Exercise-based Cardiac Rehabilitation for the Prevention of Breast Cancer Chemotherapy-induced Cardiotoxicity (ONCORE)

May 11, 2023 updated by: Carlos Peña Gil, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago

Randomized Controlled Trial on Comprehensive Exercise-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs for the Prevention of Anthracyclines and/or Anti-HER2 Antibodies-induced Cardiotoxicity in Breast Cancer

This project aims to determine whether a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program including supervised exercise training is able to prevent cardiotoxicity during treatment with anthracyclines and / or anti-HER-2 antibodies in women with breast cancer. Participants will be randomly allocated to cardiac rehabilitation (intervention group) or conventional management with physical exercise recommendation (control group).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Cardiovascular toxicity caused by chemotherapy is the leading cause of death in patients who survive cancer. Physical exercise during chemotherapy has shown to improve quality of life and decrease the risk of death. The objective of this project is to determine whether an intervention through a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program including supervised physical exercise is able to prevent anthracyclines and / or anti-HER-2 antibodies-induced cardiotoxicity in women with breast cancer.

For this purpose, the investigators intend to conduct a randomized controlled study including female patients managed under the same cardiotoxicity prevention protocol (clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic follow-up assessment). Patients will be randomized to a non-pharmacological intervention (participation in a multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation program with supervised exercise training) or control (conventional management and physical activity recommendation)*.

The investigators hypothesize that a cardiac rehabilitation program may limit chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in women with breast cancer, improve cardiac remodeling assessed by echocardiography and enhance their global cardiovascular risk profile to a greater extent, compared to control group.

* OF NOTE: Due to the COVID-19 pandemics, several modifications to the original protocol were introduced for safety reasons or motivated by the health situation, namely:

  1. Intervention: Change from centre-based to telematic supervised exercise training sessions provided within the cardiac rehabilitation program (intervention group)
  2. Secondary outcome 4: Change in functional capacity assessed by conventional ergometry or cardiopulmonary exercise test OR the 6-minute walking test (metabolic equivalents: METs or peak oxygen consumption: VO2)
  3. Recruiting centres: One centre (Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron) withdrew from the study due to the impossibility of assuming its execution.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

122

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • A Coruña
      • Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain, 15706
        • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 69 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First diagnosis of breast cancer at early stages (I, II, III)
  • Treatment with anthracyclines and / or anti-HER-2 antibodies (trastuzumab and / or pertuzumab)
  • Possibility of completing a cardiac rehabilitation program (centre-based or telematic) and programmed visits.
  • Providing written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with previous history of heart disease or heart failure.
  • Left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction <53%) at baseline.
  • Metastatic disease.
  • Patients carrying an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
  • Patients with physical or mental limitation to carry out an exercise program.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cardiac Rehabilitation
Patients enrolled in the integrated exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program (centre-based or telematic)

Integrated cardiac rehabilitation program that includes supervised exercise training*.

* Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, supervised physical exercise training had to be conducted telematically (through live guided training sessions conducted online, with the same design, frequency, and dosage of exercise).

No Intervention: Conventional management
Patients with conventional management and physical activity recommendation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in left ventricular systolic function quantified by left ventricular ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain by transthoracic echocardiography
Time Frame: Baseline to every 3 months through study completion, at the end of the study at an average of 18 months, and every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
Fall of 10 absolute percentage points of left ventricular ejection fraction with final value below 53% or global longitudinal strain fall >15% with respect to baseline
Baseline to every 3 months through study completion, at the end of the study at an average of 18 months, and every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in health-related quality of life assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast plus Arm Morbidity (FACT-B+4) questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Score achieved in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast plus Arm Morbidity (FACT-B+4) questionnaire, a specific validated scale to assess quality of life of women with breast cancer. It comprises 27 items within 5 areas of assessment: physical well-being (7 items), social and family environment (7 items), emotional well-being (7 items), functional well-being (6 items) and worries related to the diagnosis and treatment of the disease (9 items). Each item is scored by means of a Likert scale from 0 to 5, with higher scores representing better results. The total score is obtained by adding the scores for each item, and ranges from a minimum of 0 (worst posible result) to a maximum of 146 (best possible result).
Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in tolerance to chemotherapy: number of participants with significant cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular adverse effects throughout the study
Time Frame: Every 3 months during study completion and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Significant cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular adverse effects during treatment, threatening life, requiring admission, prolonging hospitalization, being clinically relevant or causing chemotherapy interruptions
Every 3 months during study completion and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in global functional capacity assessed by conventional ergometry, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) or the 6-minute walking test (6MWT).
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months

Change in functional capacity assessed by conventional ergometry, cardiopulmonary exercise test or the 6-minute walking test (6MWT) (metabolic equivalents: METs or peak oxygen consumption: VO2) * .

*Due to COVID-19 pandemic, participants' assessment with CPET had to be stopped for safety concerns. In such cases, functional capacity was estimated from the maximum work rate in the 6-minute walking test (6MWT). This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes, which is well correlated with VO2. The 6MWT has been proved to be valid and reliable for functional capacity assessment in the study population.

Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in localized lower limb functional capacity assessed by number of repetitions performed within 30 seconds in the sit-to-stand test
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Number of repetitions in the sit-to-stand test within 30 seconds
Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in shoulder functional capacity assessed by range of degrees in shoulder movement by goniometry
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Range of degrees in shoulder movement measured by goniometry
Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in upper limb strength measured by dynamometry (kg)
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Kilograms by dynamometry of right and left upper limbs
Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in shoulder pain and disability assessed by the SPADI (shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Score achieved in the SPADI (shoulder pain and disability index) questionnaire. The pain dimension consists of five questions regarding the severity of an individual's pain, functional activities are assessed with eight questions. Each question may be scored from 0 to 10. Verbal anchors for the pain dimension are 'no pain at all' (0) and 'worst pain imaginable' (10) ,and those for the functional activities are 'no difficulty' (0) and 'so difficult it required help' (10). The scores from both dimensions are averaged to produce a total score ranging from 0 (best) to 100 (worst).
Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in cardiovascular risk profile as assessed by the presence or absence of classic cardiovascular risk factors
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Dyslipidemia, Diabetes mellitus, Arterial Hypertension, Smoking status
Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in anthropometric parameters: height in cm
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Height measured in cm
Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in anthropometric parameters: weight in kg
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Weight measured in kg
Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in anthropometric parameters: body mass index (BMI) in kg/m^2
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in anthropometric parameters: abdominal circumference in cm
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Abdominal perimeter measured with a tape measure in cm
Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in resting heart rate measured by pulse oximetry (beats per min)
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Resting heart rate by pulse oximetry (beats per min)
Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in resting blood pressure (mmHg) measured by sphygmomanometer
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Resting blood pressure by sphyngomanometer in mmHg
Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in biomarkers NT-ProBNP
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Value of NT-ProBNP(pg/mL) in blood tests
Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in biomarkers: troponin
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Value of troponin I (ng/mL) in blood tests
Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in biomarkers: haemoglobin
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Value of haemoglobin (g/dL) in blood tests
Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in dietary pattern as assessed by the PREDIMED (PREvención con DIeta MEDiterránea) questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Validated questionnaire to assess adherence to Mediterranean diet, including 14 questions regarding dietary habits, rated with 0 or +1 points. Global score is calculated by summing points and ranges from 0 to 14, with higher score representing higher adherence.
Baseline and at the end of the study at an average of 18 months
Change in the score for depression assessed by Zigmond and Snaith questionnaire to rate anxiety and depression
Time Frame: Baseline and at study completion at an average of 18 months, plus at the end of training (at an average of 12 to 15 months) in the intervention group
Score achieved in the depression subscale of the Zigmond and Snaith test for anxiety or depression, a self-applied questionnaire. Depression scale includes 7 items each, scored on Likert scale from 0 to 3. Global score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing greater depression. The authors suggest that scores higher than eleven would indicate "case" and more than eight would be considered "probable case" (Zigmond and Snaith, 1983).
Baseline and at study completion at an average of 18 months, plus at the end of training (at an average of 12 to 15 months) in the intervention group
Change in the score for anxiety assessed by the Zigmond and Snaith questionnaire to rate depression and anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline and at study completion, plus at the end of training (at an average of 12 to 15 months) in the intervention group
Score achieved in the anxiety subscale of the Zigmond and Snaith test for anxiety or depression, a self-applied questionnaire. Anxiety scale includes 7 items each, scored on Likert scale from 0 to 3. Global score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing greater anxiety. The authors suggest that scores higher than eleven would indicate "case" and more than eight would be considered "probable case" (Zigmond and Snaith, 1983).
Baseline and at study completion, plus at the end of training (at an average of 12 to 15 months) in the intervention group
Change in physical activity (minutes of dedicated physical activity)
Time Frame: Baseline and at study completion at an average of 18 months
Minutes of In- and out-of-hospital dedicated physical activity
Baseline and at study completion at an average of 18 months
Change in physical activity assessed by the score in the Godin Leisure Test Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ)
Time Frame: Baseline and at study completion at an average of 18 months
Score achieved in the Godin Leisure Test Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) for quantification of physical activity. Activities are classified into three subgroups: "strenuous," "moderate," and "light." The scores corresponding to the energy expenditure (metabolic equivalent (MET)) are obtained by multiplying activities performed for more than 15 min in a week with their coefficients. The numbers represent the MET intensity values (strenuous/ exhausting exercises: 9 METs, moderate exercises: 5 METs, and light exercises: 3 METs).The increasing scores are associated with the increasing number of exercise behaviors, providing references about the contribution of physical activity to health: the activity score of 24 units and more as active (substantial benefits); the activity score of 14-23 units as moderately active (some benefits); and the activity score of 13 units and less as inactive (less substantial or low benefits).
Baseline and at study completion at an average of 18 months
Change in lymphedema assessed by perimeter of the upper limb by cirtometry (cm), stage and grade
Time Frame: Baseline after surgery and 2-4 weeks after the end of chemotherapy (at an average of 12 to 15 months)
Perimeter of the upper limb by cirtometry (cm), stage and grade as defined by the Spanish Society of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine
Baseline after surgery and 2-4 weeks after the end of chemotherapy (at an average of 12 to 15 months)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence and compliance to cardiac rehabilitation program (intervention group) assessed by number of training sessions attended/ number of sessions planned
Time Frame: At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program at an average of 12 to 15 months
Number of training sessions attended / number of sessions planned
At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program at an average of 12 to 15 months
Security of the cardiac rehabilitation program assessed by number of adverse events during training (intervention group)
Time Frame: At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program at an average of 12 to 15 months
Adverse events during training
At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program at an average of 12 to 15 months
Changes in expectations regarding the cardiac rehabilitation program assessed by a questionnaire (intervention group)
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program at an average of 12 to 15 months
Program-related expectations at baseline and at the end of the program' are collected through an open question "What do you expect to achieve by participating in the program?" Responses regarding expectations will be categorized by the evaluator within the following areas: psychological sphere and/or social sphere and/or physical sphere. Global expectations of benefit are scored from 0 (no benefit) to 10 (highest benefit).
Baseline and at the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program at an average of 12 to 15 months
Satisfaction with the cardiac rehabilitation program assessed by a questionnaire (intervention group)
Time Frame: At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program at an average of 12 to 15 months

Satisfaction at the end of the program is assessed by a questionnaire including 9 questions concerning comfort with training sessions, training spaces and development of the program, which are scored from 0 (worse posible result) to 10 (best posible result). Total score is calculated by adding for each question, and ranges from 0 to 90.

* Due to the introduction of telematic exercise training during COVID-19 pandemic, questions were slightly modified to include assessment of satisfaction with this training modality.

At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program at an average of 12 to 15 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amparo Martínez Monzonís, MD, PhD, Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, CIBER-CV
  • Principal Investigator: Carlos Peña Gil, MD, PhD, Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, CIBER-CV
  • Study Director: José Ramón González Juanatey, MD, PhD, Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, CIBER-CV

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiotoxicity

Clinical Trials on Cardiac rehabilitation

3
Subscribe