A Randomized Controlled Trial of Geriatric Emergency Department Innovations

February 20, 2024 updated by: Scott Dresden, Northwestern University
This study evaluates the Geriatric Emergency Department Innovations (GEDI) program at Northwestern Memorial Hospital to care for older adults in the emergency department. Half of the patients will be cared for by a standard ED team plus the GEDI team, while half of the patients will receive usual ED care.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Hospitalization is common for older adults in the Emergency Department (ED) but it carries significant risks including the development of delirium, falls, and nosocomial infections. The Geriatric Emergency Department Innovations (GEDI) program at Northwestern Memorial Hospital attempts to identify and address health related risks for older adults without exposing them to the risks of hospitalization,. GEDI is a unique program consisting of a multidisciplinary team of Transitional Care Nurses (TCN), social workers, pharmacists, occupational therapists and physical therapists who perform ED-based geriatric assessment and care coordination.

To determine the impact of GEDI on health services use and Health Related Quality-of-Life (HRQoL) we will conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing GEDI compared to usual ED care(which often involves hospitalization).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

840

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Recruiting
        • Northwestern University Department of Emergency Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Scott M Dresden, MD, MS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Northwestern Emergency Department patients who are:

  • 65 years or older
  • living independently or with friends, family, or caregivers in the community
  • Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score of 4 or greater

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded if they:

  • Tested positive for COVID-19
  • Are unable to complete the assessments in English
  • Are unable to provide informed consent with no Legally Authorized Representative Present or are unable to complete follow-up participation
  • Are held in the ED involuntarily as a prisoner or patient with a psychiatric complaint
  • Are enrolled in another study to avoid patient fatigue and confounding
  • Received a GEDI, Social Work, Pharmacy, or Physical Therapy consult outside of this trial during the current ED visit
  • Leave the ED against medical advice or without being seen by a physician
  • Are admitted to the ICU
  • Are too medically unstable to participate in the assessment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Standard emergency department care
Other: Intervention
Standard emergency department are plus GEDI consult
Geriatric assessment and care coordination provided by a multidisciplinary team in the emergency department including transitional care nurses, social workers, pharmacists, occupational therapists, and physical therapists.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with hospital admission or death
Time Frame: 30 days
A composite measure of any hospitalizations or death during the index ED visit or within the follow up time frame
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PROMIS-Preference
Time Frame: 9 days

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Preference (PROPr) score summarizes multiple domains into a single score anchored at 0 (as bad as dead) and 1 (perfect or ideal health). This score quantifies the value that individuals place on different states of health. Preference-based scores can be used in cost-utility analyses and to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

PROPr is calculated from the scores for the 7 PROMIS domains: Cognition, Depression, Fatigue, Pain Interference, Physical Function, Sleep Disturbance, and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities.

Preference-based scores PROMIS domain scores can be calculated using the HealthMeasures Scoring Service. The HealthMeasures Scoring Service export includes PROMIS theta values used to calculate PROPr using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) which is available at https://github.com/janelhanmer/PROPr

9 days
PROMIS-Preference
Time Frame: 30 days

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Preference (PROPr) score summarizes multiple domains into a single score anchored at 0 (as bad as dead) and 1 (perfect or ideal health). This score quantifies the value that individuals place on different states of health. Preference-based scores can be used in cost-utility analyses and to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

PROPr is calculated from the scores for the 7 PROMIS domains: Cognition, Depression, Fatigue, Pain Interference, Physical Function, Sleep Disturbance, and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities.

Preference-based scores PROMIS domain scores can be calculated using the HealthMeasures Scoring Service. The HealthMeasures Scoring Service export includes PROMIS theta values used to calculate PROPr using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) which is available at https://github.com/janelhanmer/PROPr

30 days
Return Emergency Department Visits
Time Frame: 9 days
Any Emergency Department Visits which occurs after the ED encounter in which the patient was enrolled in the study.
9 days
Return Emergency Department Visits
Time Frame: 30 days
Any Emergency Department Visits which occurs after the ED encounter in which the patient was enrolled in the study.
30 days
Death
Time Frame: 9 days
All cause death
9 days
Death
Time Frame: 30 days
All cause death
30 days
PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Physical Function (Adaptive)
Time Frame: 9 days

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Item Bank uses Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) in which participant responses guide the system's choice of subsequent items from the full item bank (165 items in total in adult bank). Although items differ across respondents taking CAT, scores are comparable across participants.

Measure Description: PROMIS subscale for physical function assesses the extent to which patients' perceived capability rather than actual performance of physical activities using a 5-point Likert scale. PROMIS uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. T-scores range from 20 to 80. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured.

9 days
PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Physical Function (Adaptive)
Time Frame: 30 days

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Item Bank uses Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) in which participant responses guide the system's choice of subsequent items from the full item bank (165 items in total in adult bank). Although items differ across respondents taking CAT, scores are comparable across participants.

Measure Description: PROMIS subscale for physical function assesses the extent to which patients' perceived capability rather than actual performance of physical activities using a 5-point Likert scale. PROMIS uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. T-scores range from 20 to 80. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured.

30 days
PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate Social Roles and Activities (Adaptive)
Time Frame: 9 days

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities Item Bank uses Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) in which participant responses guide the system's choice of subsequent items from the full item bank (35 items in total). Although items differ across respondents taking CAT, scores are comparable across participants.

Measure Description: PROMIS item bank for ability to participate in social roles and activities assesses the extent to which patients' perceived ability to perform one's usual social roles and activities using a 5-point Likert scale. PROMIS uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. T-scores range from 20 to 80. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured.

9 days
PROMIS Item Bank v2.0 - Ability to Participate Social (Adaptive)
Time Frame: 30 days

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities Item Bank uses Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) in which participant responses guide the system's choice of subsequent items from the full item bank (35 items in total). Although items differ across respondents taking CAT, scores are comparable across participants.

Measure Description: PROMIS item bank for ability to participate in social roles and activities assesses the extent to which patients' perceived ability to perform one's usual social roles and activities using a 5-point Likert scale. PROMIS uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. T-scores range from 20 to 80. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured.

30 days
PROMIS Item Bank v. 1.0 - Emotional Distress - Anxiety (Adaptive)
Time Frame: 9 days

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Item Bank uses Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) in which participant responses guide the system's choice of subsequent items from the full item bank (29 items in total). Although items differ across respondents taking CAT, scores are comparable across participants.

Measure Description: PROMIS item bank for anxiety assesses the extent to which patients experience anxiety symptoms over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale. PROMIS uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. T-scores range from 20 to 80. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured.

9 days
PROMIS Item Bank v. 1.0 - Emotional Distress - Anxiety (Adaptive)
Time Frame: 30 days

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Item Bank uses Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) in which participant responses guide the system's choice of subsequent items from the full item bank (29 items in total). Although items differ across respondents taking CAT, scores are comparable across participants.

Measure Description: PROMIS item bank for anxiety assesses the extent to which patients experience anxiety symptoms over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale. PROMIS uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. T-scores range from 20 to 80. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured.

30 days
PROMIS Item Bank v. 1.0 - Emotional Distress - Depression (Adaptive)
Time Frame: 9 days

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Item Bank uses Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) in which participant responses guide the system's choice of subsequent items from the full item bank (28 items in total). Although items differ across respondents taking CAT, scores are comparable across participants.

Measure Description: PROMIS item bank for depression assesses the extent to which patients experience depressive symptoms over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale. PROMIS uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. T-scores range from 20 to 80. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured.

9 days
PROMIS Item Bank v. 1.0 - Emotional Distress - Depression (Adaptive)
Time Frame: 30 days

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Item Bank uses Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) in which participant responses guide the system's choice of subsequent items from the full item bank (28 items in total). Although items differ across respondents taking CAT, scores are comparable across participants.

Measure Description: PROMIS item bank for depression assesses the extent to which patients experience depressive symptoms over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale. PROMIS uses a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. T-scores range from 20 to 80. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured.

30 days
Number of patients admitted
Time Frame: 24 hours
A patient who is admitted to inpatient status during the emergency department visit in which they are enrolled in the study
24 hours
Number of patients admitted
Time Frame: 9 days
A patient who is admitted to inpatient status during the emergency department visit in which they are enrolled in the study or within the follow up time frame
9 days
Number of patients admitted
Time Frame: 30 days
A patient who is admitted to inpatient status during the emergency department visit in which they are enrolled in the study or within the follow up time frame
30 days
Number of patients with hospital admission or death
Time Frame: 9 days
A composite measure of any hospitalizations or death during the index ED visit or within the follow up time frame
9 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Scott M Dresden, MD, MS, Northwestern University Department of Emergency Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 7, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R01HS026489 (U.S. AHRQ Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The Galter Library at Northwestern University has implemented a DigitalHub to facilitate the storage and sharing of research products, including data sets, presentations, documentation, brochures, etc. The DigitalHub also provides digital object identifier so that these resources can be appropriately cited and tracked.

Where feasible we will curate and make available structured data both as de-identified and limited datasets as defined under HIPAA.

Interested collaborators will complete an online collaborative research request survey.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be made available at the completion of the study and will be available for at least 5 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access will be determined by the DigitalHub requirements.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frailty

Clinical Trials on Intervention

3
Subscribe