Comparison of Methylprednisolone or Methotrexate in the Maintenance Treatment of Nasal Polyposis

August 26, 2020 updated by: Yesim Tuncok, Dokuz Eylul University

Comparison of Methylprednisolone or Methotrexate With Standard Treatment in the Maintenance Treatment of Medically and Surgically Treated Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRwNP) is an inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa. It is presented with severe stuffiness, nasal discharge, facial pressure/pain, and sleep disorders. It leads to severe inconvenience to social life and the quality of life. The first step standard medical therapy consists of the topical intranasal or systemic corticosteroids. Surgery should be considered in the case of medical treatment failure. However, the recurrences are common after both surgery and medical therapies in severe disease and usually require revision surgeries or high dose corticosteroid regimens. On the contrary, either the revision surgeries or the high dose corticosteroid therapies are not capable of preventing the recurrences, treatment failures. Besides, revision surgeries usually lead to high complication rates and high dose corticosteroids usually cause severe adverse effects. The use of the short course topical intranasal corticosteroids after the surgery is generally advocated for these patients. However, the recurrence rates are still high. Hence a new and effective maintenance treatment algorithm with no severe adverse effects is required.

The hypothesis of the clinical trial is an estimated symptom recovery and superiority in both efficacy and safety by the use of low-dose methylprednisolone or methotrexate as compared to the standard maintenance therapy in treatment-resistant CRwNP patients. Therefore, the results of the present study are believed to provide data on novel maintenance therapy and suggest an alternative to the topical intranasal corticosteroids or the high-risk revision surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Methotrexate, as an anti-inflammatory drug used in animal experiments, and low dose systemic corticosteroid treatments have recently been suggested for the treatment of the CRwNP. Despite the several case reports of methotrexate being used for the severe and treatment-resistant CRwNP, the literature is a lack of clinical trials. Likewise, low-dose corticosteroid regimens have not been tested well contrary to the high dose corticosteroid therapy in the same course of the disease. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to compare a low-dose of methylprednisolone or a low dose of methotrexate treatments with the standard intranasal, topical corticosteroid treatment in human volunteers with medical and surgical treatment-resistant CRwNP.

The present study was planned as a randomized, controlled, triple armed, parallel, open-label phase 2 clinical trial which is conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at Dokuz Eylül University Hospital. Human volunteers with CRwNP who are resistant to the medical and surgical therapies were recruited to the study. After randomization, the patients were divided into three groups including 14 volunteers in each study groups and 13 in the control group. One of the study groups was take methotrexate (n=14, eight weeks) and the other was take methylprednisolone (n=14, eight weeks). Each patient were evaluated by endoscopic examination, the nasal air-flow, the smell threshold, and the blood biochemistry both before and after the medications.

Efficacy goals of the study are located at below:

  1. Primary efficacy variable: Lund-Kennedy endoscopic grading system (NPS)
  2. Secondary efficacy variables: Total visual analog scale (VAS) score; the Turkish version of the Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22); sum score of the peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) and butanol olfactory threshold test (BuOT) obtained from bilateral nasal cavities; serum total immunoglobulin E (IgE) level; and the presence of peripheral eosinophilia (PE, > 500/mcl) in blood samples.

Safety goal of the study was evaluated by the examination of the adverse event reports and the number of patients who experienced adverse events.

Statistical analysis: The normality of the continuous variables was evaluated by the Shapiro Wilk test. Comparison of age was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Repeated measurements in three groups were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA for 3×3 model with a within and a between-subjects factor. The results were assessed with a 95% confidence interval and at the p<0.05 significance level.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • General
      • İzmir, General, Turkey, 35340
        • Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRS) with nasal polyposis which does not respond to maintenance treatment with topical nasal corticosteroid treatment after medical and surgical treatment,
  • 18-75 years of age from both sexes,
  • Signed an informed consent form,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic oral methylprednisolone or systemic oral methotrexate treatment for another reason,
  • Has a known malignant disease,
  • Have contraindications or allergies to the use of excipients in oral methotrexate or preparations,
  • Contraindications or allergies in the use of oral methylprednisolone or excipients contained in the preparation,
  • Have contraindications or allergies to the use of excipients contained in nasal topical mometasone furoate or its preparation,
  • Pregnancy status,
  • Having a pregnancy plan,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Methotrexate
10 mg Emthexate, PO, once a week during 8 weeks
After randomization, the patients were divided into three groups including 14 volunteers in each study groups and 11 in the control group. One of the study groups was take methotrexate (n=14, eight weeks) and the other was take methylprednisolone (n=14, eight week)
Other Names:
  • Methotrexate
Active Comparator: Methylprednisolone
8 mg/day Prednol, PO, for 8 weeks
After randomization, the patients were divided into three groups including 14 volunteers in each study groups and 11 in the control group. One of the study groups was take methotrexate (n=14, eight weeks) and the other was take methylprednisolone (n=14, eight week)
Other Names:
  • Methylprednisolone
Active Comparator: Control
200 mcg/day, intranasal mometasone furoate, for 8 weeks
After randomization, the patients were divided into three groups including 14 volunteers in each study groups and 11 in the control group. One of the study groups was take methotrexate (n=14, eight weeks) and the other was take methylprednisolone (n=14, eight week)
Other Names:
  • Corticosteroid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lund-Kennedy endoscopic grading system (NPS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline NPS at 4th and 8th weeks visits
Occurrence of polyps, edema, discharge, scar and crusting parameters were scored according to the 0-1-2 rating system.
Change from baseline NPS at 4th and 8th weeks visits

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline VAS at 4th and 8th weeks visits
Smell, nasal discharge, nasal obstruction, facial pressure, and headache were scored between 0 (no complaint) and 10 (most annoying)
Change from baseline VAS at 4th and 8th weeks visits
Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22)
Time Frame: Change from baseline SNOT-22 at 4th and 8th visits
Change in the 22-item symptom questionnaire scale used to evaluate the presence of symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis and their effect on quality of life
Change from baseline SNOT-22 at 4th and 8th visits
Peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF)
Time Frame: Change from baseline PNIF at 4th and 8th visits
During inspiration, nasal peak airflows were detected with the nasal mask attached to the Clement-Clark peak flow-meter. Right and left nostrils of each patient were evaluated separately.
Change from baseline PNIF at 4th and 8th visits
Butanol olfactory threshold test (BuOT)
Time Frame: Change from baseline BuOT at 4th and 8th visits
The odor thresholds of the patients who smelled the bottle containing 9 different concentrations of butanol between 0.00061 and 4% were determined.
Change from baseline BuOT at 4th and 8th visits
Total immunoglobulin E (IgE) level
Time Frame: Change from baseline total IgE level at 4th and 8th visits
To detect serum IgE level in the blood IgE level measured in peripheral blood
Change from baseline total IgE level at 4th and 8th visits
Presence of peripheral eosinophilia (PE, > 500/mcl) in blood samples
Time Frame: Change from baseline presence of peripheral eosinophilia at 4th and 8th visits
Detection of eosinophil count> 500 / mcl in blood samples
Change from baseline presence of peripheral eosinophilia at 4th and 8th visits

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yesim Tuncok, MD, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 2, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 12, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 5, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nasal Polyposis

Clinical Trials on Emthexate

3
Subscribe