Car Safety Seat and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

January 25, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Antwerp

The Car Safety Seat; Cause of Increased Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Infants?

What's known? Prone position is no longer a treatment option for GERD because of the association with SIDS. Originally, positioning in an infant seat was recommended for infants with GERD. However, Orenstein proved this position has a detrimental effect on GER, compared to prone positioning.

What's new? Positioning in an infant seat caused no increase in GER, compared with the supine 15 degrees anti-Trendelenburg position. Except for the number of long reflux episodes, which was significantly higher in the car safety seat. Larger trials are needed for decisive conclusions.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVE - Over the past few decades, an increase in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been seen in infants. This increase may be due to a continuous growth in the use of car safety seats. The objective of this study was to evaluate this hypothesis by comparing positioning in a car safety seat with the supine 15 degrees anti-Trendelenburg position.

PATIENTS AND METHODS - From October 2008 till August 2010 a crossover, randomized, controlled trial was performed on 31 infants, aged two weeks to six months old, who were suspected to have GERD. Twenty hour continuous esophageal pH monitoring was used to compare both positions.

RESULTS - The results of this trial demonstrated no differences between positioning in a car safety seat and in supine 15 degrees anti-Trendelenburg position for the reflux index, the duration of the longest reflux episode and number of reflux episodes (PRI = NS; PLRE = NS respectively PNRE = NS). Only the difference between the number of reflux episodes lasting longer than five minutes was significant (PNRE5 = 0,05).

CONCLUSIONS - The results of this study suggest that an increase in GERD is not caused by a growing use of car safety seats in infants. As the sample size was limited, larger trials are needed.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Antwerp, Belgium, 2650
        • Antwerp University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 10 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria were: healthy term-born infants between two weeks and six months old suspected to have GERD, in general good health. The infants did not need to meet the criteria for GERD to be eligible.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria were infants with psychomotor retardation, acute illness or contra-indication for pH monitoring.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: lifestyle counseling
The positions in the car safety seat and in supine 15 degrees anti-Trendelenburg are compared on the basis of a 20 hour pH monitoring. In one group the infants were first continuously positioned at 45 degrees elevation in a car safety seat (car safety seat type Maxi cosi Citi for infants from 0-13kg). During the next period the infants were kept in a supine 15 degrees anti-Trendelenburg position (hospital infant bed), and vice versa for the other group.
The positions in the car safety seat and in supine 15 degrees anti-Trendelenburg are compared on the basis of a 20 hour pH monitoring.In one group the infants were first continuously positioned at 45 degrees elevation in a car safety seat (car safety seat type Maxi cosi Citi for infants from 0-13kg). During the next period the infants were kept in a supine 15 degrees anti-Trendelenburg position (hospital infant bed), and vice versa for the other group.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

December 24, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Position

Clinical Trials on car safety seat

3
Subscribe