- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03725826
Risk Stratification After Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiac MRI (CR-2280)
Risk Stratification for Sudden Cardiac Death After Acute Myocardial Infarction by Measuring Left Ventricular Volume Scar With Cardiac MRI
Given the existing controversy regarding the appropriate determination time for placement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in patients at risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the modest ability of current criteria to determine which patients will experience SCD, and the high impact of SCD to society, we propose to conduct a prospective non-randomized observational study to determine:
- Whether quantification of left ventricular (LV) scar volume by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMRI) prior to hospital discharge helps to predict which patients will have a low ejection fraction (35%) at follow up and qualify for ICD implantation.
- Whether quantification of infarct scar volume by CMRI will help to identify which patients will experience malignant ventricular arrhythmias and/or SCD at follow-up, independent of the LV ejection fraction (LVEF).
Primary hypothesis:
Percentage of left ventricular scar volume as measured by CMRI post-MI strongly correlates with LVEF at 40 days and 3 months.
Secondary hypothesis:
- A volume of >40% of left ventricular scar measured by CMRI post-MI is predictive of LVEF less than 35% at 40 days and at 3 months
- Volume scar as measured by Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging after AMI (at day 5) is predictive of clinical outcomes: SCD, total mortality, heart failure admission and life-threatening malignant ventricular arrhythmias regardless of ejection fraction at 40 days and at 3 months.
Safety hypothesis:
ICDs will be implanted if patients meet criteria at 40 days post MI as per the current American College of Cardiology (ACC) /American Heart Association (AHA) /Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
The proposed clinical setting of this observational study is mainly the community served by Montefiore Medical Center, the University Hospital of Albert Einstein College of Medicine. We will recruit approximately 200 patients over a year. This study will involve our two divisions (Moses and Weiler) and each study center will enroll approximately 100 patients per year.
AMI survivors either on telemetry floor or coronary care units who meet inclusion/exclusion criteria will be enrolled.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of AMI either ST segment elevation or Non-ST segment elevation MI by biomarkers of cardiac injury and symptoms. Cut-off for creatine phosphokinase (CPK) >2 times and troponin >3 times the upper limit for the lab. Only Patients who undergo coronary revascularization (PCI, CABG) will be enrolled.
- LVEF < 45%. (Based on 10 points SD in echo measurements for LVEF)
- NYHA functional class I-III
- Patients aged 18 or above, both genders.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with spontaneous or induced sustained ventricular tachycardia after 48-72 hours. (30 beats or more at 120 bpm or greater)
- Absolute contraindications to undergo CMRI (Renal failure with GFR<30% or ICD/PPM)
- Antiarrhythmic medications for ventricular arrhythmias (other than beta-blockers)
- Severe non-ischemic cardiac pathology. (e.g., ARVD, HCM, severe, restrictive cardiomyopathies (amiloydosis/sarcoidosis). We are aware that non-ischemic and ischemic cardiomyopathy may co-exist. However, these cardiomyopathies convey further arrhythmic risk and diffuse LV impairment.
- Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
- Life expectancy less than 1 year.
- Current drug or alcohol abuse.
- Pregnancy
- Claustrophobia
- Patients who are enrolled in other trials with a treatment arm. (Patients enrolled in diagnostic trials can be included).
- Difficulty to attend the follow-up schedule due to a history of medical noncompliance, living a distance from the study center, or anticipated nonresidence in the area for the length of time required for follow-up.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Acute Myocardial Infarction
Patients (aged 18 and above) with either ST segment elevation or Non-ST segment elevation MI by biomarkers of cardiac injury and symptoms.
Cut-off for CPK >2 times and troponin >3 times the upper limit for the lab.
Only Patients who undergo coronary revascularization (PCI, CABG), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I-III, and with LVEF < 45% will be enrolled.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in LVEF in post MI patients
Time Frame: 40 days post-MI and 3 months post-MI
|
The degree of LVEF recovery after a first MI provides important prognostic information.
Patients with no recovery in LVEF after MI are at high risk of sudden cardiac arrest events and death.
|
40 days post-MI and 3 months post-MI
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
LVEF less than 35%
Time Frame: At 40 days post-MI
|
The degree of LVEF recovery after a first MI provides important prognostic information.
Patients with no recovery in LVEF after MI are at high risk of sudden cardiac arrest events and death.
|
At 40 days post-MI
|
Cardiovascular Mortality
Time Frame: At 40 days post-MI
|
Cardiovascular mortality in patients was defined as death attributable to myocardial ischemia and infarction, heart failure, cardiac arrest because of other or unknown cause, or cerebrovascular accident.
|
At 40 days post-MI
|
Cardiovascular Mortality
Time Frame: at 3 months post-MI
|
Cardiovascular mortality in patients was defined as death attributable to myocardial ischemia and infarction, heart failure, cardiac arrest because of other or unknown cause, or cerebrovascular accident.
|
at 3 months post-MI
|
Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)
Time Frame: At 40 days post-MI
|
Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a ventricular rhythm faster than 100 bpm lasting at least 30 seconds or requiring termination earlier due to hemodynamic instability.
VT is defined as a wide complex tachycardia (QRS 120 milliseconds or greater) that originates from one of the ventricles, and is not due to aberrant conduction (e.g., from bundle branch block), at a rate of 100 bpm or greater.
|
At 40 days post-MI
|
Sustained ventricular fibrillation (VF)
Time Frame: At 40 days post-MI
|
Sustained ventricular fibrillation is malignant arrhythmia
|
At 40 days post-MI
|
Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)
Time Frame: At 3 months post-MI
|
Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a ventricular rhythm faster than 100 bpm lasting at least 30 seconds or requiring termination earlier due to hemodynamic instability.
VT is defined as a wide complex tachycardia (QRS 120 milliseconds or greater) that originates from one of the ventricles, and is not due to aberrant conduction (e.g., from bundle branch block), at a rate of 100 bpm or greater.
|
At 3 months post-MI
|
Sustained ventricular fibrillation (VF)
Time Frame: At 3 months post-MI
|
Sustained ventricular fibrillation is malignant arrhythmia
|
At 3 months post-MI
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Repeated Emergency Department visits
Time Frame: At 40 days post-MI
|
Safety outcomes include repeat Emergency Department (ED) visits, hospital admissions and major adverse cardiovascular events (all-cause mortality, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke).
Performance of subsequent cardiac imaging studies, cardiac catheterization and coronary interventions will also be monitored as a reflection of test efficiency.
|
At 40 days post-MI
|
Hospital admissions
Time Frame: At 40 days post-MI
|
Safety outcomes include include repeat ED visits, hospital admissions and major adverse cardiovascular events (all-cause mortality, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke).
Performance of subsequent cardiac imaging studies, cardiac catheterization and coronary interventions will also be monitored as a reflection of test efficiency.
|
At 40 days post-MI
|
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: At 40 days post-MI
|
Safety outcomes include include repeat ED visits, hospital admissions and major adverse cardiovascular events (all-cause mortality, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke).
Performance of subsequent cardiac imaging studies, cardiac catheterization and coronary interventions will also be monitored as a reflection of test efficiency.
|
At 40 days post-MI
|
Cardiac death
Time Frame: At 40 days post-MI
|
Safety outcomes include include repeat ED visits, hospital admissions and major adverse cardiovascular events (all-cause mortality, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke).
Performance of subsequent cardiac imaging studies, cardiac catheterization and coronary interventions will also be monitored as a reflection of test efficiency.
|
At 40 days post-MI
|
non-fatal myocardial infarction
Time Frame: At 40 days post-MI
|
Safety outcomes include include repeat ED visits, hospital admissions and major adverse cardiovascular events (all-cause mortality, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke).
Performance of subsequent cardiac imaging studies, cardiac catheterization and coronary interventions will also be monitored as a reflection of test efficiency.
|
At 40 days post-MI
|
Incidents of Stroke
Time Frame: At 40 days post-MI
|
Safety outcomes include include repeat ED visits, hospital admissions and major adverse cardiovascular events (all-cause mortality, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke).
Performance of subsequent cardiac imaging studies, cardiac catheterization and coronary interventions will also be monitored as a reflection of test efficiency.
|
At 40 days post-MI
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mario Garcia, M.D., Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Klein H, Levine JH, Saksena S, Waldo AL, Wilber D, Brown MW, Heo M. Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996 Dec 26;335(26):1933-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199612263352601.
- Bigger JT Jr. Prophylactic use of implanted cardiac defibrillators in patients at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias after coronary-artery bypass graft surgery. Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Patch Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov 27;337(22):1569-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199711273372201.
- Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH, Dorian P, Roberts RS, Hampton JR, Hatala R, Fain E, Gent M, Connolly SJ; DINAMIT Investigators. Prophylactic use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 9;351(24):2481-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041489.
- Buxton AE, Lee KL, Fisher JD, Josephson ME, Prystowsky EN, Hafley G. A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 16;341(25):1882-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912163412503. Erratum In: N Engl J Med 2000 Apr 27;342(17):1300.
- Zipes DP, Camm AJ, Borggrefe M, Buxton AE, Chaitman B, Fromer M, Gregoratos G, Klein G, Moss AJ, Myerburg RJ, Priori SG, Quinones MA, Roden DM, Silka MJ, Tracy C, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Antman EM, Anderson JL, Hunt SA, Halperin JL, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B, Blanc JJ, Budaj A, Dean V, Deckers JW, Despres C, Dickstein K, Lekakis J, McGregor K, Metra M, Morais J, Osterspey A, Tamargo JL, Zamorano JL; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force; European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines; European Heart Rhythm Association; Heart Rhythm Society. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2006 Sep 5;114(10):e385-484. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.178233. Epub 2006 Aug 25. No abstract available.
- Adabag AS, Therneau TM, Gersh BJ, Weston SA, Roger VL. Sudden death after myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2008 Nov 5;300(17):2022-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.553.
- Bailey JJ, Berson AS, Handelsman H, Hodges M. Utility of current risk stratification tests for predicting major arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Dec;38(7):1902-11. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01667-9.
- Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NA 3rd, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, Gillinov AM, Gregoratos G, Hammill SC, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Newby LK, Page RL, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, Stevenson LW, Sweeney MO, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Faxon DP, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices); American Association for Thoracic Surgery; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 May 27;51(21):e1-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.02.032. No abstract available. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Apr 21;53(16):1473. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jan 6;53(1):147.
- Multicenter Postinfarction Research Group. Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1983 Aug 11;309(6):331-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198308113090602.
- Zaret BL, Wackers FJ, Terrin ML, Forman SA, Williams DO, Knatterud GL, Braunwald E. Value of radionuclide rest and exercise left ventricular ejection fraction in assessing survival of patients after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) phase II study. The TIMI Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Jul;26(1):73-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00146-q.
- Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, Hochman JS, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lamas GA, Mullany CJ, Ornato JP, Pearle DL, Sloan MA, Smith SC Jr; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association; Canadian Cardiovascular Society. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Aug 4;44(3):671-719. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.002. No abstract available. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Apr 19;45(8):1376.
- Burns RJ, Gibbons RJ, Yi Q, Roberts RS, Miller TD, Schaer GL, Anderson JL, Yusuf S; CORE Study Investigators. The relationships of left ventricular ejection fraction, end-systolic volume index and infarct size to six-month mortality after hospital discharge following myocardial infarction treated by thrombolysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Jan 2;39(1):30-6. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01711-9.
- Urena PE, Lamas GA, Mitchell G, Flaker GC, Smith SC Jr, Wackers FJ, McEwan P, Pfeffer MA. Ejection fraction by radionuclide ventriculography and contrast left ventriculogram. A tale of two techniques. SAVE Investigators. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Jan;33(1):180-5. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00533-6.
- Solomon SD, Glynn RJ, Greaves S, Ajani U, Rouleau JL, Menapace F, Arnold JM, Hennekens C, Pfeffer MA. Recovery of ventricular function after myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era: the healing and early afterload reducing therapy study. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Mar 20;134(6):451-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-6-200103200-00009.
- Sheehan FH, Doerr R, Schmidt WG, Bolson EL, Uebis R, von Essen R, Effert S, Dodge HT. Early recovery of left ventricular function after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: an important determinant of survival. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Aug;12(2):289-300. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90397-x.
- Ndrepepa G, Mehilli J, Martinoff S, Schwaiger M, Schomig A, Kastrati A. Evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction and its relationship to infarct size after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jul 10;50(2):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.034. Epub 2007 Jun 21. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 23;50(17):1733.
- Buxton AE, Lee KL, DiCarlo L, Gold MR, Greer GS, Prystowsky EN, O'Toole MF, Tang A, Fisher JD, Coromilas J, Talajic M, Hafley G. Electrophysiologic testing to identify patients with coronary artery disease who are at risk for sudden death. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 29;342(26):1937-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006293422602.
- Kumar S, Sivagangabalan G, Zaman S, West EB, Narayan A, Thiagalingam A, Kovoor P. Electrophysiology-guided defibrillator implantation early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Nov;7(11):1589-97. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.07.019. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
- Newby KH, Thompson T, Stebbins A, Topol EJ, Califf RM, Natale A. Sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy: incidence and outcomes. The GUSTO Investigators. Circulation. 1998 Dec 8;98(23):2567-73. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.23.2567.
- de Bakker JM, van Capelle FJ, Janse MJ, Tasseron S, Vermeulen JT, de Jonge N, Lahpor JR. Slow conduction in the infarcted human heart. 'Zigzag' course of activation. Circulation. 1993 Sep;88(3):915-26. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.3.915.
- Hundley WG, Meshack BM, Willett DL, Sayad DE, Lange RA, Willard JE, Landau C, Hillis LD, Peshock RM. Comparison of quantitation of left ventricular volume, ejection fraction, and cardiac output in patients with atrial fibrillation by cine magnetic resonance imaging versus invasive measurements. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Nov 15;78(10):1119-23. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)90063-6.
- Marrouche NF, Verma A, Wazni O, Schweikert R, Martin DO, Saliba W, Kilicaslan F, Cummings J, Burkhardt JD, Bhargava M, Bash D, Brachmann J, Guenther J, Hao S, Beheiry S, Rossillo A, Raviele A, Themistoclakis S, Natale A. Mode of initiation and ablation of ventricular fibrillation storms in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 May 5;43(9):1715-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.004.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 13-01-023
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...RenJi Hospital; Shengjing HospitalCompletedAcute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)China
-
TherOxRecruitingAnterior Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)United States
-
NYU Langone HealthCompletedAcute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)United States
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompletedAcute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)United States
-
Kaiser PermanenteAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)CompletedAcute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)United States
-
El Zahraa GamalNot yet recruitingAcute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)
-
Datascope Corp.Duke University; Flinders Medical CentreCompletedAcute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)United States, Germany, Australia, Ireland, India, United Kingdom, Belgium, France, Italy, Netherlands
-
Angel Medical SystemsSymbios ClinicalCompletedAcute Coronary Syndrome | Coronary Occlusion | Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)United States
-
Novo Nordisk A/SDuke Clinical Research InstituteNot yet recruitingCardiovascular Risk | Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)Canada, China, United States, Germany, Spain, Korea, Republic of, Netherlands, Australia, Italy, Denmark, India, United Kingdom, Argentina, Turkey, Mexico, Malaysia, Czechia, Poland, Brazil, France, Japan, Bulgaria, Greece, Israel
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...UnknownMyocardial Infarction (MI) or Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)