Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Drug Utilization of Boceprevir and Clinical Management of Health Outcomes of Interest in Chronic Hepatitis C Participants (P08518)

28. Juli 2016 aktualisiert von: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

An Observational Post-Authorization Safety Study (PASS) of Victrelis™ (Boceprevir) Among Chronic Hepatitis C Patients

This is an observational prospective follow-up study to assess the utilization of boceprevir and the management of pre-specified health outcomes of interest (HOIs) under conditions of routine clinical care in participants with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype 1.

As an observational prospective study, this study is not intended to change the participant/physician relationship, nor influence the physician's drug prescription or therapeutic management of the participant. No individual administration of any therapeutic or prophylactic agent is assigned in this protocol, and there are no procedures required as part of this protocol. Physician choice of the drug used to treat the participant is based on clinical judgment alone.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Studientyp

Beobachtungs

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

713

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Probenahmeverfahren

Nicht-Wahrscheinlichkeitsprobe

Studienpopulation

Adults 18 years or older with CHC genotype 1

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype-1 infection
  • Untreated or failed previous therapy
  • Initiated a new treatment regimen after the study implementation date at their site
  • Agrees to participate in the study by giving written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Taking part in a clinical trial or in any study where a participant is receiving care outside of normal clinical practice for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Beobachtungsmodelle: Kohorte
  • Zeitperspektiven: Interessent

Kohorten und Interventionen

Gruppe / Kohorte
Boceprevir + PR
CHC genotype-1 participants included in study and prescribed boceprevir plus PR as routine clinical management.
Telaprevir + PR
CHC genotype-1 participants included in study and prescribed telaprevir plus PR as routine clinical management.
PR Alone
CHC genotype-1 participants included in study and prescribed PR alone as routine clinical management.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Percentage of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone (Drug Utilization Pattern)
Zeitfenster: Up to 37 months
The percentage of CHC participants initiating boceprevir plus PR treatment, telaprevir plus PR treatment, or PR treatment alone was determined from a Drug Utilization questionnaire that was administered to physicians using an electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) to collect site level information and reported with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 37 months
Baseline Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Weight
Zeitfenster: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline mean weight (standard deviation [SD]) in kilograms (Kg) was recorded from the eCRF.
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Height
Zeitfenster: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline mean height (SD) in centimeters (cm) was recorded from the eCRF.
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Body Mass Index (BMI)
Zeitfenster: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline mean body mass index (SD) in Kg/m^2 was recorded from the eCRF.
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline Disease Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Baseline Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype
Zeitfenster: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline HCV genotype was recorded from the eCRF and the number of participants who were 1a genotype, 1b genotype, or unknown/other was reported.
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline Disease Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Baseline Viral Load
Zeitfenster: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Participant baseline HCV viral load was recorded from the eCRF and categorized as either "Low" (<800,000 IU/mL or <2,000,000 RNA copies/mL) or "High" (≥800,000 IU/mL or ≥2,000,000 RNA copies/mL).
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline Disease Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Baseline Grade for Child-Pugh Score
Zeitfenster: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
The Child-Pugh Score is used to determine the prognosis of chronic liver disease, in particular cirrhosis. It is classified into Classes A (best prognosis) to C (worst prognosis). Child-Pugh scores assessed within 3 months before CHC treatment regimen initiation were recorded from the eCRF, and the number of participants who were Grade A, Grade B, Grade C, not assessed, or unknown whether assessed were reported.
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Percentage of Anemia Episodes Managed by at Least One Clinical Intervention
Zeitfenster: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dL) was considered a Health Outcome of Interest (HOI) for this study. Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of anemia in participants could include erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA), blood transfusion, drug dose reduction, other treatment, and CHC treatment regimen modifications (drug dose reduction, drug discontinuation, and drug interruption). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive). The percentage of anemia episodes that were managed by at least one intervention is reported for each CHC treatment exposure group with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Anemia Episodes Managed by Each Clinical Intervention Out of All Managed Anemia Episodes
Zeitfenster: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen

Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of anemia in participants could include erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA), blood transfusion (BT), other treatment (OT), and CHC treatment regimen modifications including drug dose reduction (DDR), drug discontinuation (DD), and drug interruption (DI). Interventions could be used in combination (e.g. ESA plus blood transfusion) and more than one treatment modification could have been performed. For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive).

For each CHC treatment exposure group, the percentage of anemia episodes managed by a particular intervention are reported out of the total number of managed anemia episodes with data available for that intervention (i.e. anemia episodes with missing data for an intervention were excluded).

Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Grade 3/4 Neutropenia Episodes Managed by at Least One Clinical Intervention
Zeitfenster: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Grade 3/4 neutropenia (Grade 3: neutrophil count 0.5 - <0.75 × 10^9/L, Grade 4: <0.5 × 10^9/L) was considered a HOI for this study. Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of grade 3/4 neutropenia in participants could include Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use and CHC treatment regimen modifications (drug dose reduction, drug discontinuation, and drug interruption). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive). The percentage of grade 3/4 neutropenia episodes that were managed by at least one intervention is reported for each CHC treatment exposure group with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Grade 3/4 Neutropenia Episodes Managed by Each Clinical Intervention Out of All Managed Episodes
Zeitfenster: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen

Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of grade 3/4 neutropenia in participants could include Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use, other treatment (OT), and CHC treatment regimen modifications including drug dose reduction (DDR), drug discontinuation (DD), and drug interruption (DI). More than one treatment modification could have been performed. For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive).

For each CHC treatment exposure group, the percentage of grade 3/4 neutropenia episodes managed by a particular intervention are reported out of the total number of managed grade 3/4 neutropenia episodes with data available for that intervention (i.e. grade 3/4 neutropenia episodes with missing data for an intervention were excluded).

Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Grade 3/4 Thrombocytopenia Episodes Managed by at Least One Clinical Intervention
Zeitfenster: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (Grade 3: platelet count 25 - <50 × 10^9/L, Grade 4: <25 × 10^9/L) was considered a HOI for this study. Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in participants could include thrombopoietin, platelet transfusion, other treatment, and CHC treatment regimen modifications (drug dose reduction, drug discontinuation, and drug interruption). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive). The percentage of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia episodes that were managed by at least one intervention is reported for each CHC treatment exposure group with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Grade 3/4 Thrombocytopenia Episodes Managed by Each Clinical Intervention Out of All Managed Episodes
Zeitfenster: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen

Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in participants could include thrombopoietin (TPO), platelet transfusion (PT), other treatment (OT) , and CHC treatment regimen modifications including drug dose reduction (DDR), drug discontinuation (DD), and drug interruption (DI). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive).

For each CHC treatment exposure group, the percentage of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia episodes managed by a particular intervention are reported out of the total number of managed grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia episodes with data available for that intervention (i.e. grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia episodes with missing data for an intervention were excluded).

Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Serious Rash Episodes Managed by at Least One Clinical Intervention
Zeitfenster: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Serious rash was considered a HOI for this study and included rash > 50% of body surface area, rash associated with significant systemic symptoms, or rash resulting in hospitalization or urgent care visit. Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of serious rash in participants could include topical corticosteroid use, intravenous (IV) and/or oral corticosteroids, emollients/moisturizers, antihistamines, other treatment, and CHC treatment regimen modifications (drug dose reduction, drug discontinuation, and drug interruption). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive). The percentage of serious rash episodes that were managed by at least one intervention is reported for each CHC treatment exposure group with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Serious Rash Episodes Managed by Each Clinical Intervention Out of All Managed Episodes
Zeitfenster: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen

Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of serious rash in participants could include topical corticosteroid (TC), intravenous (IV) and/or oral (PO) corticosteroids (IV/PO CS), emollients/moisturizers (E/M), antihistamines (AH), other treatment (OT), and CHC treatment regimen modifications including drug dose reduction (DDR), drug discontinuation (DD), and drug interruption (DI). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive).

For each CHC treatment exposure group, the percentage of serious rash episodes managed by a particular intervention are reported out of the total number of managed serious rash episodes with data available for that intervention (i.e. serious rash episodes with missing data for an intervention were excluded).

Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Incidence of Anemia, Grade 3/4 Neutropenia, Grade 3/4 Thrombocytopenia, and Serious Skin Rash
Zeitfenster: Up to 48 weeks of treatment
The incidence (events per 1000 participant-days) of the protocol-defined HOIs (anemia, grade 3/4 neutropenia, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, and serious skin rash) was calculated over the 48-week period following the start of CHC treatment exposure. All protocol-defined HOIs were taken into account (serious and non-serious HOIs). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive). The incidence per 1000 participant-days of anemia, grade 3/4 neutropenia, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, and serious skin rash were reported by CHC treatment group of exposure with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 48 weeks of treatment

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. Mai 2012

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Juli 2015

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Juli 2015

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

2. Februar 2012

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

28. Februar 2012

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

6. März 2012

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Schätzen)

16. September 2016

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

28. Juli 2016

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2016

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • P08518
  • EP08043.001 (Andere Kennung: Merck Epidemiology Number)
  • SCH 503034 P08518 (Andere Kennung: Schering Protocol Number)
  • MK-3034-072 (Andere Kennung: Merck Protocol Number)

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Hepatitis C chronisch

3
Abonnieren