A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Non-inferiority Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Entelon®

May 23, 2019 updated by: Yong Un shin, Hanyang University

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Non-inferiority Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Entelon® as Compared to Doxium Tab. And Placebo for the Treatment of Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

This was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind controlled study that compared the efficacy and safety of V. vinifera extract, calcium dobesilate (CD), and placebo in subjects with DME. Patients made 6 clinic visits, namely the screening visit; baseline visit (T0); and follow-up visits at 3 (T3), 6 (T6), 9 (T9), and 12 (T12) months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Eligible patients were randomised to one of the three study groups in a 1:2:2 ratio (placebo:GSPE:CD group). The randomization schedule was generated and prepared using cubeIWRS® solution (CRScube Inc., Seoul, South Korea, HQ). Randomization was performed using a complete randomization algorithm according to the order of the baseline visit. Subjects took three tablets of a masked study medication three times daily for 12 months; the first dose was taken in the morning of the baseline visit (T0) after baseline assessments were performed, and the last dose was taken in the evening before the month 12 visit (T12). Three daily oral doses of 50mg tablets of GSPE (Entelon®, Hanlim Pharm, Seoul, South Korea) were administered to patients in the GSPE group. Placebo tablets lacked GSPE, but their appearance was identical to that of the study group tablets. Commercially available 250mg CD tablets (Doxium®, Ilsung Pharm, Seoul, South Korea) were used in this study. The identity of the masked study medications was concealed by storing the medications in individually sealed envelopes at the study sites.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

153

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Singing a written informed consent prior to selection
  • type 2 DM aged between 40 and 80 years
  • Diabetes is well controlled with drugs for at least 3 months(HbA1c ≤9%)
  • Best-corrected visual acuity over 0.5(20/40) by using ETDRS cisual acuity test
  • Diabetic macular edema with hard exudates CSMT ≤300µm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lase therapy or intravitreal injection(anti-VEGF, steroid) intraocular surgery within 6 months of enrollment
  • Concomitant macular disease (such as retinal vascular occlusion, choroidal neovascularization, epiretinal membrane, etc)
  • Poor image of optical coherence tomography(signal strength under 50% of narmal value)
  • Concomitant therapy(Kallidinogenase, Vaccinium myrtillus extract, sulodexide)
  • Non-controlled hypertension(systolic pressure >140mmHg or diastolic pressure <90mmHg)
  • Severe renal insufficiency(creatinine >2.2mg/dL, or undergoing dialysis)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Entelon
Three daily oral doses of 50mg tablets were administered to patients
Three daily oral doses of 50mg tablets of Vitis vinifera extract(Entelon®, Hanlim Pharm, Seoul, South Korea) were administered to patients in this group
Other Names:
  • Experimental: Entelon
Active Comparator: Doxium
Three daily oral doses of 250mg tablets were administered to patients
Three daily oral doses of 50mg tablets of Calcium Dobesilate(Doxium®, Ilsung Pharm, Seoul, South Korea) were administered to patients in this group
Other Names:
  • Active comparator:Doxium
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Three masking tablets were administered to patients
Placebo tablets lacked Vitis vinifera extract or calcium dobesilate, but their appearance was identical to those of the study group tablets.
Other Names:
  • Placebo comparator:Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change(Improvement)in the hard exduates
Time Frame: T0(baseline), T12(12months)
The improvement of HE was defined as a decrease in the HE severity by at least two categories of severity at T12 compared with the baseline visit.
T0(baseline), T12(12months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change of Best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA)
Time Frame: T0(baseline), T3(3months), T6(6months), T9(9months), T12(12months)
Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study(ETDRS) protocol
T0(baseline), T3(3months), T6(6months), T9(9months), T12(12months)
The change of central subfield mean thickness(CSMT)
Time Frame: T0(baseline), T3(3months), T6(6months), T9(9months), T12(12months)
Using 6-radial scan protocol or cube scan protocol according to local guidelines of each center;the ETDRS style map
T0(baseline), T3(3months), T6(6months), T9(9months), T12(12months)
The change of total macular volum(TMV)
Time Frame: T0(baseline), T3(3months), T6(6months), T9(9months), T12(12months)
Using 6-radial scan protocol or cube scan protocol according to local guidelines of each center;the ETDRS style map
T0(baseline), T3(3months), T6(6months), T9(9months), T12(12months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ha kyoung Kim, PhD, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 21, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 26, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 26, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Retinopathy

Clinical Trials on Vitis vinifera extract

3
Subscribe