intravitreal corticosteroids including off-label KENALOG® (intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide or IVTA (4.0 mg), Bristol-Myers Squibb, Canada. Montreal, Quebec), DEX implant and RETISERT® (intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide or IFA (0.59 mg) non-biodegradable implant, Bausch & Lomb Canada Inc., Vaughan, Ontario) found the incidence of ocular hypertension to be lowest among eyes treated with DEX implant (15%) followed by IVTA (32%) and IFA (66%).

DRCR.net Protocol U studied the effect of adding Ozurdex to patients who had incomplete response to at least 3 anti-VEGF injections. The authors randomized 116 phakic and pseudophakic patients with DME to either Ozurdex plus RBZ or RBZ alone. Change in OCT subfoveal thickness was significantly different between both groups with 110 um reduction in the ozurdex arm vs 62 um in the monotherapy RBZ arm.

The present study seeks to compare the effects of a combination treatment regimen consisting of AFL (2.0 mg) + DEX implant vs. DEX implant monotherapy in phakic or pseudophakic eyes with center-involved DME deemed to have incomplete response to 3-6 prior anti-VEGF treatments.

It is hypothesized that phakic or pseudophakic center-involved DME eyes with incomplete response to 3-6 anti-VEGF injections (i.e., RBZ, BCZ or IAI) will show a greater reduction in central subfield thickness (CST) at 24 weeks when treated with a combination treatment regimen consisting of AFL (2.0 mg) and DEX implant (0.7 mg) vs. a monotherapy treatment regimen with DEX implant (0.7 mg).

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Type 1 or 2 diabetic adult (≥18 years) patients
  2. Known glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels ≤ 11%
  3. Screening Snellen Va / Baseline ETDRS BCVA between 20/20 - 20/320
  4. Lens status: Phakic without significant cataract; <1+ nuclear sclerosis and <1+ posterior subcapsular or pseudophakic with intact posterior lens capsule and / or Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy that in the investigator's opinion is not likely to permit dislocation of DEX implant into the anterior chamber
  5. Center-involved DME > 250 µm
  6. Duration of DME ≤ 2 years
  7. Eyes with intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤ 21 with or without treatment with < 2 topical IOP-lowering medications
  8. Eyes with history of previous angle closure that have been successfully treated with either laser or surgical intervention are allowed as long as the visual fields and optic nerves have been stable for > 1 year prior to study entry

  9. Demonstrated incomplete response to 3-6 prior intravitreal anti-VEGFs (AVASTIN®, LUCENTIS®, or EYLEA®; administered every 4 ± 2 weeks over 12-36 weeks (or 3-9 months)); incomplete response is defined herein as a treatment effect resulting in:

    1. < 25% reduction in central subfield thickness (CST) by SD-OCT during two recent visits OR
    2. < 10-letter (2 lines) increase in visual acuity compared to the baseline first anti-VEGF injection
  10. If both eyes qualify, investigators can enrol the eye that has developed DME most recently.
  11. Written informed patient consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior panretinal or macular laser treatments
  2. Any Intravitreal injection prior to run-in phase
  3. Previous vitrectomy
  4. Any ocular condition that in the opinion of the investigator would not permit improvement of visual acuity with resolution of ME (e.g., epiretinal membrane, foveal atrophy, known macular ischemia, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates and/or poor foveal architecture suggestive of photoreceptor loss)
  5. Patients with retinal diseases, other than diabetes that can affect ME
  6. HbA1c levels > 11%
  7. Patient has suffered from a stroke in the last 3 months
  8. Eyes with a history of advanced glaucoma (optic nerve head change consistent with glaucoma damage and / or glaucomatous visual field loss), uncontrolled ocular hypertension (baseline IOP > 21 mmHg despite use of ≥ 2 topical IOP-lowering medication)
  9. Eyes with a history of steroid response (i.e., increase of ≥ 5 mmHg IOP following topical steroid treatment)
  10. Patients with ACIOL (Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens) or rupture of the posterior lens capsule that in the investigator's opinion is likely to permit dislocation of DEX implant into the anterior chamber
  11. Female patients who are pregnant or breast feeding: all women of child bearing potential (i.e. women who are not surgically sterile or who have had one or more menstrual cycle in the previous 12 months) must have a negative pregnancy test prior to randomization, and must agree to use appropriate measures to avoid pregnancy during the trial period.
  12. Patients who are unable to attend scheduled follow-up visits throughout the 24-week study
  13. Use of systemic steroid, systemic anti-VEGF or pro-VEGF treatment within 4 months prior to enrolment or anticipated use during the study (these drugs are prohibited from use during the study)
  14. Patients with active or suspected ocular or periocular infections including most viral diseases of the cornea and conjunctiva, including active epithelial herpes simplex keratitis (dendritic keratitis), vaccinia, varicella, mycobacterial infections, and fungal diseases.
  15. Patients with known hypersensitivity to any components of anti-VEGF or DEX implant
  16. Patients using topical anti-inflammatory medication for the duration of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Combination Treatment
Combination treatment: Participants will receive intravitreal Eylea (AFL, 2.0 mg) injection and OZURDEX implant (0.7 mg) injection within 0 to 8 days of each other.
Drug: OZURDEX
OZURDEX® (DEX implant, 0.7 mg) is a micro-ionized and non-preserved dexamethasone within a cylindrically-shaped 0.45 mm diameter x 6.5 mm length biodegradable Poly D, L-lactate-co-glycolic acid pellet allowing for sustained delivery dexamethasone into the vitreous cavity and retina following intravitreal injection. Health Canada has granted approval for use of DEX implant in the treatment of ME following central retinal vein occlusion, non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment and pseudophakic DME in adult patients. (OZURDEX® Canadian Product Monograph, April 14, 2015). DEX implant will be provided as investigational treatment by Allergan Inc., Markham, ON, Canada.
Other Names:
  • DEX, dexamethasone
Biological: Eylea
EYLEA® (AFL 2.0 mg intravitreal injections) is an anti-VEGF treatment. AFL (2.0 mg) has received approval from Health Canada for the treatment of DME. Health Canada has also granted approval for AFL (2.0 mg) in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration, and ME secondary to retinal vein occlusion.
Active Comparator: Monotherapy
Monotherapy treatment: Participants will receive OZURDEX implant (0.7 mg) injection.
Drug: OZURDEX
OZURDEX® (DEX implant, 0.7 mg) is a micro-ionized and non-preserved dexamethasone within a cylindrically-shaped 0.45 mm diameter x 6.5 mm length biodegradable Poly D, L-lactate-co-glycolic acid pellet allowing for sustained delivery dexamethasone into the vitreous cavity and retina following intravitreal injection. Health Canada has granted approval for use of DEX implant in the treatment of ME following central retinal vein occlusion, non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment and pseudophakic DME in adult patients. (OZURDEX® Canadian Product Monograph, April 14, 2015). DEX implant will be provided as investigational treatment by Allergan Inc., Markham, ON, Canada.
Other Names:
  • DEX, dexamethasone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Central Subfield Thickness
Time Frame: At 24 Weeks
Foveal central subfield (FCS) thickness is defined as the average thickness in the central 1mm diameter circle of the ETDRS grid.
At 24 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ETDRS BCVA letters
Time Frame: From Baseline to 24 Weeks
Visual acuity measurement
From Baseline to 24 Weeks
Number of re-injections
Time Frame: At 24 Weeks
Analyzing whether or not retreatment with the assigned intervention is required and how often in each group, comparatively
At 24 Weeks
Proportion of eyes with 15- and 10-ETDRS letters gained/lost at study completion
Time Frame: 24 Weeks
Visual Acuity
24 Weeks
Proportion of study eyes with PDR as per Optos color and FA at the study completion
Time Frame: 24 Weeks
Looking for proliferative diabetic retinopathy comparatively in each group
24 Weeks
Ocular Coherence Tomography
Time Frame: 24 Weeks
Medical imaging technique
24 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Pradeepa Yoganathan

Collaborators

Unity Health Toronto

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pradeepa Yoganathan, MD, FRCP(C), North Toronto Eye Care

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • COLLIDE2018-05

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Macular Edema

Clinical Trials on OZURDEX

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Morocco

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe