- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03816683
A Disease Registry of Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma (SUMMIT)
Treatment Patterns, Outcomes, and Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life: A Prospective Disease Registry of Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treated With Novel Agents
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Montgomery, Alabama, United States, 36101
- Research Site
-
-
California
-
Clovis, California, United States, 93611
- Research Site
-
-
Colorado
-
Boulder, Colorado, United States, 80303-1385
- Research Site
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32256
- Research Site
-
Pensacola, Florida, United States, 32503
- Research Site
-
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612-9497
- Research Site
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
- Research Site
-
Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
- Research Site
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
- Research Site
-
-
Iowa
-
Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
- Research Site
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
- Research Site
-
-
Minnesota
-
Duluth, Minnesota, United States, 55805
- Research Site
-
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States, 55416
- Research Site
-
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States, 55102
- Research Site
-
-
Nebraska
-
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68510
- Research Site
-
-
New Jersey
-
Berkeley Heights, New Jersey, United States, 07922
- Research Site
-
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
- Research Site
-
-
New York
-
East Syracuse, New York, United States, 13057
- Research Site
-
New York, New York, United States, 10022
- Research Site
-
-
Oregon
-
Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401-8122
- Research Site
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States, 17822
- Research Site
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- Research Site
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19111
- Research Site
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
- Research Site
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
- Research Site
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
- Research Site
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Research Site
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
- Research Site
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98122
- Research Site
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195-9472
- Research Site
-
-
West Virginia
-
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States, 26506
- Research Site
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
- Research Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient diagnosed with Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)
- Informed consent for participation
- Age ≥ 18 years old, as of the first observed diagnosis of MCL
Patients for whom a clinical decision has been made to initiate novel therapy in the last 6 months, limited to the following novel agent categories:
- Bcl-2 inhibitors
- BTK inhibitors
- Immunomodulatory agents
- Phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors The novel agent must have been granted approval in at least one haematological cancer. Treatment must be ongoing at the time of enrollment.
Exclusion Criteria:
• Patient is participating in a clinical study that prohibits participation in non-interventional studies, or where treatment is blinded, at the time of consent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Single cohort (registry) of MCL patients
Patients diagnosed with MCL who have initiated a novel therapy meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria in the past 6 months and treatment is ongoing at the time of enrollment.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The frequency and proportion of patients exposed to each novel agent therapy
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
MCL novel agent treatment types are part of the primary study objective relating to treatment patterns and will be descriptive only and use aggregated patient data.
|
24 to 60 months
|
The frequency and proportion of patients exposed to novel agent by therapy regimen
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
MCL treatment regimens are part of the primary study objective relating to treatment patterns and will be descriptive only and use aggregated patient data.
|
24 to 60 months
|
The frequency and proportion of patients exposed to novel agent by line of therapy
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
MCL treatment line is part of the primary study objective relating to treatment patterns and will be descriptive only and use aggregated patient data.
|
24 to 60 months
|
The frequency and proportion of patients exposed to novel agent by therapy class
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months.
|
MCL treatment class is part of the primary study objective relating to treatment patterns and will be descriptive only and use aggregated patient data.
|
24 to 60 months.
|
The rate of patients who change novel agent therapy dose (in months)
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months.
|
Summarizing MCL novel agent treatment dose changes are part of the primary study objective relating to treatment patterns and will be descriptive only.
Time-to-dose change will be assessed.
The rate of dose modification (in months) will be estimated using aggregated patient data.
Summary statistics (mean, SD, median, IQR, minimum, and maximum) will be used to describe time on a particular dose, which will be measured from the start of treatment until the date of dose change or death.
|
24 to 60 months.
|
The rate of patients who interrupt novel agent therapy (in months)
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
Summarizing MCL treatment interruptions are part of the primary study objective relating to treatment patterns and will be descriptive only.
The rate of treatment interruption (in months) will be estimated using aggregated patient data.
Summary statistics (mean, SD, median, IQR, minimum, and maximum) will be used to describe time on therapy, which will be measured from the start of treatment until the date of interruption or death.
|
24 to 60 months
|
The rate of patients who discontinue novel agent therapy (in months)
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
Summarizing MCL treatment discontinuations are part of the primary study objective relating to treatment patterns and will be descriptive only.
The rate of treatment discontinuation (in months) will be estimated using aggregated patient data.
Reasons for discontinuations will be collected and summarized categorically.
Summary statistics (mean, SD, median, IQR, minimum, and maximum) will be used to describe time on therapy, which will be measured from the start of treatment until the date of discontinuation or death.
|
24 to 60 months
|
The duration of MCL treatment
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
Summarizing MCL treatment duration is part of the primary study objective relating to treatment patterns and will be descriptive only.
The duration and number of cycles of each targeted treatment (mean, SD, median, IQR, minimum, and maximum) will be summarized.
Summary statistics (mean, SD, median, IQR, minimum, and maximum) will be used to describe time on therapy (in months), which will be measured from the start of treatment until the date of discontinuation, interruption, switch or death.
|
24 to 60 months
|
Estimate the overall response rate (ORR) among patients diagnosed with MCL and initiating treatment with novel therapies
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months.
|
ORR will be measured as the frequency and proportion of patients with a complete or partial response based on physician assessment during the observation period.
|
24 to 60 months.
|
Estimate the complete response rate (CR) among patients diagnosed with MCL and initiating treatment with novel therapies.
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months.
|
The CR will be calculated as the frequency and proportion of patients with a complete response based on physician assessment during the observation period.
|
24 to 60 months.
|
Estimate progression-free survival (PFS) among patients diagnosed with MCL and initiating treatment with novel therapies.
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
All survival outcome measures will be descriptive only.
PFS will be calculated as the time from the start of novel MCL treatment until progression or death.
Summary statistics (mean, median, SD, IQR, minimum and maximum) will be used to describe PFS.
Kaplan-Meier curves will be used to graphically show PFS.
|
24 to 60 months
|
Estimate event-free survival (EFS) among patients diagnosed with MCL and initiating treatment with novel therapies.
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
All survival outcome measures will be descriptive only.
EFS will be calculated as the time from the start of novel MCL treatment to disease progression, death, or discontinuation of treatment for any reason (eg, toxicity, patient preference, or initiation of a new treatment without documented progression).
|
24 to 60 months
|
Estimate overall survival (OS) among patients diagnosed with MCL and initiating treatment with novel therapies.
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
All survival outcome measures will be descriptive only.
OS will be captured using summary statistics (mean, SD, median, IQR, minimum and maximum), which will be used to describe time from diagnosis to death, time from enrollment to death, time from index novel MCL treatment to death and time from second treatment (if applicable) to death.
Kaplan-Meier curves will be used to graphically show patient survival.
|
24 to 60 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The frequency of adverse events (AEs) in patients with MCL, where the term AE is used to include both serious and non-serious AEs.
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
The frequency of patients with AEs will be tabulated from the start of index novel MCL treatment.
AEs (both in terms of the MedDRA Preferred Terms (PTs) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] grade) will be listed individually by patient and described by System Organ Class (SOC) and PT.
|
24 to 60 months
|
The proportion of adverse events (AEs) in patients with MCL, where the term AE is used to include both serious and non-serious AEs.
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
The proportion of patients with AEs will be calculated from the start of index novel MCL treatment.
AEs (both in terms of the MedDRA Preferred Terms (PTs) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] grade) will be listed individually by patient and described by System Organ Class (SOC) and PT.
|
24 to 60 months
|
Estimate the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs) in patients with MCL
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
The proportion and frequency patients with SAEs will be tabulated from the start of index novel MCL treatment.
|
24 to 60 months
|
Estimate the frequency of reported serious adverse safety events and adverse events leading to treatment changes associated with novel agents in patients with MCL
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
The proportion and frequency of all SAEs and any AEs leading to treatment changes will be tabulated overall, and will also include the frequency and proportion of: (1) drug discontinuations, (2) dose interruptions or (3) dose changes.
|
24 to 60 months
|
Estimate the frequency and proportion of patients experiencing a clinical event of interest (related to MCL or MCL treatment)
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
The clinical events of interest that have an economic impact will be tabulated with the frequency and proportion of patients experiencing the event.
Medical interventions used for managing clinical events of interest including but not limited to: diagnostic tests, procedures and medications.
|
24 to 60 months
|
Estimate the frequency and proportion of patients experiencing healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), such as inpatient or emergency department visits
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
Each type of physician visit will be tabulated at the aggregate level using the mean, SD, median, IQR, minimum and maximum.
The total number of visits across all facilities will also be calculated.
|
24 to 60 months
|
Tabulate HRQoL responses for the validated EORTC QLC-C30 Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) in patients with MCL
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
Descriptive statistics for each validated PRO will include continuous measures (mean, median, SD, IQR, minimum, and maximum) or achievement of a particular threshold (frequency and proportion), if applicable.
This study will collect patient perceptions of HRQoL based on PRO measures in patients with MCL by collecting the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) on a quarterly basis.
The EORTC QLQ-C30 has a recall/observation period during the past week.
The questionnaire uses a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1: "Not at all" to 4: "Very much," and scores by dimension range from 0 to 100.
|
24 to 60 months
|
Tabulate HRQoL responses for the three selected, validated PRO-CTCAE PRO measures in patients with MCL
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
Descriptive statistics for each validated PRO will include continuous measures (mean, median, SD, IQR, minimum, and maximum) or achievement of a particular threshold (frequency and proportion), if applicable.
This study will collect patient perceptions of HRQoL by collecting the PRO version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) (3 questions regarding muscle pain, joint pain, heart palpitations) on a quarterly basis.
The PRO-CTCAE is intended for individuals 18 years or older and has a recall of the past 7 days.
Responses to each question are scored from 0 to 4 (in order of increasing frequency and severity).
|
24 to 60 months
|
Tabulate HRQoL responses for the validated PRO EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) in patients with MCL
Time Frame: 24 to 60 months
|
Descriptive statistics for each validated PRO will include continuous measures (mean, median, SD, IQR, minimum, and maximum) or achievement of a particular threshold (frequency and proportion), if applicable.
This study will collect patient perceptions of HRQoL based on PRO measures in patients with MCL by collecting the EQ-5D-5L on a quarterly basis.
This questionnaire is comprised of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) and 1 visual analog scale used to assess a patient's self-rated health.
Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
A unique health state is defined by combining 1 level from each of the 5 dimensions.
Each health state is referred to in terms of a 5-digit code.
|
24 to 60 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Richard Hermann, Senior Medical Director, Haematology
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, Lister TA; Alliance, Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Consortium; Italian Lymphoma Foundation; European Organisation for Research; Treatment of Cancer/Dutch Hemato-Oncology Group; Grupo Espanol de Medula Osea; German High-Grade Lymphoma Study Group; German Hodgkin's Study Group; Japanese Lymphorra Study Group; Lymphoma Study Association; NCIC Clinical Trials Group; Nordic Lymphoma Study Group; Southwest Oncology Group; United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3059-68. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800.
- Yellen SB, Cella DF, Webster K, Blendowski C, Kaplan E. Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Feb;13(2):63-74. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00274-6.
- Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, Gascoyne RD, Specht L, Horning SJ, Coiffier B, Fisher RI, Hagenbeek A, Zucca E, Rosen ST, Stroobants S, Lister TA, Hoppe RT, Dreyling M, Tobinai K, Vose JM, Connors JM, Federico M, Diehl V; International Harmonization Project on Lymphoma. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10;25(5):579-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2403. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
- Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B, Shipp MA, Fisher RI, Connors JM, Lister TA, Vose J, Grillo-Lopez A, Hagenbeek A, Cabanillas F, Klippensten D, Hiddemann W, Castellino R, Harris NL, Armitage JO, Carter W, Hoppe R, Canellos GP. Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Apr;17(4):1244. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.4.1244. Erratum In: J Clin Oncol 2000 Jun;18(11):2351.
- Ahn IE, Farooqui MZH, Tian X, Valdez J, Sun C, Soto S, Lotter J, Housel S, Stetler-Stevenson M, Yuan CM, Maric I, Calvo KR, Nierman P, Hughes TE, Saba NS, Marti GE, Pittaluga S, Herman SEM, Niemann CU, Pedersen LB, Geisler CH, Childs R, Aue G, Wiestner A. Depth and durability of response to ibrutinib in CLL: 5-year follow-up of a phase 2 study. Blood. 2018 May 24;131(21):2357-2366. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-12-820910. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
- AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. CALQUENCE® (acalabrutinib) prescribing information. October 2017.
- Chen Y, Wang M, Romaguera J. Current regimens and novel agents for mantle cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2014 Oct;167(1):3-18. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13000. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
- ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier NCT02756247. A Clinical Trial of Buparlisib and Ibrutinib in Lymphoma. Accessed 24 January 2018. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02756247].
- ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier NCT03112174. Study of Ibrutinib Combined with Venetoclax in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma (SYMPATICO). Accessed 24 January 2018. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03112174.
- Collett D. Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. 3rd edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press; 2015.
- de Claro RA, McGinn KM, Verdun N, Lee SL, Chiu HJ, Saber H, Brower ME, Chang CJ, Pfuma E, Habtemariam B, Bullock J, Wang Y, Nie L, Chen XH, Lu DR, Al-Hakim A, Kane RC, Kaminskas E, Justice R, Farrell AT, Pazdur R. FDA Approval: Ibrutinib for Patients with Previously Treated Mantle Cell Lymphoma and Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Aug 15;21(16):3586-90. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2225.
- EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC QLQ-C30 Version 3.0. 1995. Accessed 25 January 2018. Available from: http://groups.eortc.be/qol/eortc-qlq-c30.
- EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D-5L: About. Version 18 April 2017. Accessed 25 January 2018. Available from: https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-5l-about/.
- Martin P, Byrtek M, Dawson K, Ziemiecki R, Friedberg JW, Cerhan JR, Flowers CR, Link BK. Patterns of delivery of chemoimmunotherapy to patients with follicular lymphoma in the United States: results of the National LymphoCare Study. Cancer. 2013 Dec 1;119(23):4129-36. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28350. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
- Mato AR, Nabhan C, Thompson MC, Lamanna N, Brander DM, Hill B, Howlett C, Skarbnik A, Cheson BD, Zent C, Pu J, Kiselev P, Goy A, Claxton D, Isaac K, Kennard KH, Timlin C, Landsburg D, Winter A, Nasta SD, Bachow SH, Schuster SJ, Dorsey C, Svoboda J, Barr P, Ujjani CS. Toxicities and outcomes of 616 ibrutinib-treated patients in the United States: a real-world analysis. Haematologica. 2018 May;103(5):874-879. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.182907. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
- National Cancer Institute. Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE™) (version 1.0). Last updated 24 February 2017. Accessed 25 January 2018. Available from: https://healthcaredelivery.cancer.gov/pro- ctcae/overview.html.
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas. 2014. Version 4.2014.
- Steiner RE, Romaguera J, Wang M. Current trials for frontline therapy of mantle cell lymphoma. J Hematol Oncol. 2018 Jan 27;11(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0556-x.
- Tam CS, Roberts AW, Anderson M, Dawson S, Hicks R, Burbury K, et al. Combination ibrutinib (Ibr) and venetoclax (Ven) for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): primary endpoint assessment of the phase 2 AIM study. Hematol Oncol. 2017;35(S2):144-5.
- Teras LR, DeSantis CE, Cerhan JR, Morton LM, Jemal A, Flowers CR. 2016 US lymphoid malignancy statistics by World Health Organization subtypes. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Nov 12;66(6):443-459. doi: 10.3322/caac.21357. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
- Wang M, Rule S, Zinzani PL, Goy A, Casasnovas O, Smith SD, Damaj G, Doorduijn J, Lamy T, Morschhauser F, Panizo C, Shah B, Davies A, Eek R, Dupuis J, Jacobsen E, Kater AP, Le Gouill S, Oberic L, Robak T, Covey T, Dua R, Hamdy A, Huang X, Izumi R, Patel P, Rothbaum W, Slatter JG, Jurczak W. Acalabrutinib in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (ACE-LY-004): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2018 Feb 17;391(10121):659-667. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33108-2. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
- Witzig TE. Current treatment approaches for mantle-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 10;23(26):6409-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.55.017.
- Wu J, Liu C, Tsui ST, Liu D. Second-generation inhibitors of Bruton tyrosine kinase. J Hematol Oncol. 2016 Sep 2;9(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13045-016-0313-y.
- Younes A, Hilden P, Coiffier B, Hagenbeek A, Salles G, Wilson W, Seymour JF, Kelly K, Gribben J, Pfreunschuh M, Morschhauser F, Schoder H, Zelenetz AD, Rademaker J, Advani R, Valente N, Fortpied C, Witzig TE, Sehn LH, Engert A, Fisher RI, Zinzani PL, Federico M, Hutchings M, Bollard C, Trneny M, Elsayed YA, Tobinai K, Abramson JS, Fowler N, Goy A, Smith M, Ansell S, Kuruvilla J, Dreyling M, Thieblemont C, Little RF, Aurer I, Van Oers MHJ, Takeshita K, Gopal A, Rule S, de Vos S, Kloos I, Kaminski MS, Meignan M, Schwartz LH, Leonard JP, Schuster SJ, Seshan VE. International Working Group consensus response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL 2017). Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(7):1436-1447. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx097.
- Yun S, Vincelette ND, Acharya U, Abraham I. Risk of Atrial Fibrillation and Bleeding Diathesis Associated With Ibrutinib Treatment: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Four Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017 Jan;17(1):31-37.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- D8220R00004
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal.
All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment:
https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure
Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please rerefer to our disclosure commitment at
https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the deidentified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool . Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access. For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at
https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mantle Cell Lymphoma
-
Northwestern UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLCActive, not recruitingStage III Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Stage IV Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Contiguous Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Noncontiguous Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Stage I Mantle Cell LymphomaUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Stage III Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Stage IV Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Contiguous Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Noncontiguous Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Stage I Mantle Cell LymphomaUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage III Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Stage IV Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Contiguous Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Noncontiguous Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Stage I Mantle Cell LymphomaUnited States
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteNational Comprehensive Cancer NetworkCompletedStage III Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Stage IV Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Stage I Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Stage II Contiguous Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Stage II Non-Contiguous Mantle Cell LymphomaUnited States
-
University of WashingtonNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkTerminatedRecurrent Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Ann Arbor Stage I Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Ann Arbor Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Ann Arbor Stage III Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Ann Arbor Stage IV Mantle Cell LymphomaUnited States
-
Burzynski Research InstituteWithdrawnRecurrent Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Stage III Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Stage IV Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Contiguous Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Noncontiguous Stage II Mantle Cell LymphomaUnited States
-
BeiGeneRecruitingMantle Cell Lymphoma | Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)United States, China, Israel, Belgium, Poland, Spain, Turkey, Brazil, Italy, Canada, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Argentina
-
BeiGeneCompletedRefractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Relapsed Mantle Cell LymphomaChina
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingMantle Cell Lymphoma | Blastoid Variant Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Pleomorphic Variant Mantle Cell LymphomaUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedRecurrent Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Recurrent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma | Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma | Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Central Nervous System Lymphoma | Gastric Mantle Cell Lymphoma | Splenic Mantle Cell LymphomaUnited States