True Short Esophagus in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

February 19, 2019 updated by: Marialuisa Lugaresi, University of Bologna

True Short Esophagus in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease or Hiatus Hernia

True short esophagus is controversial in surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatus hernia. Recently, it was published that extensive esophageal mobilization achieved an esophageal length adequate to perform around the esophagus fundoplication in all cases with satisfactory long-term results.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In the 1960s, surgery for hiatus hernia and gastroesophageal reflux disease were introduced based on anatomical principles. The technical foundations of the new surgery were essentially dictated by experience. The following findings were reported: the stomach must be wrapped around an adequate segment of intra-abdominal esophagus, the antireflux barrier is efficient if the fundoplication acts under abdominal pressure and tension over sutures must be minimal to avoid disruption. Since the early use of open antireflux surgery, controversy has arisen between surgeons who treat patients using dedicated techniques in cases diagnosed with a shortened esophagus and surgeons who deny the existence of short esophagus. The clinical results achieved by both parties were not different, independently of the adoption of an open or minimally invasive technique. In 2008, a multicenter study found that true short esophagus was present in almost 20% of patients who were routinely submitted to surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or not axial hiatus hernias; the study was based on intraoperative measurements obtained in centimeters of the distance between the gastric folds considered the gastroesophageal junction and the apex of the diaphragm after extensive mobilization of the intra thoracic esophagus. Recently, in a study performed to assess symptomatic recurrence in patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of large hernias, the authors did not perform any esophageal lengthening procedures because an adequate segment of abdominal esophagus was always achieved after extended esophageal mobilization; they concluded that the use of proton pump inhibitors for the medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease may have reduced the formation of peptic stricture, which is associated with short esophagus, and that esophageal lengthening procedures should probably no longer be applied.

In this study, the position of the gastroesophageal junction with respect for the diaphragmatic hiatus was assessed subjectively. Once more, crucial questions related to the debate on short esophagus were raised: is it possible that a) without an objective assessment of the position of the gastroesophageal junction , the gastric fundus may be inadvertently wrapped around the hypo cardia stomach, which acquires a tubular shape as a consequence of progressive esophageal shortening; and b) can the unconventional stomach around stomach fundoplication approach achieve good clinical results? To answer these questions, the investigators considered cases operated upon to gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatus hernia since 2004, when was routinely adopted the use of intraoperative endoscopic assessment of the gastroesophageal junction position with respect for the diaphragmatic hiatus, were considered. In this series, participants were grouped according to the radiological classification of hiatus hernia, the length of the intra-abdominal esophagus, the surgical techniques adopted.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

311

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 83 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients affected by gastroesophageal reflux disease or hiatus hernia submitted to primary minimally invasive surgery.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients submitted to primary minimally invasive surgery for gastroesophageal reflux diseases or hiatus hernia.
  • Age > 18 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients already submitted to minimally invasive surgery for gastroesophageal reflux diseases or hiatus hernia for recurrence of the disease.
  • Patients submitted to open surgery for gastroesophageal reflux diseases or hiatus hernia.
  • Patients affected by other esophageal diseases.
  • Age < 18 years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Gastroesophageal reflux disease
Patients submitted to primary minimally invasive surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease or hiatus hernia
Laparoscopic floppy Nissen, laparoscopic-left thoracoscopic Collis-Nissen, laparoscopic gastric fundus wrapped around the stomach

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of true short esophagus
Time Frame: 9 years
Intraoperative abdominal esophageal length < 1.5 cm
9 years
Long term results after surgery
Time Frame: 9 years
Excellent = no reflux symptoms or dysphagia or esophagitis; good = slight reflux symptoms or dysphagia on a monthly basis and no esophagitis; fair = moderate reflux symptoms or dysphagia on a weekly basis; grade A esophagitis according to Los Angeles classification; poor = severe reflux symptoms or dysphagia on a daily basis and esophagitis B,C,D according to Los Angeles classification.
9 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marialuisa Lugaresi, MD, PhD, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences University of Bologna Italy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Clinical Trials on Surgery

3
Subscribe