Actions & Insights Evaluating a Novel Diabetes Management Solution (ASCEND)

September 8, 2020 updated by: LifeScan Scotland Ltd

Actions & Insights Evaluating a Novel Diabetes Management Solution.

Single visit outcome study to obtain qualitative and quantitative data for a new BGMS.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

During ASCEND, patients will complete a single visit clinical study divided into two distinct parts. Part 1 involves each subject completing a number of simple quantitative exercises to gauge their level of comprehension of diabetes related information. Subjects will then continue during the same visit to complete part 2 which involves gathering qualitative feedback from each subject on the new Blood glucose monitoring system.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

163

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Birmingham, United Kingdom
        • Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom
        • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
      • Inverness, United Kingdom
        • Highland Clinical Research Facility

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Up to 150 male or female subjects with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Description

Summary off:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with T1DM or T2DM
  • Performs SMBG
  • Male or female, at least 16 years old.
  • Able to communicate (speak, read and write) in English
  • Willing to sign an informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unlikely to be compliant with the study in the opinion of study staff.
  • Conflict of Interest - Prospective Participants are currently working for, previously worked for, or have an immediate family member currently working for a company that manufactures or markets the products tested under this procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Scaled preference questionnaires on new blood glucose monitoring digital tool.
Time Frame: 1 hour
Proportion of positive responses from scaled response questionnaires, scaled from 1 to 6, 1 being the most negative response and 6 being the most positive.
1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Scaled preference questionnaires on new blood glucose monitoring digital tool for Type 1 subjects.
Time Frame: 1 hour
Proportion of positive responses from scaled response questionnaires, scaled from 1 to 6, 1 being the most negative response and 6 being the most positive.
1 hour
Scaled preference questionnaires on new blood glucose monitoring digital tool for Type 2 subjects.
Time Frame: 1 hour
Proportion of positive responses from scaled response questionnaires, scaled from 1 to 6, 1 being the most negative response and 6 being the most positive.
1 hour
Scaled preference questionnaires on new blood glucose monitoring digital tool based on subject A1c.
Time Frame: 1 hour
Proportion of positive responses from scaled response questionnaires, scaled from 1 to 6, 1 being the most negative response and 6 being the most positive.
1 hour
Scaled preference questionnaires on new blood glucose monitoring digital tool based on subject subject numeracy.
Time Frame: 1 hour
Proportion of positive responses from scaled response questionnaires, scaled from 1 to 6, 1 being the most negative response and 6 being the most positive.
1 hour
Preference questionnaires on new blood glucose monitoring digital tool based on insulin or non-insulin using subjects
Time Frame: 1 hour
Proportion of positive responses from scaled response questionnaires, scaled from 1 to 6, 1 being the most negative response and 6 being the most positive.
1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mike Grady, LifeScan Scotland Ltd

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 17, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 10, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 10, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3172697

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus ( Type 1 and Type 2)

3
Subscribe