Efficacy and Safety Study of CA330 Hemoadsorption Device on IL-6 Removal in Septic Patients

February 20, 2019 updated by: Guan XiangDong, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Efficacy and Safety Study of CA330 Hemoadsorption Device on IL-6 Removal in Septic Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Sepsis persists to be the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Moreover, the magnitude of health care resources utilized when managing septic patients is huge. All these hard facts call for constant efforts to optimize therapy. At present, the definitive therapy is adequate antibiotics and infectious source control. Fortunately, research has led to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of sepsis, in which the activation of multiple pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators plays a key role. This has led to the development of treatment strategies aimed at restoring a balanced immune response by eliminating/deactivating these inflammatory mediators. Whilst animal models of sepsis have provided encouraging results with strategies aiming at immune response modulation, clinical studies in patients using targeted pharmacological approaches have so far proved disappointing.

Besides of acute kidney injury (AKI), renal replacement therapy (RRT) is applied to remove inflammatory mediators extracorporeally. Across the different modalities, the application of adsorption may help deactivate and decrease the peak elevation of these mediators in earlier course of sepsis, when levels of endotoxins and cytokines are extremely high. Recently, attempts to improve the outcome of sepsis patients with such devices, ie CytoSorb cytokine hemoadsorption and polymyxin B (Toraymyxin) endotoxin adsorption, have seen a certain renaissance. However, the clinical evidence to date supporting hemoadsorption for removal of endotoxins and/or proinflammatory mediators in sepsis remains incompetent and controversial.

CA330 (Jafron Biomedical Co , Ltd, Zhuhai, China) is a hemoadsorption device containing hemocompatible, porous polymeric beads capable of removing cytokines and other mid-molecular weight toxins from blood by size exclusion and surface adsorption. Compared with HA330, improved resin synthesis technology makes CA330 a better performance in removing cytokines. This trial is the first to evaluate CA330 efficacy of cytokine reduction using the change in plasma interleukin (IL)-6 concentrations over time as a primary outcome. Although the trial was neither designed nor powered to evaluate outcome, we also evaluated organ function parameters as well as 28-day all-cause mortality.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Eligible patients are stratified by site and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either CA330 hemoperfusion plus conventional medical therapy group or conventional medical therapy group. The randomization is performed by researchers on the central randomization system, provided by the Department of Biostatistics, Southern Medical University. In this study, the center coded random number table is produced by stratified and sectional randomization method. Statistical Analysis System(SAS) 9.4 statistical software is used to generate random coding tables with serial numbers (001-144) according to the number of cases allocated in each center and the proportion of experimental group and control group (1:1). The length of selected sections (block) and random seed number are sealed together as confidential data . The random number table is provided by the statisticians of the Department of Biostatistics, Southern Medical University.

The experimental group receive routine treatment of sepsis combined with cytokine adsorption column (CA330) perfusion, and the control group receive routine treatment of sepsis only.

Hemoperfusion treatments are performed using a perfusion machine via centrally inserted standard dialysis catheters at a prescribed blood flow rate of 100-300ml/min. In the beginning, lower flow rate is recommended, if there is no discomfort, then gradually increases. Each patient received 2 hemoperfusion treatments within 24 hours with a target duration for each treatment of 120-180 minutes (minimum of 120 minutes). The shorter the interval between the two hemoperfusion is, the better. It is suggested that the second hemoperfusion be performed within 0-5 hours after the first one.

Anticoagulation was recommended with low-molecular-weight heparin in arterial line of the circuit at the dose of 60-80 international units (IU)/kg. No additional dose is required. The activity of anticoagulant factor α can be monitored at 60 minutes. It is suggested that the activity of anticoagulant factor α should be maintained at 500-1000units/L in subjects without bleeding tendency and 200-400units/L in subjects with bleeding tendency. If the clinical condition is limited, it is not mandatory to monitor this parameter.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

144

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Zimeng Liu, PhD
  • Phone Number: 18826471751 +8618925002766
  • Email: sumslzm@163.com

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
        • Contact:
          • Xiangdong Guan, PhD
          • Phone Number: +8613802925067
          • Email: carlg@163.net
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Zhiyong Peng, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Qiuye Kou, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Weixing Zhang, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rongguo Yu, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Zhanguo Liu, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jun Zeng, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Wenxiong Li, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Hospitalized patients aged 18-75 years, regardless of gender;
  2. Meet the clinical criteria of sepsis according to the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis;
  3. The diagnosis of sepsis is established within last 48 hours.
  4. Written informed consent is signed, and agreement to participate in all visits, examinations and treatments as required by the research program is achieved. If a patient is not able to give consent, the legal representative is asked to consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. End-stage renal disease that need maintenance hemodialysis treatment;
  2. Congenital or acquired immunodeficiency disorders or those who had received organ transplantation within one year;
  3. Prescription of immunosuppressive medications (tripterygium wilfordii, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, FK506, etc.) or prednisolone for more than 10 mg/day (or the same dose of other hormone therapy) within 30 days;
  4. Coagulation dysfunction, severe bleeding tendency (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged significantly with bleeding, or fibrinogen less than 1.2 g/L with bleeding), active bleeding or uncontrolled acute massive bleeding within 24 hours;
  5. Malignant tumors, consumptive diseases, site of infection cannot be cleared (ie surgical patients who cannot be operated on) or body weight less than 35kg;
  6. A terminal state of organ failure (end stage of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary heart disease, heart dysfunction stage-IV, brain death or persistent vegetative state, chronic liver disease with hepatic encephalopathy, coagulation dysfunction, fluid retention and hepatocellular jaundice);
  7. Following results are detected during screening: platelet count < 50 *10^9/L, neutrophil count < 0.5 *10^9/L, hemoglobin < 70 g/L;
  8. Despite of adequate volume resuscitation, vasopressors and hormones, the mean arterial blood cannot maintain above 65 mmHg;
  9. Those who have been participating in or participated in another interventional clinical study within 30 days prior to enrollment, such as the clinical study of related drugs or medical devices affecting immunity (ie Xuebijing, ulinastatin, continuous renal replacement therapy, etc.);
  10. Anaphylaxis to materials of cardiopulmonary bypass, anticoagulants and hemoperfusion or other serious allergic history;
  11. Those who are not suitable for this clinical trial, which is determined by researchers, such as pregnant or lactating women, current drug addicts, patients with severe mental or neurological disorders, and those who have a history of alcohol abuse and cannot be terminated.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
The control group receive routine treatment of sepsis only. All sites agree, when feasible, to follow the tenets of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign clinical practice guidelines for management of sepsis.
Experimental: Experimental Group
The experimental group receive routine treatment of sepsis combined with hemoperfusion with cytokine adsorption column (CA330).
Hemoperfusion treatments are performed using a perfusion machine via centrally inserted standard dialysis catheters at a prescribed blood flow rate of 100-300ml/min. In the beginning, lower flow rate is recommended, if there is no discomfort, then gradually increases. Each patient received 2 hemoperfusion treatments within 24 hours with a target duration for each treatment of 120-180 minutes (minimum of 120 minutes). The shorter the interval between the two hemoperfusion is, the better. It is suggested that the second hemoperfusion be performed within 0-5 hours after the first one.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the reduction rate of IL-6 serum concentration at the initiation of first adsorption and at the end of the second adsorption
Time Frame: from the initiation of first adsorption until the end of the second adsorption, assessed up to 24hours
(1-Concentration IL-6 end of second adsorption/ Concentration IL-6 initiation of first adsorption) ×100%
from the initiation of first adsorption until the end of the second adsorption, assessed up to 24hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the reduction rate of IL-10 serum concentration at the initiation of first adsorption and at the end of the second adsorption
Time Frame: from the initiation of first adsorption until the end of the second adsorption, assessed up to 24hours
(1-Concentration IL-10 end of second adsorption/ Concentration IL-10 initiation of first adsorption) ×100%
from the initiation of first adsorption until the end of the second adsorption, assessed up to 24hours
the reduction rate of lactic acid serum concentration at the initiation of first adsorption and at the end of the second adsorption
Time Frame: from the initiation of first adsorption until the end of the second adsorption, assessed up to 24hours
(1-Concentration lactic acid end of second adsorption/ Concentration lactic acid initiation of first adsorption) ×100%
from the initiation of first adsorption until the end of the second adsorption, assessed up to 24hours
the reduction rate of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) serum concentration at the initiation of first adsorption and at the end of the second adsorption
Time Frame: from the initiation of first adsorption until the end of the second adsorption, assessed up to 24hours
(1-Concentration TNF-α end of second adsorption/ Concentration TNF-α initiation of first adsorption) ×100%
from the initiation of first adsorption until the end of the second adsorption, assessed up to 24hours
the dynamic change of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
The maximum APACHE II score is 71, while the minimum score is 0. The higher values represent a worse outcome.
from Day0 to Day28
ventilation time
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: hour
from Day0 to Day28
oxygenation index
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2)
from Day0 to Day28
24hour urinary output
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: ml/24h
from Day0 to Day28
length of vasopressors
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: hour
from Day0 to Day28
catecholamine index
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
(dopamine dose*1)+(dobutamine dose*1)+(adrenaline dose*100)+(noradrenaline dose*100)+(phenylephrine dose*100), wherein all doses are expressed as µg/kg/min.
from Day0 to Day28
RRT incidency
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
the percentages of patients who receive RRT in two groups
from Day0 to Day28
total length of renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: hour
from Day0 to Day28
ICU and hospital length of stay
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: day
from Day0 to Day28
28-day all-cause mortality
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
the 28-day all-cause mortality in two groups
from Day0 to Day28

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
body temperature
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: ℃
from Day0 to Day28
heart rate
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: beats per minute (bpm)
from Day0 to Day28
respiratory rate
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: times per minute
from Day0 to Day28
blood pressure
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
Both systolic and diastolic pressure will be measured. Scale: mmHg
from Day0 to Day28
count of white blood cell
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: cells/L
from Day0 to Day28
count of neutrophils
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: cells/L
from Day0 to Day28
concentration of hemoglobin
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: g/dl
from Day0 to Day28
hematocrit value
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
hematocrit value
from Day0 to Day28
count of platelet
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: cells/L
from Day0 to Day28
prothrombin time (PT)
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: second
from Day0 to Day28
activated partial thromboplastin time (APPT)
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: second
from Day0 to Day28
level of fibrinogen
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: g/dl
from Day0 to Day28
thrombin time (TT)
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: second
from Day0 to Day28
level of serum Alanine transaminase (ALT)
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: Unit/L (U/L)
from Day0 to Day28
level of serum Aspartate transaminase (AST)
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: Unit/L (U/L)
from Day0 to Day28
level of total bilirubin
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: µmol/L
from Day0 to Day28
level of direct bilirubin
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: µmol/L
from Day0 to Day28
level of total protein
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: g/L
from Day0 to Day28
level of albumin
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: g/L
from Day0 to Day28
concentration of serum creatinine
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: mg/dl
from Day0 to Day28
concentration of blood urea nitrogen
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: mmol/L
from Day0 to Day28
concentration of serum potassium
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: mmol/L
from Day0 to Day28
concentration of serum sodium
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: mmol/L
from Day0 to Day28
concentration of serum calcium
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: mmol/L
from Day0 to Day28
concentration of serum phosphorus
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: mmol/L
from Day0 to Day28
concentration of serum magnesium
Time Frame: from Day0 to Day28
scale: mmol/L
from Day0 to Day28

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 17, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-030-02

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on hemoperfusion with cytokine adsorption column (CA330)

3
Subscribe