Self-Hypnosis for the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Patients With Gynecologic Cancer

March 28, 2024 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Integration of Self-Hypnosis in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program: A Prospective Randomized Trial

This trial studies how well self-hypnosis works in enhancing recovery after surgery in patients with gynecologic cancer. A guided relaxation method called self-hypnosis may help affect how patients feel pain and symptoms after surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To evaluate whether participation in pre-operative self-hypnosis (SH) is feasible and will improve patients' perception of post-surgical pain, after undergoing open gynecologic surgery (laparotomy) on an enhanced recovery pathway.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate whether participation in pre-operative SH is associated with changes in use of opioid medication, including time to first postoperative opioid and total dose of opioids taken (converted to morphine equivalents) and avoidance of opioids.

II. To explore whether participation in pre-operative SH is associated with changes in length of stay.

III. To explore whether there are differences between the two study arms in other common symptoms of women undergoing gynecologic surgery, functional recovery after surgery and quality of life (QOL).

IV. To explore whether expectations regarding symptom management or hypnotic susceptibility are related to or influence the perception of symptoms after surgery.

V. To measure satisfaction with the intervention (patients on arm 2). VI. To perform sub analyses to explore whether other common clinical or demographic factors are potential covariates.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:

I. To compare two different instruments measuring patient reported outcomes in hospital postoperative recovery.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients receive usual care including receipt of multi-modal analgesia and the injection of a local analgesic at the time of surgery on the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway.

ARM II: Patients receive usual care as in Arm I. Patients also receive self-hypnosis guided relaxation by listening to MP3 on the ERAS pathway.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

152

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing an exploratory laparotomy for suspected gynecologic cancer, which includes metastatic disease from neoplasia originating in other organs
  • Planned participation in the Gynecologic Enhanced Recovery Pathway
  • Patient must be able to read, understand, and speak English
  • Consents to being part of a randomized study
  • Patient has physical and mental capabilities to take part in study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Sensitivity to amide-type local anesthetics
  • Patients on long-acting opioid medications, or scheduled (four or more times a day for seven or more days) short-acting opioid medications within the last 30 days
  • Emergency surgery of any type that does not allow for proper time for protocol review by the patient
  • Surgery that involves known/anticipated resection of anterior abdominal wall with plastic surgery reconstruction
  • Patients undergoing known/anticipated anterior abdominal wall hernia repairs
  • Patients undergoing pelvic exenteration
  • Patients with known major psychiatric disease
  • Patients with hearing impairment such that they are unable to hear the intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm I (usual care)
Patients receive usual care including receipt of multi-modal analgesia and the injection of a local analgesic at the time of surgery on the ERAS pathway.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Receive usual care
Other Names:
  • standard of care
  • standard therapy
Experimental: Arm II (usual care, self-hypnosis guided relaxation)
Patients receive usual care as in Arm I. Patients also receive self-hypnosis guided relaxation by listening to MP3 on the ERAS pathway.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Receive usual care
Other Names:
  • standard of care
  • standard therapy
Receive self-hypnosis guided relaxation
Other Names:
  • Hypnosis
  • Clinical Hypnosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of participating in pre-operative self-hypnosis
Time Frame: Up to 1 day
Will assess proportion of participants who listen to the complete audio file in the preoperative holding area.
Up to 1 day
Patients' perception of post-surgical pain
Time Frame: Post-operative day 1 (POD1)
Will summarize POD1 pain scores for each treatment arm using descriptive statistics. Will use a Wilcoxon rank sums test to determine if the POD1 pain scores in the self-hypnosis arm are lower than the usual care arm. Pain intensity score from 0 to 10.
Post-operative day 1 (POD1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Larissa A Meyer, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 11, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-0143 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2019-08222 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malignant Female Reproductive System Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment

3
Subscribe