Phase II Trial to Validate Markers for a Response Evaluation of a Combined Therapy in Patients With HER2+ Breast Cancer

September 16, 2019 updated by: West German Study Group

A Multicenter Site, Open Label, Phase II Trial to Validate Predictive Markers for the Response Evaluation of a Combined Chemo-immunotherapy in Patients With HER2-positive Early Breast Cancer

The Neo-PREDICT-HER2 Study is phase II trial to validate predictive markers for the response evaluation of a combined chemo-immunotherapy in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. The only treatment arm consists of Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks with lapatinib 750 mg P.O. daily and trastuzumab 2 mg/kg IV (loading dose 4 mg/kg) weekly for 12 weeks.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Trastuzumab (T)-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been reported to increase the probability of pathological complete response (pCR) in HER2 positive disease up to 67 %. Large trials revealed pCR rates (no remaining invasive and in situ components) of about 30-40 %, if anthracyclines/taxane based polychemotherapy was applied or about 40-45 % if no invasive tumor in the breast and lymph nodes was used as a pCR definition.

Nevertheless, resistance to trastuzumab remains one of the most important challenges in adjuvant and metastatic breast cancer therapy causing poor prognosis with an increased incidence of cerebral metastasis and limited therapeutic options after disease progression6. An improvement shows the combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib, which has been reported to have increased efficacy in in-vitro and in metastatic setting in patients who were mostly resistant to both therapies in the previous course of disease. Recent data from the neoadjuvant setting (neoALTTO) - on a paclitaxel backbone - showed a significantly higher pCR rate after L + T than with either compound separately (47 % vs. 20 % and 27.6 % respectively). Several trials are planned to evaluate the combination of both therapies in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting.

Clinical response measured by sequential evaluation of different proliferation markers (such as Ki-67) following a course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been demonstrated to correlate significantly with an increased risk of relapse in patients not achieving pathological complete response. It is therefore clinically relevant to evaluate such proliferation tools for early prediction of combination therapy efficacy (chemotherapy and HER2 targeted therapy). So far, it remains unclear which method of proliferation measurement is the optimal marker for response evaluation regarding a combined chemo-immunotherapy. However, measurement of proliferation and apoptosis genes as well as assessment of changes in Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3K), Protein Kinase B (AKT), Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF) and stem cell signalling after a short course of therapy could provide a unique signature for a dynamic response evaluation.

The planned trial will validate predictive markers and a dynamic model based on the sequential evaluation of different proliferation and apoptosis markers. Furthermore it will assess the pCR-rate after 12 weeks of therapy. The aim of the study is to define a predictive marker for the response evaluation of a combined chemo-immunotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 10713
        • Praxis für gynäkologische Onkologie am Brustzentrum City
    • Baden-Württemberg
      • Esslingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 73730
        • Klinikum Esslingen
      • Heilbronn, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 74078
        • SLK Kliniken
    • Hessen
      • Frankfurt (Main), Hessen, Germany, 65929
        • Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst
    • Niedersachsen
      • Georgsmarienhütte, Niedersachsen, Germany, 49124
        • Niels-Stensen-Kliniken
    • Nordrhein-Westfalen
      • Dortmund, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 44309
        • Klinikum Westfalen GmbH - Knappschaftskrankenhaus
      • Duisburg, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 47053
        • Bethesda Krankenhaus, Senologie
      • Hamm, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 59073
        • St. Barbara-KIinik
      • Köln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 51067
        • Krankenhaus Köln Holweide, Brustzentrum
    • Sachsen
      • Chemnitz, Sachsen, Germany, 09116
        • Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female patients, age at diagnosis 18 - 75 years
  2. Histological confirmed unilateral primary invasive carcinoma of the breast
  3. Clinical Stage Tumor 1 (cT1) (> 1 cm) - Clinical Stage Tumor 4 (cT4) (if operable, inflammatory breast cancer is excluded)
  4. HER2 over-expressing tumor confirmed by: 3+ by Immuno-histochemistry (IHC) and/or HER2/neu gene amplification by fluorescence, chromogenic or silver in-situ hybridization [Fluorescent In-Situ Hybridization (FISH), Chromogenic In-Situ Hybridization (CISH) or Silver In-Situ Hybridization (SISH); > 6 HER2 gene copies per nucleus or a FISH, CISH or SISH test ratio (HER2 gene copies to chromosome 17 signals) of ≥ 2.0]
  5. Clinically node positive disease or node negative disease
  6. No clinical evidence for distant metastasis (cM0) after conventional staging
  7. Performance Status Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≤ 1 or Karnofsky Index (KI) ≥ 80%
  8. Baseline Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) > 50% measured by echocardiography
  9. Negative pregnancy test (urine or serum) within 7 days prior to start of induction treatment in premenopausal patients
  10. The patient must be accessible for treatment and follow-up
  11. Written informed consent including a written informed consent for shipping of tumor block for central pathology review and evaluation prior to the start of any study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known hypersensitivity reaction to the compounds or incorporated substances
  2. Known polyneuropathy grade ≥ 2
  3. Have acute or currently active or requiring anti-viral therapy hepatic or biliary disease (with exception of patients with Gilbert's syndrome, asymptomatic gallstones, stable chronic liver disease per investigator assessment).
  4. Prior malignancy with a disease-free survival of < 10 years, except curatively treated basalioma of the skin, pTis of the cervix uteri
  5. Prior or concurrent treatment with cytotoxic agents for any reason after consultation with the sponsor
  6. Concurrent treatment with other experimental drugs. Participation in another clinical trial with any investigational not marketed drug within 30 days prior to study entry
  7. Male breast cancer
  8. Concurrent pregnancy; patients of childbearing potential must implement a highly effective (less than 1% failure rate) non-hormonal contraceptive measures during the study treatment
  9. Breast feeding women
  10. Sequential breast cancer
  11. Lack of patient compliance
  12. Inadequate organ function including:

    • Leucocytes < 3.5 x 109/l
    • Platelets < 100 x 109/l
    • Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 1.5 x 109/l
    • Hemoglobin < 9 g/dl
    • Serum Creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl
    • Serum Bilirubin > 1.1 mg/dl
    • Alkaline phosphatase > 2.5 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
    • Aspartate Transaminase (ASAT) and/or Alanine Transaminase (ALAT) > 2.5 ULN
    • Albumin < 2.5 g/dl
  13. Uncompensated cardiac function
  14. Malabsorption syndrome, disease significantly affecting gastrointestinal function
  15. Concomitant use of Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors or inducers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Paclitaxel + Lapatinib + Trastuzumab
Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks with lapatinib 750 mg P.O. daily and trastuzumab 2 mg/kg IV (loading dose 4 mg/kg) weekly for 12 weeks, biopsy before and after three weeks of study treatment
Core biopsies for histological analyses, to be analysed by the central pathology

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pathological Complete Response (pCR)
Time Frame: Average of 16 weeks
pCR was defined at the time of surgery and measured by size of residual tumor, proportion of vital cells within invasive carcinoma, number of positive lymph nodes (ypN) and size of the largest lymph node metastasis and ductal carcinoma in situ (ypT). pCR is defined as ypT0/is, ypN0. Further exploratory pCR definitions were ypT0, ypN0 (total pCR) and ypT0/is (near pCR).
Average of 16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Event Free Survival (EFS)
Time Frame: 5-year survival
5-year survival
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: 5-year survival
5-year survival

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proliferation and Apoptosis Genes
Time Frame: One week before and after three weeks of treatment
Proliferation Ki-67, Aurora A Kinase (STK15), survivin, Myb-related protein B (MYBL2),Cyclin B1 and apoptosis genes Bcl2, Epidermal Growth Factor-like 2 (SCUBE2), cleaved caspase C3 will be assessed in the samples from diagnostic and sequential biopsy.
One week before and after three weeks of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mathias Warm, MD, Krankenhaus Köln Holweide

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 16, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 16, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 3, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast

Clinical Trials on paclitaxel

3
Subscribe