- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04119479
Interdisciplinary Platform for Rehabilitation Research and Innovative Care of Stroke Patients (ImPRoVe)
January 31, 2021 updated by: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Interdisziplinäre Plattform für Rehabilitationsforschung Und Innovative Versorgung Von SchlaganfallpatientInnen - ImPRoVe Interdisciplinary Platform for Rehabilitation Research and Innovative Care of Stroke Patients - ImPRoVe
Observational study of functional recovery of stroke patients after discharge from rehabilitation
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
Cerebrovascular diseases, such as stroke, are among the greatest challenges in healthcare.
This proves the importance of neuro-rehabilitative research.
Stroke research is often focused on the acute treatment phase as well as the inpatient rehabilitation.
A remaining question is how do stroke patients clinically develop after being discharged from the hospital?
How stable are the achieved rehabilitation effects and how much more clinical improvement is seen in the following time period, especially with regard to ICF functionality?
In this observational longitudinal study, the current practice of neurorehabilitation will be investigated and the influence of motor skills, cognition, care situation, depression, information and fatigue on functional recovery as well as participation, autonomy and quality of life will be evaluated.
Stroke patients will be examined at the end of rehabilitation, after three, six and 12 months.
In addition, a group of chronic patients undergoes the same examinations and thereby represents a comparison group.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
227
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bad Bramstedt, Germany, 24576
- Klinikum Bad Bramstedt - Klinik für Neurologische Rehabilitation
-
Damp, Germany, 24351
- Rehaklinik Damp - Neurologie
-
Geesthacht, Germany, 21502
- Rehaklinik Geesthacht - Neurologie
-
Hamburg, Germany, 20097
- RehaCentrum Hamburg - Neurologische Rehabilitation
-
Hamburg, Germany, 20246
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Neurologie
-
Soltau, Germany, 29614
- MediClin Klinikum Soltau - Neurologische Rehabilitation
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients with the diagnoses cerebral infarction and/or cerebral hemorrhage corresponding to the diagnoses of ICD 10 I61-I69 from rehabilitation phases C and D according to the criteria of the Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft für Rehabilitation (BAR) shall be included at the end of inpatient rehabilitation therapy.
The spectrum of patients recruited should focus on patients who are still of working age (up to the age of 67).
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke according to ICD 10 I61-I69
- Patients in or after completion of rehabilitation phases C and D according to BAR criteria
- Age >= 18
- Sufficient knowledge of German
- Existing declaration of consent
- Deficit still existing (Rankin score of at least 1 at inclusion)
Exclusion Criteria:
- need for care prior stroke
- SAB, craniocerebral trauma, TIA as primary diagnosis
- Severe pre-existing psychiatric disease
- Participation in follow-up examination not possible
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Only
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Compound score
Time Frame: 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Compound outcome-parameter for functional recovery (from upper limb motor scores, e.g.
Fugl-Meyer assessment, grip force, nine-hole peg test).
|
12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Aphasia test
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Standardized test for differential diagnosis Aphasia - no aphasia.
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Apraxia screen of TULIA (AST)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
The Apraxia Screen from TULIA is a short assessment to diagnose apraxia with 12 hand movements, dichotomous scale: 0 = not fulfilled, 1 = fulfilled motion task.
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Autonomy and participation
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Autonomy and participation is measured via different tools, for example with the Index for the Assessment of Health Impairments (IMET) or the subscale Participation/Role function extracted from the Stroke Impact Scale.
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Fatigue scale for motor function and cognition (FSMC)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Fatigue scale for motor and cognitive functions, an assessment of fatigue, containing two subscales (mental and physical fatigue), ranging from 20 (no fatigue at all) to 100 (severest grade of fatigue).
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Fugl-Meyer assessment upper extremity (FMA)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
The section motor function of upper limb is one of five domains, a three-point scale is used for rating performance as 0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially and 2=performs fully, max.
possible score: 66 points.
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Grip and pinch force
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
A dynamometer is used to measure grip strength and a pinch gauge to measure pinch force.
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Index for measuring restrictions on participation (IMET)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
The Index of measurement of participation restrictions (IMET) records patient-related participation as a self-evaluation tool, on a scale from 0 (no impairment) to 10 (no more activity possible).
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Knowledge and information needs
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
A questionnaire developed by the research group (including questions on informativeness and information needs on the topic of stroke).
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Line bisection test (LBS)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
The line bisection test (LBS) is a test to detect the presence of unilateral spatial neglect.
To complete the test, the middle of several horizontal lines must be marked.
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Modified Rankin Scale (MRS)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
The modified Rankin scale (MRS) is a standardized measure that describes the extent of disability after a stroke.
It ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death due to stroke).
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a screening assessment for detecting cognitive impairment, a maximum of 30 points (no restrictions) can be achieved.
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
National institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS, is a score system to quantify the impairment caused by a stroke.
The sum of the values from the investigations results in a maximum of 42 points.
The higher the score, the more extensive the stroke.
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Nine hole peg test (NHPT)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
A timed measure of fine manual dexterity where the patient is instructed to first take nine pegs out of a container and place them afterwards back into the empty holes of the container as quickly as possible.
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) is a screening tool for diagnosing depressivity and includes questions on the nine DSM-IV criteria for the diagnosis of major depression.
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Patient reported health status (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
The EQ-5D questionnaire is a standardized, generic measure of health-related quality of life, it is a self-administered questionnaire.
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Return to work
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
A questionnaire developed by the research group (including questions on occupation and lifestyle).
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Stroke impact scale (SIS)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Measurement of subjective stroke-specific health status, 64 items in eight domains, domain scores range between 0-100, with higher scores represent better health status.
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Time up and go test (TUG)
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
The Timed "Up and Go" test is a clinical test to assess a patient's mobility and risk of falling.
|
3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from rehabilitation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Götz Thomalla, Prof. Dr., Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
- Study Chair: Christian Gerloff, Prof. Dr., Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Birke G, Wolf S, Ingwersen T, Bartling C, Bender G, Meyer A, Nolte A, Ottes K, Pade O, Peller M, Steinmetz J, Gerloff C, Thomalla G. Protocol for a multicenter observational prospective study of functional recovery from stroke beyond inpatient rehabilitation - The Interdisciplinary Platform for Rehabilitation Research and Innovative Care of Stroke Patients (IMPROVE). Neurol Res Pract. 2020 Apr 6;2:10. doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00056-2. eCollection 2020.
- Wolf S, Holm SE, Ingwersen T, Bartling C, Bender G, Birke G, Meyer A, Nolte A, Ottes K, Pade O, Peller M, Steinmetz J, Gerloff C, Thomalla G. Pre-stroke socioeconomic status predicts upper limb motor recovery after inpatient neurorehabilitation. Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):1265-1276. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2059557.
- Ingwersen T, Wolf S, Birke G, Schlemm E, Bartling C, Bender G, Meyer A, Nolte A, Ottes K, Pade O, Peller M, Steinmetz J, Gerloff C, Thomalla G. Long-term recovery of upper limb motor function and self-reported health: results from a multicenter observational study 1 year after discharge from rehabilitation. Neurol Res Pract. 2021 Dec 27;3(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s42466-021-00164-7.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 27, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 31, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
October 31, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 6, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
October 8, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 3, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 31, 2021
Last Verified
January 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IMPROVE
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Yes
IPD Plan Description
Data sharing is planned after main publication of results.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Within 24 months after main publication.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Personal login into UKE data repository.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Study Protocol
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, CryptogenicSingapore, Philippines
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; University of Alabama at BirminghamEnrolling by invitationStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Engagement, Patient | Stroke HemorrhagicUnited States
-
University of MinnesotaAmerican Occupational Therapy FoundationRecruitingStroke | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke IschemicUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Michael Smith Foundation for...RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Chronic StrokeCanada
-
University of CincinnatiMedical University of South Carolina; University of California, Los Angeles; University...RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke HemorrhagicUnited States
-
University of LiegeCompletedStroke, Acute | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, ComplicationBelgium
-
Turkish Stroke Research and Clinical Trials NetworkElectroCore INC; Turkish Neurological SocietyCompletedStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke, HemorrhagicTurkey