Influence of Different Ankle Positions on Nerve Conduction Parameters of Deep Peroneal Nerve

January 27, 2023 updated by: Mahmoud Salah Abd-Elfattah, Cairo University

BACKGROUND:

The deep peroneal nerve arises as a branch of the common peroneal nerve which courses around the neck of the fibula. The motor component of deep peroneal nerve is responsible for innervating the anterior compartment of the lower leg which includes the tibialis anterior, extensor hallucis longus, extensor digitorum longus, and peroneus tertius muscles.

Nerve conduction velocity shortly known as "NCV" tests are used determine the speed of the electrical signals moving along a specific peripheral nerve .This will be helpful in localizing the site of entrapment of peripheral nerves and useful for assessing both recovery and prognosis of any injury to peripheral nervesthere are numerous aspects that could influence nerve conduction study.

Although changes in joint position have been reported in several studies to affect nerve conduction velocity of peripheral nerves. the effect of changing ankle joint position on deep peroneal NCV has not been repor Purpose

This study will investigate the effect of different ankle positions on:

  1. Deep peroneal nerve distal motor latency across ankle joint.
  2. Deep peroneal nerve sensory onset latency across ankle joint

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

31healthy subjects of both genders with age ranging from 20to 40years old were examined for motor distal latency and sensory onset latency at three different ankle positions :neutral,20degrees dorsiflexion and 40degrees plantar flexion

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

31

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Aga, Egypt, 055555
        • Mahmoud Salah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

31 healthy subjects of both genders will be recruited to participate in this study

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Healthy subjects.
  • Age ranges from 20 to 40 years because longer latencies and slower nerve conduction velocity are seen significantly with increasing age.
  • All participants will be selected with body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 24.9kg/cm2 .

Exclusion criteria:

  • Elderly subjects.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Subjects with history of or risk factors for peripheral nerve lesions.
  • Obese subjects.
  • Subjects with any foot deformity.
  • History of lower limb fractures.
  • History of surgery to lower limbs
  • Diabetic patients.
  • Patients with cardiovascular disorders.
  • Hypertensive patients.
  • Women wearing high heeled shoes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Deep peroneal nerve motor distal latency
Time Frame: 30 minutes for each participant
Motor distal latency: It is the time between the distal stimulus and the onset of compound muscle action potential(CMAP)at recording muscles
30 minutes for each participant
Deep peroneal nerve sensory onset latency
Time Frame: 30 minutes for each participant
: It is the time taken from the stimulus artifact to the initial negative deflection of the sensory nerve action potential (SNAP)
30 minutes for each participant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mahmoud Salah, Faculty of physical therapy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 3, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 26, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P.T.REC/012/004076

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Subjects

3
Subscribe