Efficacy and Safety of Dual-plasmid Hepatitis B Virus DNA Vaccine in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

December 7, 2011 updated by: Fuqiang Yang

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Dual-plasmid HBV DNA Vaccine Mediated by in Vivo Electroporation in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Under Lamivudine Chemotherapy

In order to study the immunotherapeutic effects of electroporation (EP)-mediated dual-plasmids Hepatitis B Virus DNA vaccine, the investigators plan to conduct a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, approved by Chinese State Food and Drug Administration with written informed consent from each chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with baseline ALT more than 2 times the ULN, for whom antiviral treatment is indicated and who were under the simultaneous lamivudine (LAM) chemotherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) affects approximately more than 350 million people worldwide, leading to a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations ranging from an asymptomatic carrier state to self-limited acute infection or fulminant hepatitis to chronic hepatitis with progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and poses a serious public health problem in endemic counties like China. Current available therapeutic remedies such as interferons and nucleotide/nucleoside analogues are far from satisfactory, for their therapeutic efficacies are limited by the high economic cost with the less tolerable adverse effects or the lack of viral eradicative effect for its long term control of the virus in most of the patients. Viral persistence has been associated with a defect in the development of HBV-specific cellular immunity. Strategies to boost or to broaden the weak virus-specific T-cell response of patients with chronic hepatitis B have been proposed as a means of curing this persistent infection. HBV envelope- and nucleocapsid-based vaccines, new formulations for recombinant vaccines and DNA-based vaccines are currently being assessed in clinical trials, among which DNA vaccine represents a promising immunotherapeutic approach that can induce T-cell mediated antigen specific immunity, owing to its de novo intracellular antigenic protein expression and synthesis.

In clinical trials, although HBV DNA vaccination developed protective antibody responses and antigen-specific CD8 T cells in healthy hepatitis-naive human volunteers, the detectable HBV-specific IFN-γ secreting T cells and decreased serum HBV DNA levels only in some chronic HBV carriers vaccinated with HBV PreS2/S DNA vaccine were limited. One resolution for the main obstacles of the new technique development is to enhance the transfection efficiency of plasmids into host cells; the other is to improve the immunogenicity of DNA vaccine by driving the naïve T cell responses towards the Th1 profile. To tackle the first problem of low transfection rate of DNA vaccine, the investigators had applied the in vivo electroporation (EP) for potency enhancement of HBV DNA vaccine, which dramatically improved the host cell transfection of the plasmids and enabled the DNA vaccine the investigators prepared to elicit both humoral and cellular immune responses in the large body weight animals like rabbit and nonhuman primates. In order to achieve the second goal of immunogenicity improvement of HBV DNA vaccine for its therapeutic usage, the investigators had designed and constructed the Th1 type cytokines (interleukin-2 and interferon-γ) fusion protein expression gene plasmids (pFP), in attempt to direct Th1 bias in favor of cellular immunity augment when being used in combination with HBV DNA vaccine. Both tactics in the form of the dual-plasmids DNA vaccination mediated by EP have been investigated to be safe and efficient to improve the transfection and enhance the immunogenicity of DNA vaccine to the host in both animal models and in phase I,II trials of healthy volunteers and CHB patients.

In order to study the immunotherapeutic effects of EP-mediated dual-plasmids HBV DNA vaccine, the investigators plan to conduct a clinical trial, approved by Chinese State Food and Drug Administration (license number: 2006L03542) with written informed consent from each patient. The trial is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled one in CHB patients with baseline ALT more than 2 times the ULN, for whom antiviral treatment is indicated and who were under the simultaneous lamivudine (LAM) chemotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

240

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

  • China
    • Bejing
      • Beijing, Bejing, China, 10000
        • Recruiting
        • Guiqiang Wang
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Guiqiang Wang, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 18-65 years with either sex;

  2. HBV serology meet the following criteria:

    • HBsAg-positive lasting for at least 6 months at the time of screening;
    • HBeAg-positive at the time of screening;
    • Serum HBV DNA≥1.0×10E5 copies/ml at the time of screening
  3. 80U/L<ALT<400U/L;
  4. TBIL<40μmol/L;
  5. No YMDD mutation of the HBV drug resistance gene
  6. Subjects agree not to participate in any other clinical trial or take any other anti-HBV therapeutics during the study;
  7. Subjects understand and sign the ICF which approved by EC, and are able to comply with the study procedures and complete the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Was suspected with HCC by the following evidence:

    • B-Ultrasound or imaging which shows occupying lesions;
    • Continuingly elevating serum AFP level even if the B-Ultrasound is normal;
    • AFP >100ng/ml;
  2. With acute hepatic decompensation caused by liver disease aggravation or with clinical symptoms of decompensated liver disease at baseline;
  3. Serum Cr≥1.5mg/dl (≥130μmol/l) at the time of screening;
  4. Serum amylase > two-fold of the upper limit of the normal reference value;
  5. Hb (male<100g/ L, female<90g/L), WBC<3.5×10E9/L,PLT<60×10E9/L (except hypersplenism and cirrhosis);
  6. Co-infection with HCV (anti-HCV positive), HIV and anti-HAV IgM positive, anti-HDV IgM positive, anti-HEV IgM positive, anti-CMV IgM positive and autoimmune hepatitis (e.g. antinuclear antibody titer>1:160 ) or other active liver disease caused by known or unknown factors;
  7. Any other serious disease or active diseases other than hepatitis B that are considered by investigators to be potential factors that may interfere with the therapy, assessment or compliance with the protocol, including any uncontrolled diseases with clinical significance, e.g. kidney, heart, lung, blood vessel, neurogenic, digestive system and metabolic diseases (diabetes, hyperthyroidism, adrenal gland diseases), autoimmune dysfunctions, and tumors, etc;
  8. History of alcohol or drug abuse that is considered by investigators that could affect subject's compliance with the protocol or could influence the result of the analysis;
  9. Pregnant or breast-feeding female subjects, or those who plan to be pregnant during the course of the study or male subjects' companions who plan to be pregnant during the course of the study;
  10. Having used immunosuppressive agents, immunomodulators (thymosin), cytotoxic drugs within 6 months or transaminase-decreasing drugs within one month prior to the initiation of this study;
  11. Having used anti-HBV drugs (Lamivudine, interferon, adefovir, entecavir, or sebivo, etc.) within 6 months prior to the initiation of this study;
  12. Had or planning to have liver transplantation;
  13. Having received experimental drug treatment from any other study within 3 months prior to the screening;
  14. Allergic to nucleoside drugs or nucleoside analogues;
  15. Not agreeing to the study protocol or any other factors considered not eligible for this study by investigators.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: LAM+DNA vaccine
lamivudine (LAM) chemotherapy and DNA vaccine
Biological: HBV DNA vaccine
HBV DNA vaccine means that each volunteer received 4 injections of 4 mg DNA vaccine scheduled by a prime and 3 boosts at intervals of 4, 8, 12 weeks.
Placebo Comparator: LAM+Placebo

Each volunteer received 4 injections of 4 mg placebo scheduled by a prime and 3 boosts at intervals of 4, 8, 12 weeks.

lamivudine (LAM) chemotherapy and Placebo
Other: Placebo
Placebo means the arm in which each volunteer received 4 injections of 4 mg placebo scheduled by a prime and 3 boosts at intervals of 4, 8, 12 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HBV DNA suppression
Time Frame: Before and after DNA vaccine injection: weeks 0, 60.
Suppression of HBV DNA was defined as the >2 log10 decrease of viral load from baseline level.
Before and after DNA vaccine injection: weeks 0, 60.
Loss of HBeAg
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 48.
HBeAg serum titer was dropped to the detection limit by quantitative determination.
Weeks 0, 48.
Appearance of Anti-HBe
Time Frame: At weeks 0,48.
At weeks 0,48.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HBeAg seroconversion rate
Time Frame: At weeks 0, 12, 24, 48, 72.
loss of HBeAg, or presence of anti-HBe antibody
At weeks 0, 12, 24, 48, 72.
The occurrence of YMDD mutants
Time Frame: At weeks 0, 48, 72.
Tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartae (YMDD) mutants were evaluated by means of polymerase chain reaction-restricted fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and PCR-Sequencing (Invitrogen Ltd. Shanghai,China), at baseline, week 48 and 72. The amino acid (AA) mutations were identified by comparing HBV RT sequences with the genotype-matched consensus sequence generated based on the HBV sequences obtained from genbank. A mutation type was referred to the replacement of the consensus AA of the corresponding genotype with a novel one.
At weeks 0, 48, 72.
Viral breakthrough rate
Time Frame: At weeks 0, 12, 24, 40, 48, 56, 60, 64, 72.
On the basis of present Guideline for Management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), the virologic breakthrough (VBT) was defined as >1 log copies increase in HBV DNA from nadir after an initial virologic response or HBV DNA could be detected again after the previous report of "under the detection limit".
At weeks 0, 12, 24, 40, 48, 56, 60, 64, 72.
HBV Ag specific T cell immunity
Time Frame: At weeks 0, 12, 24, 36, 52, 72.

The enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay was performed according to the manufacture's protocol in the human IFN-g ELISPOT Set (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). The ELISPOT assay for enumeration of antigen-specific IFN-γ-secreting cells (spot forming cells, SFCs) was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions . The number of IFN-γ spots was counted by AID Elispot reader system (AID, Germany). Data are expressed as the mean SFCs/106 PBMC.

Detection of HBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) was performed by using flow cytometry (FACS) Calibur (BD Biosciences).
At weeks 0, 12, 24, 36, 52, 72.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Fuqiang Yang

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2011

Last Verified

September 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2011005SW0101

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Hepatitis B

Clinical Trials on HBV DNA vaccine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in New Zealand

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe