Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control in Newly Diagnosed Pediatric T1D - 4T Study

January 4, 2024 updated by: David Maahs, Stanford University
The 4Ts program encompasses: Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control. These methods will help patients better manage their condition of Type 1 Diabetes with improved patient reported outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The goal of the 4T study is to implement proven methods and emerging diabetes technology into investigator's clinical practice to sustain tight glucose control from the onset of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and optimize patient reported and psychosocial outcomes. The investigators will define a program (4T - Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control) translatable to Pediatric Diabetes clinics in the United States that reduces HbA1c and T1D burden and improves patient well-being.

Study Design: This is a prospective, open-label, pragmatic research study. Two related studies will be performed. In Study 2, a cohort of new onsets (160+) receiving the 4T new onset intervention designed to decrease the rise in HbA1c seen from 4 to 12 months but following a tapered remote monitoring schedule will be compared to internal (4T Pilot and 4T Study 1) and external contemporaneous controls (CMH and DPV).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Steamboat Springs, Colorado, United States, 80487
        • Franziska Katherine Bishop

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 21 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria: (Inclusion criteria includes all youth with new onset T1D seen in the Stanford/Lucile Packard Children's Hospital ages 6 months-21 years of age. We intend to include all possible patients with the goal of maximizing generalizability of the results and 4T program. (NOTE: We will include children and families who speak all languages using the Stanford interpreter services so as to have the greatest generalizability of the research. Questionnaires will only be given to English and Spanish speakers.)

  • All individuals within one month of T1D diagnosis seen at the Stanford Children's Diabetes Clinic
  • Individuals who plan to receive follow up care at the Stanford Children's Diabetes Clinic
  • Individuals who agree to CGM data integration into the EMR for remote monitoring
  • Age: six months to < 21 years of age
  • Patient or guardian must own and operate an Apple compatible device (e.g., iPhone or iPod Touch) to allow for Dexcom app and Apple HealthKit integration and transmission to the hospital server-based remote monitoring system and EHR.

Dr Prahalad's LPCH Auxiliary Fund grant (in addition to the R18) has resources to support iPod Touch purchase for participants who do not have these.

o For the Exercise Ancillary study: 11 to < 21 years of age (the activity tracker is not validated for younger children) English and Spanish-Speaking (Study 2)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetes diagnosis other than T1D
  • Diagnosis of diabetes > one month prior to initial visit
  • Individuals with the intention of obtaining diabetes care at another clinic
  • Individuals who do not consent to CGM use, CGM data integration, remote monitoring
  • Individuals > 21 years of age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: T1D Patients
Participants will wear a Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) with remote data monitoring
CGM data will be used to create customized weekly feedback to the participant/family by secure MyChart message.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in rise of HbA1c
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months post-diagnosis
Rise in HbA1c (a measure of blood sugar levels over the previous 3 months) as a measurement of the effect of 4T education and care. Collected through a blood sample.
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months post-diagnosis

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in CGM Benefits and Burden Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

This tool measures the benefits and burden of Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) device use, and is reported by participants.

PERCEIVED BENEFITS OF CGM SCALE (BenCGM):

Below is a list of things people might think are good about wearing a CGM.

5 - Strongly agree 4 -Agree 3 - Neutral 2 - Disagree

1 - Strongly disagree

Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Change Diabetes Distress Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

This measure is widely used to capture the psychological distress experienced in relation to diabetes, and is reported by participants.

Score Range: 0-4 Interpretation: Higher scores indicates higher distress, a worse outcome

  1. Not a Problem
  2. A Slight Problem
  3. A Moderate Problem
  4. Somewhat Serious Problem
  5. A Serious Problem
  6. A Very Serious Problem
Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Change in Diabetes Technology Attitude Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

This measure has questions on attitudes and use of various general technologies (e.g., smartphone) and diabetes devices, and is reported by participants.

Tool lists statement and participants reports how much they agree with the statement.

1 2 3 4 5 Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree

Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Change in Parental Diabetes Distress Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

The Parental Diabetes Distress Scale (PARENT-DDS) measure is widely used to capture the psychological distress experienced by parents in relation to diabetes, and is reported by participants.

Score Range: 0-4 Interpretation: Higher scores indicates higher distress, a worse outcome

  1. Not a Problem
  2. A Slight Problem
  3. A Moderate Problem
  4. Somewhat Serious Problem
  5. A Serious Problem
  6. A Very Serious Problem
Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Change in Promise Global Health Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

This measure is widely used to capture general and overall health, and is reported by participants.

PROMISE GLOBAL HEALTH SCALES

5, Excellent | 4, Very Good | 3, Good | 2, Fair | 1, Poor

Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Change in Physical Activity, Youth Physical Activity Questionnaire (Y-PAQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months

Youth Physical Activity Questionnaire (Y-PAQ) is a measure used to determine overall physical activity in the last 7 days, and is reported by participants.

Score Range: 1 to 3. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate higher levels of physical activity, a better outcome.

Baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months
Change in Physical Activity, International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months

International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) asks about physical activity and sedentary behavior in the last 7 days, and is reported by participants.

Score Range: 1 to 3. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate higher levels of physical activity, a better outcome.

Baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months
Change in participant Hypoglycemic Fear Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months

People with diabetes worry about hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemic Fear Survey (HFS-II) measure captures those worries and is reported by participants.

Score Range: 0-4 Interpretation: Higher scores indicates higher levels of stress, a worse outcome

Baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months
Change in parent Hypoglycemic Fear Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months

Parents of children with diabetes worry about hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemic Fear Survey (HFS-P) measure captures those worries and is reported by parents of participants.

Score Range: 0-4 Interpretation: Higher scores indicates higher levels of stress, a worse outcome

Baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months
Change in Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months

Self-Efficacy for Exercise (SEE) Scale measures how confident people are in their ability to overcome barriers to exercise.

Total scale is calculated by summing the responses to each question. The scale has a range of total scores from 0-90. A higher score indicates higher self-efficacy for exercise.

Baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months
Change in education exposure to safe exercise strategies
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months
Percentage of participants attending at least one telehealth session and a measure of education exposure to safe exercise strategies
Baseline, 3, 6, and 9 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
T1D Patients receiving 4T education and care monitored on a step-down cadence in study 2, will achieve an HBA1c non-inferior to weekly review
Time Frame: 4-12 month trajectory in study 2
Newly diagnosed T1D patients receiving 4T education and care monitored on a step-down cadence will H1a) achieve a 4-12 month change in HbA1c noninferior to that achieved under weekly review by a margin of 0.1 among 4T Pilot and 4T Study 1 patients and H1b) achieve a lower 4-12 month trajectory relative to external contemporary controls.
4-12 month trajectory in study 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David M Maahs, MD, PhD, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital; Stanford University, School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 18, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 52812
  • 1R18DK122422-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type1diabetes

Clinical Trials on 4T Education and Care

3
Subscribe