Epidemiological Study of the Markers of Aging in the Cohort of Patient HIV in Brest (VIHVA)

August 13, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Brest

RATIONALE: HIV pathology has been associated with accelerated aging of the infected organism, with no known knowledge of virus, immunosuppression, immune response stimulation, antiretroviral toxicity, and "classic" risks. The data are in good standing from a multicenter cohort with high statistical power but very heterogeneous and not exhaustive. A complementary approach by small, comprehensive cohorts is desirable.

POPULATION CONCERNED: HIV-positive persons OBJECTIVE To describe the aging of the physiological functions of people living with HIV.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES Assess the determinants (virus / HAART / Immunity / environment) Compare to the general population (historical comparisons) Compare to main body functions MAIN EVALUATION CRITERIA respiratory functional tests, memory test, IMTc, ECG, creatininemia, cancer, Fibroscan, bone densitometry...

SECONDARY EVALUATION CRITERIA Age, sex, phototype, CD4 lymphocytes count, viral load, nadir CD4, antiretroviral exposure, alcohol, tobacco ...

METHODOLOGY Monocentric retrospective study STATISTICS Frailty model, chi2 test, test U INCLUSION CRITERIA Seropositive for HIV, age>18 years Follow-up at least once in the Internal Medicine department between 1995 and 2018 CRITERIA OF EXCLUSION Refusal of the patient or unreachable patient NUMBER OF PATIENTS Between 200 and 300 CALENDAR Duration of inclusions: 3 months Duration of participation of the patient: 20 years (retrospectives ...) Duration of the study: 1 year

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Rational:

HIV pathology has been associated with an accelerated aging of the infected organism, without anyone knowing how to do it:

  • the direct toxicity of the virus;
  • CD4 immuno-depletion and its corollary of opportunistic infections, modification of microbiota, ... ;
  • Reactive immune stimulation with chronic inflammation;
  • the toxicity of antiretrovirals, particularly nucleoside analogues, responsible for acquired mitochondrial cytopathy;
  • And, finally, specific environmental factors related to either the mode of acquisition of the infection (transfusion, drug addiction ...), or the frailty induced by the pathology (psychic or social).

The discordant data of the great cohorts must be supported by cohorts of smaller sizes, more exhaustive, both in item and data, more homogeneous in their social determinants.

Population and Methods:

This retrospective monocentric epidemiological study has several objectives:

  • Description of the aging of the population followed on several organs
  • Comparison with the data of the closest general population geographically, sociologically and temporally;
  • Comparison of the relative age of the different organs with each other: synchronous aging or not?
  • Evaluation of a screening / surveillance strategy adapted to local epidemiology

    1. Collect aging data from the functions:

      Kidney: creatinine, calculated clearance of creatinine, microalbuminuria Liver: cytolysis, cholestasis, Fibroscan * pulmonary: pulmonary function tests Heart: ultrasound, ECG Brain: memory disorder screening test Psychism: depression test Musculoskeletal: Bone Densitometry, Calcium, Phosphoremia, Vitamin D Vascular: carotid intima-media thickness

    2. Evaluate the potential determinants:

      Demographic: gender, age, phototype Viral: subtypes, time to infection, undetectable delay, viral load zenith Immune: lymphocyte immunophenotyping, nadir CD4 Iatrogen: antiretrovirals (year / patient exposure, compliance), other treatment Toxic: self-administered questionnaire (alcohol, tobacco and others), expired Hb CO, gammaGT, urinary toxicity test

    3. Correlate aging data of each organ with determinants, correlate between organs with and without adjustment to determinants
    4. Look for the closest population data in the literature and compared with those of the VIHVA cohort.

Ethical considerations:

The data of VIHVA study, approved by the local ethics committee (CCPPRB), was collected upon obtaining the non-opposition of patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

213

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brest, France, 29200
        • Internal Medicine Department of University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All persons followed between 2003 to 2018 in the one center (Internal Médicine) of the West Brittany cohort

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV positive persons followed in Internal Medicine departement of Brest University Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • opposition of the study
  • <18 ans

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
renal aging
Time Frame: yearly
creatinin level, creatinin clearance, microalbuminuria
yearly
pulmonary aging
Time Frame: at last one
respiratory functional test
at last one
liver aging
Time Frame: at last one
elastometry (Fibroscan*)
at last one
neurological aging
Time Frame: at last one
memory tests
at last one
vascular aging
Time Frame: at last one
intima-media thickness, systolic and diastolic blood pressure
at last one
Bone aging
Time Frame: at last one
osteodensitometry
at last one
heart aging
Time Frame: at last one
ECG, echography
at last one

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Luc de Saint-Martin, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Brest

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 8, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VIHVA 2016.CE31

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Subscribe