Abatacept vs Placebo in RA Patients With Hepatitis B on Entecavir Background (RA)

November 12, 2020 updated by: University of California, Los Angeles

Pilot Study to Evaluate Subcutaneous Abatacept vs Placebo in RA Patients With Hepatitis B on Entecavir Background- a Pilot, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the combination of abatacept along with entecavir (the study drugs) is safe and effective in treating symptoms related to rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Abatacept, given in an intravenous (IV - injected into a vein) as well as subcutaneous form, is approved by the FDA for the treatment of RA. In this research, abatacept will be given by injection. A subcutaneous injection is an injection given under the skin.

Entecavir, to be taken by mouth, is approved by the FDA for the treatment of hepatitis B.

The study is divided into the following time periods:

Screening Phase: Up to 4 weeks Randomized Double-blind Phase: 24 weeks Open-label Extension Phase: 24 weeksFollow-up Phase: a phone call after Week 48

Each phase contains one or more study visits.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disorder affecting 1% of the world's population. If not adequately controlled, it may lead to disability in up to 30% of patients within the first three years of disease onset [1] and can be associated with premature death. Recent research has suggested that the first event in the pathogenesis of RA is an antigen dependent activation of T-cells in an immunogenetically susceptible host. T-cells require two signals for activation, one involving the trimolecular complex (class II Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC), antigen, T-cell receptor), and the other being co-stimulation of the CD28 (Cluster of Differentiation 28) molecule on T-cells by the B7 molecules (CD80 and CD86) on antigen presenting cells.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) can cause chronic disease in 5% of immunocompetent adults and has a prevalence of over 350 million worldwide. It is a leading cause of chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer and accounts for one million deaths annually. In patients with chronic hepatitis B and RA, treatment options are limited. Traditional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are associated with hepatotoxicity and are contraindicated in chronic hepatitis. A recent retrospective analysis suggests that successful use of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) agents may be possible in these patients but the authors do warn that these patients should be closely monitored and that fatal reactivation of hepatitis B is possible. Treatment with rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody against B-cell protein CD20, is another option; however, the use of this medication in RA patients with chronic hepatitis B may also cause reactivation.

When RA patients with chronic hepatitis B were started on a Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inhibitor or methotrexate (MTX), 2 of 5 HBsAg+ patients reactivated their hepatitis B, indicating a possible high rate of activation in these patients when not on hepatitis B treatment. Reactivation in this and another study occurred after 9-19 months of antirheumatic therapy. In RA patients with chronic Hepatitis B, entecavir appears to be effective at preventing reactivation.

There are no studies on the safety of abatacept in patients with RA and HBV. Adequate T-cell function is important to help cure or contain HBV infection. Our site has conducted a retrospective study that shows preliminary safety of abatacept in patients with RA and chronic Hepatitis B on antiviral therapy. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of abatacept in RA patients with chronic Hepatitis B in a pilot study in a randomized, controlled fashion.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • Division of Rheumatology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of RA.
  2. Baseline CDAI >10 with TJC (Tender Joint Count) > 4 and SJC (Swollen Joint Count) > 2.
  3. Chronic Hepatitis B as defined by a history of patients with a HBsAg positive for at least 6 months with undetectable HBV DNA; or a history of patients with negative HBsAg and positive HBcAb or HBsAb, with undetectable HBV DNA.
  4. No evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based upon alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≤20 ng/mL at screening,) negative liver imaging as shown by ultrasound, computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging within 24 weeks of screening. Participants with AFP >20 ng/mL must be evaluated clinically with additional imaging and shown not to have HCC on CT or MRI before they can be enrolled.
  5. Oral corticosteroids (≤ 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent) and NSAIDs (Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs) are permitted if the patient is on a stable dose regimen for ≥ 2 weeks prior to and including at baseline.
  6. Men and women, >= 18 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding. Sexually active fertile men not using effective birth control if their partners are WOCBP (Women of Child Bearing Potential).
  2. Target Disease Exceptions

    a) Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA; fibromyalgia or keratoconjunctivitis/xerostomia are allowed, as long as these will not confound the CLINICAL EFFICACY OUTCOMES.

  3. Medical History and Concurrent Diseases

    1. Subjects who are impaired, incapacitated, or incapable of completing study-related assessments.
    2. Subjects who underwent previous MCP (metacarpophalangeal) arthroplasty, have such a procedure scheduled, or anticipate the need for such a procedure during the study.
    3. Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening
    4. Subjects with active vasculitis of a major organ system, with the exception of rheumatoid nodules or minor rheumatoid vasculitis lesions of the skin
    5. Subjects with current uncontrolled symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic hematologic, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, cardiac, neurologic, or cerebral disease, including Cirrhosis with Child-Pugh Class >=2 or COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) with FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) /FVC (forced vital capacity) < 0.6
    6. Female subjects who have had a recent breast cancer screening that is suspicious for malignancy and where the diagnosis is not excluded.

    h) Subjects who currently abuse drugs or alcohol. i) Subjects with evidence of active or latent bacterial or viral infections at the time of potential enrollment, including HIV.

    j) Subjects with herpes zoster or cytomegalovirus (CMV) that resolved less than 2 months before the informed consent document was signed.

    k) Subjects who have received any live vaccines within 3 months of the anticipated first dose of study medication.

    l) Subjects with any serious bacterial infection within the last 3 months, unless treated and resolved with antibiotics, or any chronic bacterial infection.

    m) Subjects at risk for tuberculosis (TB) or not treated for latent TB is tested positive.

    n) Subjects who are positive for hepatitis C antibody if the presence of hepatitis C virus was also shown with polymerase chain reaction or recombinant immunoblot assay.

    o) Subjects who have abnormal laboratory values

  4. Prohibited Treatments and/or Therapies

    1. Subjects who have at any time received treatment with any investigational drug within 28 days (or less than 5 terminal half-lives of elimination) of the Day 1 dose.
    2. Any concomitant biologic DMARD, such as anakinra.
    3. Previous treatment with cell-depleting therapies, including investigational agents, including but not limited to CAMPATH, anti-CD4 (cluster of differentiation 4), anti-CD5, anti-CD3, and anti-CD19.
    4. Anti-CD20 treatment within the last 6 months (OK to include if they were dosed > 6 months ago).
    5. Treatment with methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, cyclosporine A, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, within <= 4 weeks prior to baseline.
    6. Treatment with etanercept within 2 weeks, infliximab/certolizumab/golimumab/adalimumab with <=8 weeks, anakinra within <=1 week prior to baseline.
    7. Previous abatacept use.
    8. Treatment with sulfasalazine within < 4 weeks prior to baseline

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Abatacept Arm
This arm of study subjects will receive 125 mg subcutaneous abatacept during the 24 week double blind period.
Abatacept Injection, 125 mg/Syringe (125 mg/mL), is a sterile solution for SC administration, which contains approximately 126 mg abatacept.
Other Names:
  • Orencia
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Arm
This arm of study patients will receive matching placebo injections during the 24 week double blind period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Every 4 weeks from Week 4 to Week 48
Adverse events will be assessed at timepoints specified in the protocol.
Every 4 weeks from Week 4 to Week 48
Number of Subjects with Hepatitis B Reactivation
Time Frame: Every 4 Weeks from Week 4 to Week 48
Blood test for Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA will be used.
Every 4 Weeks from Week 4 to Week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
DAS28-ESR-4 Unit
Time Frame: Screening, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48
Screening, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48
CDAI Unit
Time Frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
TJC Count
Time Frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
SJC Count
Time Frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Patient Global (Visual Analogue Scale)
Time Frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
MD Global (Visual Analogue Scale)
Time Frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Pain (measured on a 5 point Likert scale)
Time Frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Global Assessment of Disease Activity (as measured on a 5 point Likert scale)
Time Frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
HAQ-DI Units
Time Frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Fatigue (as assessed by FACIT-Fatigue Unit)
Time Frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Sleep as assessed by Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Instrument Unit
Time Frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
ACR 20/50/70 Percentage
Time Frame: Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48
Screening, Weeks 4,8,12,24,36,48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Suzanne Kafaja, M.D., University of California, Los Angeles

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 12, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 12, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 4, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe