Pilot Study in Order to Evaluate Disconfort Among Outpatients Using actiTENS for Neuropathic Pain vs TENS ECO 2. (QolTENS)

January 24, 2023 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens

Prospective, Multicentric, Randomized on Two Arms, Controlled, by Cross-over, Pilot Study, in Order to Evaluate Disconfort Among Outpatients Using actiTENS for Neuropathic Pain vs TENS ECO 2.

Non-pharmacological treatments for pain relief are more and more used in clinical care although any scientific validation. Among the non-pharmacological treatments of neuropathic pain relief, TENS (Electrical Nerve Stimulation Therapy) is the major treatment with the best benefit. Unfortunately, the use of TENS by patients appears very difficult. Because of this inconvenience, more than 40% of TENS users interrupt the treatment despite treatment benefit. A new TENS device: actiTENS that seems to be less constraining than TENS is now available in France. ActiTENS efficacy and safety compared to TENS need to be investigated.

The main objective is to evaluate and to compare the use of actiTENS, with TENS Eco 2, the classical device in patients with chronic neuropathic pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Amiens, France, 80000
        • CHU Amiens Picardie
      • La Roche-sur-Yon, France, 85000
        • CHD La Roche sur Yon
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • CHU de Nantes
      • Paris, France, 75571
        • APHP - Hopital Saint Antoine
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • CHU de Toulouse

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult
  • Patient covered by national health insurance
  • Patient able to express consent
  • Patient with neuropathic pain with DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions) > or = 4/10.
  • Actual or potential neurologic lesion
  • Patient still using a TENS device

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned surgery in the next two months
  • Modification of the reatment in the next two motnhs
  • Other study ongoing for the patient
  • Medical contraindication for TENS

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: TENS Eco2
TENS Eco2 is the classical device in patients with chronic neuropathic pain
TENS Eco2 or actiTENS, both admitted and reimbursed in FRANCE according to regulation
Experimental: actiTENS
ActiTENS is a new TENS device, that seems less cotraining.
TENS Eco2 or actiTENS, both admitted and reimbursed in FRANCE according to regulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disconfort of using TENS (Electrical Nerve Stimulation Therapy) Eco2 versus actiTENS
Time Frame: day7 after patient inclusion
Discomfort evaluation will be determined by using VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)
day7 after patient inclusion
Disconfort of using TENS (Electrical Nerve Stimulation Therapy) Eco2 versus actiTENS
Time Frame: day 35 after patient inclusion
Discomfort evaluation will be determined by using VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)
day 35 after patient inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
length of TENS daily use
Time Frame: day7 after patient inclusion
Length of TENS daily use
day7 after patient inclusion
length of TENS daily use
Time Frame: day 35 after patient inclusion
Length of TENS daily use
day 35 after patient inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric Serra, MD, CHU Amiens

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 17, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuropathic Pain

Clinical Trials on TENS

3
Subscribe