Safety and Performance of the Polaris® 24 Adjustable Valve System in Hydrocephalus Patients' Treatment (SAPPHYRE)

June 8, 2021 updated by: Sophysa
The SAPPHYRE study is an ambispective (retrospective and prospective) PMCF study with the objective to evaluate the safety and performance of the Polaris® 24 adjustable valve system in the treatment of 126 patients with hydrocephalus.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The SAPPHYRE study is an ambispective (retrospective and prospective), non-interventional, multicenter, post-market clinical follow-up study. The study objective is to evaluate the safety and performance of Sophysa's CE marked Polaris® 24 adjustable valve system in the treatment of hydrocephalus by shunting the cerebrospinal fluid. It is expected to recruit 126 patients in two-year. Patients will be followed-up up to 5 years post-procedure.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

126

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France, 13385
        • Not yet recruiting
        • La Timone Children's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Didier Scavarda, Prof
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Recruiting
        • La Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Bertrand Mathon, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults, children and neonates, regardless of gender with hydrocephalus.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient implanted with the Polaris® 24 adjustable valve system for the following reasons:

    • Primo implant of a valve shunt-based derivation system, or as a
    • Replacement of another valve -based shunt system, or
    • Endoscopic ventriculostomy (EVT) failure
  • Patient having given his/her informed consent prior to inclusion in this study, as per local regulations

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed or suspected infections along the length of the shunt (meningitis, ventriculitis, peritonitis, septicemia or bacteremia) or any infection present in any part of the body
  • Patient on anticoagulant therapy, or presenting with bleeding diathesis, or with haemorrhagic CSF, as the presence of blood in the system could lead to an obstruction in the system
  • Ventriculo-atrial shunts in patient suffering from congenital cardiopathies or other malformations of the cardio-pulmonary system

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device-related SAE / complications
Time Frame: 1 year
Primary safety outcome will be assessed by the incidence of device-related serious adverse events / complications
1 year
Valve replacement
Time Frame: 1 year
Primary performance outcome will be assessed by the incidence of valve replacements
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All adverse events / complications
Time Frame: Two (2) years post procedure, and yearly thereafter, up to five (5) years post implantation
Long term safety will be assessed by the incidence of all adverse events/complications
Two (2) years post procedure, and yearly thereafter, up to five (5) years post implantation
Valve replacement
Time Frame: Two (2) years post procedure, and yearly thereafter, up to five (5) years post implantation
Incidence of valve replacements
Two (2) years post procedure, and yearly thereafter, up to five (5) years post implantation
Implant procedure success
Time Frame: 0 day (post-procedure)
Implant procedure success, defined as no immediate re-intervention post-procedure
0 day (post-procedure)
Change of clinical status scores
Time Frame: One (1) year, two (2) years, and yearly thereafter, up to five (5) years post implantation
Improvement of the following clinical status scores compared to baseline: the Modified Rankin Scale (for adults and children) and the Lansky Performance Scale (for children < 16 years old only)
One (1) year, two (2) years, and yearly thereafter, up to five (5) years post implantation
Evolution of Clinical symptoms
Time Frame: One (1) year, two (2) years, and and yearly thereafter, up to five (5) years post implantation
Clinical symptoms will be assessed according to a 4-grade scale (excellent, good, unchanged, worsened)
One (1) year, two (2) years, and and yearly thereafter, up to five (5) years post implantation
MRI stability
Time Frame: One (1) year, two (2) years, and yearly thereafter, up to five (5) years post implantation
MRI (1.5Tesla or 3Tesla) stability of the pressure adjustment
One (1) year, two (2) years, and yearly thereafter, up to five (5) years post implantation
Valve pressure adjustment
Time Frame: (if applicable), throughout the follow-up period: One (1) year, two (2) years, and and yearly thereafter, up to five (5) years post implantation
If required by patient's condition, the physician will adjust the valve pressure with the adjustment kit provided with the Polaris 24 valve. Physician will evaluate the ease of reading and adjusting of the valve pressure (from easy to difficult)
(if applicable), throughout the follow-up period: One (1) year, two (2) years, and and yearly thereafter, up to five (5) years post implantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Didier Scavarda, Prof, La Timone Children's Hospital - Paediatrics Neurosurgery Department

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 4, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hydrocephalus

3
Subscribe