A Novel Analgesic Method for Postoperative Pain Relief After Cesarean Section: Intraoperative Superior Hypogastric Block

March 28, 2019 updated by: Berna Haliloglu Peker, Maltepe University

Cesarean section is the most common inpatient surgical procedure in the United States with 1.3 million cesarean deliveries performed in 2015. Cesarean section frequency is increasing rapidly in worldwide, especially in middle and high income countries.

Postoperative pain is an expected outcome for patients following surgical procedures. Inadequate pain relief is still a common problem among hospitalized patients. Cesarean section ranked ninth for pain severity among 179 different surgical procedures.

Multimodal pain therapy has been suggested for postoperative pain management after cesarean delivery. The most commonly used modalities are systemic administration of opioids, either by intramuscular injection or IV by patient-controlled analgesia, and neuraxial injection of opioid as part of a regional anesthetic for cesarean delivery. These techniques have specific advantages and disadvantages.

Superior hypogastric plexus blockade (SHB) has been shown an effective method for pain relıef after gynecologic procedures, it has been shown that SHP can be easily performed intraoperatively during hysterectomy procedure In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of SHB performed intraoperatively for postoperative pain relief after cesarean section. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use SHB intraoperatively for pain relief after cesarean section in the literature.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Cesarean section is a life-saving surgical operation performed during pregnancy and labor. It is the most common inpatient surgical procedure in the United States with 1.3 million cesarean deliveries performed in 2015. Cesarean section frequency is increasing rapidly in worldwide, especially in middle and high income countries.

Postoperative pain is an expected outcome for patients following surgical procedures. Inadequate pain relief is still a common problem among hospitalized patients. A number of surveys report that 30%-70% of surgical patients experience moderate to severe pain (Breivik) At least 10.9% of women experience severe pain within 24 h after cesarean section. An analysis of 50523 patients from 105 hospitals questioning pain intensity on the first postoperative day revealed that cesarean section ranked ninth for pain severity among 179 different surgical procedures.

In this regard, multimodal pain therapy has been suggested for postoperative pain management after cesarean delivery. It requires the use of a combination of drugs with different mechanisms of action, and aims at achieving optimal analgesia through additive or synergistic drug action with small doses of opiates and decreased side effects. The most commonly used modalities are systemic administration of opioids, either by intramuscular injection or IV by patient-controlled analgesia, and neuraxial injection of opioid as part of a regional anesthetic for cesarean delivery. These techniques have specific advantages and disadvantages.

Recently, superior hypogastric plexus blockade (SHB) has been shown an effective method for pain relıef after gynecologic procedures, i.e. hysterectomy (kaynak). The superior hypogastric plexus (SHP) is a retroperitoneal structure located bilaterally at the level of the lower third of the fifth lumbar vertebral body and upper third of the first sacral vertebral body at the sacral promontory in which it is most accessible to block for pelvic pain relief. Besides it can be performed either by fluoroscopy-guided, ultrasound (US)-guided, or CT-guided techniques, it has been shown that SHP can be easily performed intraoperatively during hysterectomy procedure ().

In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of SHB performed intraoperatively for postoperative pain relief after cesarean section. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use SHB intraoperatively for pain relief after cesarean section in the literature.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

154

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • İstanbul, Turkey, 34844
        • Maltepe University Faculty of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Term singleton pregnant women between ages 18 to 40 with no previous history of cesarean section or abdominal surgery were scheduled for elective cesarean operation under general anaesthesia. Only ASA 1-2 patients were included to the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • We excluded patients with suspected or manifest bleeding disturbances, chronic pelvic pain, allergy to NSAID's or opioids, atopia, bronchial asthma, diabetes mellitus, the presence of liver or kidney diseases, abuse of drugs or alcohol, and patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension or preeclampsia. The patients underwent emergency cesarean section were also excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Superior Hypogastric Block group
The group which superior hypogastric block performed intraoperatively
SHP is situated anterior to L5-S1 vertebral bodies, caudal to the bifurcation of the aorta. An injection of 20 ml of bupivacaine 2,5 mg/ml or saline 9 mg/ml was done retroperitoneally in the area.
Placebo Comparator: placebo controlled group
The group which placebo used
SHP is situated anterior to L5-S1 vertebral bodies, caudal to the bifurcation of the aorta. An injection of 20 ml of bupivacaine 2,5 mg/ml or saline 9 mg/ml was done retroperitoneally in the area.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain scores on rest and on movement at 24 th hour after surgery
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
Postoperative pain assessed by the 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable
up to 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain scores on rest and on movement at 2,6 and 48 th hour after surgery
Time Frame: Up to 48 hours
Postoperative pain assessed by the 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable
Up to 48 hours
Opioid or NSAID requirement after surgery
Time Frame: Up to 48 hours
Total opioid and NSAID requirement for postoperative pain relief after surgery were calculatedcalculated
Up to 48 hours
Return of gastrointestinal function
Time Frame: Up to 48 hours
First passage of flattus was noted as a sign of bowel function
Up to 48 hours
Rate of nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: Up to 48 hours
Rate of nausea and vomiting as a side effect of the procedure
Up to 48 hours
length of surgery
Time Frame: Up to 1 hour
length of cesarean section was recorded in each group
Up to 1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Berna Haliloglu Peker, Prof. Dr, Maltepe University Faculty of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 2, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Intraoperative superior hypogastric plexus block

3
Subscribe