Immune Changes in Severe COVID-19 Pulmonary Infections (COVIDIMM)

July 9, 2021 updated by: Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Whole Blood Immune Cells Characterization in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Study

SARS-CoV-2 outbreak causes a spectrum of clinical patterns that varies from asymptomatic infection to mildly symptomatic manifestations and more-severe forms that need intensive care. Until now, the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 virus infection has been poorly reported to help decision for immune modulation therapies. As a consequence, trials have been designed to test both anti-inflammatory molecules as steroids or anti-bodies against IL-6, and others proposing to "boost" immunity with interferon beta based on similar inclusion criteria.

The immune response to infective agents including viruses may have a complex time evolution with early and late phases corresponding to different patterns, oscillating between pro-inflammation and immune-depression. The potential window to improve outcome in COVID-19 by therapeutic intervention aimed at a fine tuning between immune toxicity and immunodepression requires a longitudinal assessment during the course of illness, especially for the patients who develop acute respiratory failure. Immune monitoring of both innate and adaptive immunity would then be essential to appropriately design clinical trials.

The whole blood cells evaluation was recorded according to the time intervals between the onset of symptoms and the sampling after ICU admission. Patients' care was standardized, especially with regard to ventilation, sedation, and antimicrobial treatment.

In this study the investigators prospectively perform a longitudinal study of both innate and adaptive immunity on patients admitted to ICU for an COVID-19 related acute respiratory failure. The data will be analyzed in reference to the onset of initial symptoms and also to the admission in ICU.

The primary end point is the evolution of the characterization of monocytes and their subsets in term of number and expression of HLA-DR. A similar approach is used for lymphocytes and their subtypes with in addition, an ex vivo testing of their capabilities to be stimulated by SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins in term of TNFalpha, INFgamma, and IL1beta production.

The secondary end-point was to test the association with outcomes and other non-specific markers of inflammation as CRP (C reactive protein), PCT (procalcitonin), DDimers and ferritin.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The most severe form of COVID-19 treated in intensive care for acute respiratory failure may have a poor prognosis. Both the level of IL-6 and the severity of the lymphopenia have been associated to the poor prognosis. Better knowledge of the time evolution of the circulating immune cells subpopulations and functions will help to best tailor the treatment: anti-inflammatory strategy at the initial phase might be rapidly shifted to immune stimulation when immunodepression is diagnosed.

It is then essential to assess the patients' immune status using flowcytometry methods to characterize both innate and adaptive immunity of the whole blood circulating immune peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). After cell staining with the adequate cell markers, the flowcytometry (NAVIOS® Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter) allowed to analyze the number and the function of the cells with an adequate gating strategy and the Kaluza® software v2.1 (Beckman Coulter). The data were then grouped by time intervals referring to the onset of symptoms and also to the ICU admission. The trend for innate immunity (monocytes number and subpopulations, HLA-DR expression) and for adaptive immunity (lymphocytes and subpopulations) will be analyzed. Since it is unknown if whole blood CD3/CD4 and CD3/CD8 lymphocytes elicit an "exhaustion" pattern and/or an abnormal response, an ex vivo testing of their reactivity for SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins will be performed. This test of polyfunctionality will characterize the intracellular cytokine expression (IL-1 beta, TNFalpha, and INFgamma) both for CD4 and CD8 T cells.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France, 54511
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nancy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

COVID-19 ICU patients, sedated and mechanically ventilated within the 48 hrs of admission for the first sampling, and monitored all over their ICU stay

Description

Inclusion Criteria: confirmed COVID-19

  • a positive RT- PCR,
  • a highly suggestive thoracic CTScan,
  • severe hypoxemia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Immuno Cohort
COVID-19 confirmed ICU patients, sedated and ventilated, sequential characterization of circulating immune cells over their ICU stay. Every 2 to 3 days, fresh whole blood aliquots from routine blood counts were processed on a Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter) to determine immune cells subpopulations
Cortico Cohort
COVID-19 confirmed ICU patients, sedated and ventilated, sequential characterization of circulating immune cells over their ICU stay. According to RECOVERY study, early routine administration of dexamethasone 6 mg/day over 10 days. Every 2 to 3 days, fresh whole blood aliquots from routine blood counts were processed on a Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter) to determine immune cells subpopulations

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in monocytes HLA-DR expression
Time Frame: through ICU stay, an average of 30 days
circulating immune cell characterization
through ICU stay, an average of 30 days
Changes in lymphocytes subpopulations numbers
Time Frame: through ICU stay, an average of 30 days
circulating immune cell characterization
through ICU stay, an average of 30 days
Changes in monocytes number
Time Frame: through ICU stay, an average of 30 days
circulating immune cell characterization
through ICU stay, an average of 30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TNFalpha level
Time Frame: 4 hours
stimulation by SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins
4 hours
INFgamma level
Time Frame: 4 hours
stimulation by SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins
4 hours
IL1beta level
Time Frame: 4 hours
stimulation by SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins
4 hours
SOFA score
Time Frame: through ICU stay, an average of 30 days
Sequential Organ dysfunction assessement, ranging from 0 (better) to 24 (worst) outcome
through ICU stay, an average of 30 days
number of recorded deaths
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
mortality
through study completion, an average of 6 months
presence of pneumonia
Time Frame: through ICU stay, an average of 30 days
infectious complications
through ICU stay, an average of 30 days
presence of bacteremia
Time Frame: through ICU stay, an average of 30 days
infectious complications
through ICU stay, an average of 30 days
presence of urinary tract infection
Time Frame: through ICU stay, an average of 30 days
infectious complications
through ICU stay, an average of 30 days
C reactive protein
Time Frame: through ICU stay, an average of 30 days
inflammation marker
through ICU stay, an average of 30 days
D Dimers
Time Frame: through ICU stay, an average of 30 days
inflammation marker
through ICU stay, an average of 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: MARIE REINE LOSSER, MD, PhD, Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 30, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHRU NANCY : 2020PI080_1

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on SARS-CoV-2

3
Subscribe