Multi-centre UK Study of the Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitor Donepezil in Early Dementia Associated With Parkinson's Disease (MUSTARDD-PD)

September 21, 2017 updated by: Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust

To demonstrate the superiority of donepezil over placebo in improving cognitive function, neuropsychiatric burden and functional ability in people with Parkinson's disease and mild dementia after 24 months of treatment.

To demonstrate the superiority of donepezil over placebo in improving patient and carer quality of life and to establish the cost-effectiveness of donepezil.

To determine the instrument most suitable for evaluating change in cognition in people with Parkinson's disease and mild dementia.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bath, United Kingdom, BA1 3NG
        • Royal United Hospital (RUH) Bath NHS
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B18 7QH
        • Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
      • Bristol, United Kingdom, BS10 5NB
        • Steps and Pines, Southmead Hospital
      • Bury, United Kingdom, BL9 7TD
        • Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0PY
        • Cambridge Centre for Brain Repair
      • Derby, United Kingdom, DE22 3NE
        • Dr Lakmali Sugathapala
      • Dorset, United Kingdom, BH23 2JX
        • Royal Bournemouth & Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom, G51 4TF
        • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
      • Gloucester, United Kingdom, Gloucester
        • Dr Pippa Metcalf
      • Llandudno, United Kingdom, LL30 1LB
        • Llandudno Hospital, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board & School of Medical Sciences
      • London, United Kingdom, SE59RS
        • King's College Hospital NHS Foundtion Trust
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M8 5RB
        • Manchester Mental Health & Social Care NHS Trust
      • Milton Keynes, United Kingdom, MK6 5LD
        • Milton Keynes
      • Newport, United Kingdom, NP20 2UB
        • Royal Gwent Hospital
      • Northumberland, United Kingdom, NE29 8NH
        • North Tyneside General Hospital
      • Norwich, United Kingdom, NR4 7UY
        • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
      • Oxford, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
        • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
      • Plymouth, United Kingdom, PL6 8DH
        • Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust
      • Poole, United Kingdom, BH15 2JB
        • Poole Hospital NHS Trust
      • Southampton, United Kingdom, SO16 6YD
        • Southampton General Hospital
      • Surrey, United Kingdom, KT16 0PZ
        • Dr Dhakam
    • Tyne and Wear
      • Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom, NE4 5PL
        • Newcastle

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. A diagnosis of Parkinson's disease according to UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank Criteria. These criteria are in standard use throughout the NHS in the UK and were supported by the NICE guidelines.
  2. People with mild dementia associated with PD, where the patient and/or their family have become aware of cognitive with or without behavioural symptoms that are causing functional impairment. "Dementia" will be defined according to recently published Movement Disorder Society Task Force criteria for dementia associated with Parkinson's Disease and "operationalised" using the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE-R). The ACE-R permits some description of the dementia profile and also quantifies global impairment. It is increasingly used by clinicians in the UK to identify demented subjects, is relatively quick to perform (15 minutes or so), requires no specific training and produces a total score (0-100), from which the MMSE (0-30) can also be extracted. Participants will have an ACE-R of 88 or less. If this criterion is met, subjects will be further assessed using the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (DRS-2). An age- and education-corrected total DRS-2 score of less than 8 but greater than 4 (corresponding to between the 6th and 28th percentile) will be used to define "mild" dementia".
  3. Community-living and a spouse, close relative or well established carer to accompany the subject to act as an informant.
  4. Where relevant, women of child bearing potential must be using adequate contraception for duration of study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Dementia that develops within one year of the onset of motor symptoms. The reason for this "one year rule" is to specifically exclude participants with Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB). This exclusion criterion is consistent with recommendations made in the Movement Disorder Society Dementia Task Force Diagnostic Criteria and the Third Report of the DLB Consortium.
  2. People with such severe motor disability, or who are so impaired in their activities of daily living from other aspects of their PD, that it would interfere with cognitive and global assessments.
  3. Severe current depressive episode. Low mood may impact upon accurate cognitive assessment and major depression is therefore listed as a feature which, when present, makes it impossible to reliably diagnose PDD in the Movement disorder Society Task Force PDD Criteria. This will be operationalised using the self-completed Beck Depression Inventory and a cut-off score of 13, as recommended by a recent Movement Disorder Society Task Force report. The BDI score is considered robust in the face of mild to moderate cognitive impairment.
  4. Unstable significant medical co-morbidity.
  5. Patient receiving an anticholinergic drug for control of parkinsonian motor symptoms.
  6. Previous exposure to a cholinesterase inhibitor
  7. Presence of a condition that is contraindicative to use of donepezil (including a clinically significant cardiac conduction defect found in patient history or from screening ECG); see SmPC (Appendix W) for details.
  8. Allergy/hypersensitivity to excipients of donepezil or placebo
  9. Patient receiving the N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist memantine.
  10. Previous neurosurgery for Parkinson's disease. This will apply to only a small minority of predominantly younger cases. The main reason for this exclusion relates to ongoing uncertainty over the potential confounding effects of deep brain stimulation upon both mood and cognition.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Donepezil
5mg of Donepezil for the first 8 weeks raising to 10mg thereafter if patient adjusted to 5mg dose. 10mg does continues for the remainder of the study.
5mg donepezil daily for first 8 weeks and then increased to 10mg daily for the remainder of the study.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Patient commences medication to match appearance of 5mg donepezil for first 8 weeks then 10mg for the remainder of the study.
5mg donepezil daily for first 8 weeks and then increased to 10mg daily for the remainder of the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To demonstrate the superiority of donepezil over placebo in improving cognitive function, neuropsychiatric burden and functional ability in people with Parkinson's disease and mild dementia after 24 months of treatment.
Time Frame: After 24 month of treatment
After 24 month of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To demonstrate the superiority of donepezil over placebo in improving patient and carer quality of life and to establish the cost-effectiveness of donepezil.
Time Frame: 26, 52 and 104 weeks
26, 52 and 104 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: David J Burn, Professor, Newcastle University
  • Study Director: Roger A Barker, Dr, Cambridge University
  • Study Director: Belinda Braithwaite, Mrs, lay person
  • Study Director: Alistair Burns, Professor, School of Community Based Medicine, University of Manchester
  • Study Director: Carl E Clarke, Professor, Clarke
  • Study Director: Elaine McColl, Professor, University of Newcastle Upon-Tyne
  • Study Director: John V Hindle, Dr, Llandudno Hospital & University of College Wales
  • Study Director: Martin Knapp, Professor, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Study Director: Andrew J Lees, Professor, University College, London
  • Study Director: Iracema Leroi, DR, Lancashire Care Trust, Royal Blackburn Hospital
  • Study Director: Ian G McKeith, Professor, Newcastle University
  • Study Director: John T O'Brien, Professor, Newcastle University
  • Study Director: Keith Wheatley, Professor, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham
  • Study Director: Ian N Steen, Dr, University of Newcastle Upon-Tyne
  • Study Director: Jennifer Wilkinson, Mrs, University of Newcastle Upon-Tyne
  • Study Director: Sharon Erb, Mrs, University of Newcastle Upon-Tyne
  • Study Director: Daniel Weintraub, Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
  • Study Director: Lynn Rochester, Professor of Human Movement Science, Institute for Ageing and Health, Newcastle University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

November 17, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on Donepezil

3
Subscribe