Diagnostic Utility of Copeptin in Addition to High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin for the Early Diagnosis of NSTE-ACS (COPACS)

October 10, 2013 updated by: Fabrizio Ricci, MD, G. d'Annunzio University

Diagnostic Utility of Copeptin in Addition to High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin for the Early Diagnosis of Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes - The COPACS Study

Rapid and reliable exclusion of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during an emergency department (ED) triage is a major unmet clinical need. We aimed at verifying the non-inferiority of a single-sampling strategy of hs-cTn and copeptin compared with the dual hs-cTn sampling for the early diagnosis of Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes (NSTE-ACS) versus Non Coronary Chest Pain (NCCP) in a selected cohort of consecutive patients admitted at the Emergency Department.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

The evaluation of chest pain patients in the emergency department remains a costly and difficult challenge, because a large proportion of them do not suffer from an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The adequate ruling out of ACS in patients with chest pain is crucial, as the erroneous discharge of a patient with ACS is associated with a high risk of cardiac events. Rapid assessment of these patients is critical to direct further diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Electrocardiography (ECG) and cardiac troponin (cTn) are the current diagnostic cornerstones and complement clinical assessment in current AMI guidelines1. They allow to rule in an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) within the first 3 hours after presentation in the majority of patients and offer the opportunity to initiate appropriate, evidence-based treatment. The vast majority of patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with suspected AMI, however, finally prove not to have AMI. The current process of ruling out AMI is time-consuming and expensive. One fourth to one-third of patients with AMI present without significant ECG changes indicative of acute ischemia; therefore, the ECG is of little help to rule out AMI, especially in the setting of non-ST elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). High-sensitivity (hs)-cTn assays have been developed recently, enabling measurements of concentrations that are ∼10-fold lower than those previously measurable. Recent studies have confirmed the increased accuracy of these high-sensitivity assays compared with conventional assays in the early detection of AMI and in the safely ruling in or out of coronary causes of chest pain. However, concerns have been raised about a possible specificity deficit with these new assays. In addition, a second measurement of hs-cTn may be warranted in order to increase the accuracy of the assay.

Copeptin, the C-terminal part of the vasopressin pro-hormone, and a marker of acute endogenous stress, has been demonstrated to be useful for a more rapid ruling out of acute myocardial infarction. Current evidence for the diagnostic validity and performance of a combination of high sensitivity-cardiac troponin and copeptin is limited and controversial. A Bayesian probabilistic approach is likely to be the correct way to evaluate the possible incremental value of copeptin in the detection of ACS. Thus, we aim at prospectively evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of copeptin, hs-cTn, CK-MB and myoglobin, alone or in combination with hs-cTn, for the early diagnosis and ruling out of Non-ST-Elevation (NSTE) ACS versus non-cardiac causes of chest pain in a selected cohort of Emergency Department (ED) chest pain patients according to their pre-test probability, as assessed through a combination of two validated clinical risk score systems (i.e. Chest Pain Score and TIMI Risk Score).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

180

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Fabrizio Ricci
  • Phone Number: +393661088684

Study Locations

      • Chieti, Italy, 66100
        • Recruiting
        • Ospedale Clinicizzato SS. Annunziata

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients admitted to the Emergency Department.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chest pain duration > 5 minutes at rest or upon minimal exertion
  • Chest pain onset < 6 hours
  • Non-traumatic chest pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac arrest
  • STEMI
  • New left bundle branch block

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Non-inferiority of a single-sampling strategy of hs-cTn and copeptin compared with the dual hs-cTn sampling for the early diagnosis of NSTE-ACS in a selected cohort of consecutive patients admitted at the Emergency Department.
Time Frame: On admission to the Emergency Department
We aimed at verifying the hypothesis that diagnostic efficiency of the combination of copeptin and hs-cTn on admission would be non-inferior with respect to the 3 hours interval hs-cTn serial sampling for the early diagnosis or ruling out of NSTE-ACS versus non cardiac chest pain in a selected cohort of consecutive ED chest pain patients. According to current international guidelines we selected a 20% difference between serial hscTn levels to establish the diagnosis of myocardial infarction, since the change represented twice the recommended maximum imprecision (a coefficient of variation of 10%).
On admission to the Emergency Department

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fabrizio Ricci, Institute of Cardiology and Center of Excellence on Aging, "G. D'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 14, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 14, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2013

Last Verified

October 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chest Pain

3
Subscribe