Efficacy of Rotational Atherectomy System Associated With Drug Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Limb Ischemia (ELLIPSE)

Efficacy of Rotational Atherectomy System Associated With Drug Coated Balloon Angioplasty (With or Without Stent Placement) in the Management of Lower Limb Ischemia (ELLIPSE): "Real Life" Observational Study

Lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a major health problem leading to significant morbidity and even mortality. Patients with superficial femoral artery stenosis make up an important proportion of patients with PAD, and since this type of involvement was reported to be most commonly associated with intermittent claudication, this patient population has been subject to intensive research on methods to prevent disease progression and further complications.

Endovascular treatment has become the first-line treatment for low-complexity femoropopliteal (FP) lesions classified as TASC (Trans Atlantic Inter-Societal Consensus) A and B. Conversely, in case of more extensive lesions (TASC C), this treatment is still under debate because of a primary permeability that is difficult to maintain over time. Recently, studies have shown the interest of drug eluting technologies in the treatment of TASC A & B femoral-popliteal lesions, by significantly improving patency rates compared to uncoated balloons or stents.

In this context, the endovascular treatment of FP complex lesions (TASC C) continues to develop widely.

During endovascular treatment, the quality of the artery preparation has recently been identified as a factor improving outcomes. The dilatation of the artery with an uncoated balloon or POBA (Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty) is the reference method performed before stent placement or drug-coated balloons. However, some new alternatives to prepare the artery have emerged, using no more dilatation but atherectomy (Jetstream™ system).

Atherectomy appears to reduce the risk of dissections and bailout stenting and improve the acute procedural results. Its long term outcome, when associated with drug coated balloons (DCB), has recently been demonstrated in the USA to be superior to angioplasty in a single center study JET-SCE.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the feasibility of atherectomy, using the Jetstream™ artery preparation associated to DCB treatment (Ranger™ Paclitaxel-Coated balloon), in symptomatic patients with claudication (Rutherford 2 and 3) and with complex de novo FP arterial lesions (TASC C).

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

55

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aix-en-Provence, France, 13595
        • Hopital Privé de Provence
      • Avignon, France, 84000
        • Clinique Rhône Durance
      • Draguignan, France, 83300
        • Polyclinique Notre Dame
      • Marseille, France
        • Hopital Saint Joseph
      • Marseille, France, 13000
        • Hôpital Européen
      • Nice, France, 06000
        • Clinique Saint Georges
      • Nîmes, France, 30000
        • Clinique Les Franciscaines
      • Ollioules, France, 83090
        • Polyclinique les Fleurs

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
  • Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
  • Diagnosed with moderate to severe claudication: chronic symptomatic AOMI (Rutherford 2 and 3)
  • Diagnosed with de novo obstructive lesions calcified in the superficial femoral artery or in P1: tight stenosis (> 70%), calcified, layered, length ˃ 10 cm or short calcified occlusions <5 cm from the superior femoral artery and P1.
  • Able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements.
  • Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study.
  • Affiliated to social safety plan of beneficiary under such a plan

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intra stent re-stenosis
  • Recent occlusions, less than 1 month old of SFA and / or P1 (probable thrombus)
  • SFA occlusion, P1 > 5 cm, from origin of SFA.
  • SFA stenosis <10 cm
  • Non calcified stenosis
  • Participants who have participated in another research study involving an investigational product in the past 12 weeks
  • Participant issuing with a safeguard measure of justice (in accordance with the low article L1122-2 of the public health code)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: symptomatic patients with complex de novo FP arterial lesions
in symptomatic patients with claudication (Rutherford 2 and 3) and with complex de novo FP arterial lesions (TASC C).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the feasibility of atherectomy, using the Jetstream™ artery preparation associated to DCB treatment (Ranger™ Paclitaxel-Coated balloon), in symptomatic patients with claudication (Rutherford 2 and 3) and with complex de novo femoropopliteal arterial lesions (TASC C).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Freedom of Target lesion revascularization
Time Frame: 12 months
Percent of patients with freedom of any percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass on target lesions, performed because of restenosis or any other complication involving the target lesion
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary patency
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 2, Month 6, Month12, Month 24
exempt from restenosis of the target lesion during follow-up (Doppler ultrasound)
Baseline, Month 2, Month 6, Month12, Month 24
Primary assisted patency
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 2, Month 6, Month12, Month 24
patency of the target lesion following endovascular reintervention at the target vessel site in case of symptomatic restenosis (Doppler ultrasound)
Baseline, Month 2, Month 6, Month12, Month 24
Secondary patency
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 2, Month 6, Month12, Month 24
patency of the target lesion after treatment of a (re)occlusion of the index lesion
Baseline, Month 2, Month 6, Month12, Month 24
Late Lumen Loss
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 2-Month 6
defined as the difference between the minimal luminal diameter at the end of the procedure and the minimal luminal diameter at follow-up measured by CT Angiography.
Baseline, Month 2-Month 6
technical success of the procedure
Time Frame: Day 0
ability to pass through (intra-luminal passage) and dilate the lesion to obtain residual stenosis under angiography ≤30%.
Day 0
Procedural success
Time Frame: Day 1
technical success without undesirable major event observed within 24 hours post-procedure.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 4, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Vascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty

3
Subscribe