Hemostasis Using Surgicel in Pediatric Tonsillectomy

June 12, 2019 updated by: Abdulmohsen Al-Terki, Dr. Abdul Mohsen Ibrahim Al-Turki Clinic

Tonsillectomy is one of the commonest procedures performed in otolaryngology and one of its major complications is post-tonsillectomy bleeding.

The goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness of Surgicel without bipolar cautery in achieving primary hemostasis in tonsillectomy. The patient that were enrolled in this retrospective study were patients who underwent tonsillectomy and achieved hemostasis either by Surgicel (group A) or bipolar cautery (group B). Our results showed that there was no statistical significant difference between the two techniques in terms of post-operative bleeding events.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Tonsillectomy is one of the commonest procedures performed in otolaryngology and one of its major complications is post-tonsillectomy bleeding.

The goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness of Surgicel without bipolar cautery in achieving primary hemostasis in tonsillectomy.

The study was a retrospective cohort in three tertiary care centers in xxxx, from January 2016 to August 2018. All patients underwent at least tonsillectomy, with a proportion undergoing additional adenoidectomy, myringotomy, or tube insertion as indicated, were enrolled in the study. Patients were stratified to 2 groups according to the surgeons preference for the hemostasis technique, one was subjected to cold dissection tonsillectomy and achieved hemostasis via the application of Surgicel to the surgical site, and the other underwent cold dissection tonsillectomy and attained hemostasis through bipolar cautery.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

203

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 12 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

any patient under the age of 12 who underwent tonsillectomy due to either recurrent tonsillitis or OSA by the 3 consultant otolaryngology surgeon authors in the study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under age of 12, diagnosed with recurrent tonsillitis or OSA and are candidates for tonsillectomy
  • patients must have went tonsillectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age more than 12

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Group A: Surgicel Group
a retrospective cohort study. Two groups were assigned, the first under the care of the author [AA], in which patients of his group underwent cold dissection tonsillectomy and achieved hemostasis via surgicel (without bipolar cautery). While group B patients (consisted of 2 surgeons) underwent cold dissection tonsillectomy and attained hemostasis with bipolar cautery. The main outcome that was pursued was postoperative tonsillectomy bleeding
Group B: Bipolar Cautery group
a retrospective cohort study. Two groups were assigned, the first under the care of the author [AA], in which patients of his group underwent cold dissection tonsillectomy and achieved hemostasis via surgicel (without bipolar cautery). While group B patients (consisted of 2 surgeons) underwent cold dissection tonsillectomy and attained hemostasis with bipolar cautery. The main outcome that was pursued was postoperative tonsillectomy bleeding

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Post-operative tonsillectomy bleeding
Time Frame: 24 hours post-op
Bleeding due to the surgical procedure within 24 hours from the surgery
24 hours post-op
Secondary Post-operative Tonsillectomy bleeding
Time Frame: after 24 hours
Bleeding due to the surgical procedure after 24 hours from the surgery
after 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 13, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Blood Loss

3
Subscribe