- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02539563
Do Peanut Shaped Birthing Balls Reduce the Length of Labor in Patients With Epidural Analgesia?
March 9, 2022 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Labor patients who meet inclusion and exclusion criteria will be consented to be participate in this study to determine if the use of a peanut shaped birthing ball reduces the length of labor and reduces the incidence of cesarean section.
Subjects will be randomized at the time of consent to either use the birthing ball or not use the birthing ball from the time of labor analgesia until complete cervical dilation.
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
101
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
- Novant Health-Forsyth Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 50 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- nulliparous
- >/= 18 years of age
- not allergic to medications used for labor analgesia
- no contraindications to labor analgesia
- ASA I-II
- EGA >/= 37 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- under age 18
- Spanish speaking only
- multiparous
- EGA <37 weeks
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: peanut ball
the peanut shaped birthing ball after labor analgesia will be utilized
|
peanut ball will be utilized
|
No Intervention: no peanut ball
the peanut shaped birthing ball will not be utilized during labor
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Length of Labor
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
|
time in minutes will be calculated from epidural catheter insertion until delivery
|
up to 24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Maternal Satisfaction
Time Frame: length of labor, up to 24 hours
|
11-point scale of 0=not satisfied up to 10=most satisfied of all
|
length of labor, up to 24 hours
|
Participant Cesarean Delivery Incidence-Mode of Deliveries
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
|
the number of subjects who had to had a cesarean delivery
|
up to 24 hours
|
Number of Participants With Post-delivery Complications
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
|
Number of participants that had post-delivery complications was reported
|
up to 24 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Robert D'Angelo, MD, WakeForest School of Medicine
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Tussey CM, Botsios E, Gerkin RD, Kelly LA, Gamez J, Mensik J. Reducing Length of Labor and Cesarean Surgery Rate Using a Peanut Ball for Women Laboring With an Epidural. J Perinat Educ. 2015;24(1):16-24. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.24.1.16.
- Bucklin BA, Hawkins JL, Anderson JR, Ullrich FA. Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey: twenty-year update. Anesthesiology. 2005 Sep;103(3):645-53. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200509000-00030. No abstract available.
- Halpern SH, Leighton BL, Ohlsson A, Barrett JF, Rice A. Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1998 Dec 23-30;280(24):2105-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.24.2105.
- Martin JA, et al. Births: Final Report 2013. National Vital Statistics Report, 2015; Vol 64: Number 1. Also accessed at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/delivery.htm.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;210(3):179-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026.
- Tsen LC, Thue B, Datta S, Segal S. Is combined spinal-epidural analgesia associated with more rapid cervical dilation in nulliparous patients when compared with conventional epidural analgesia? Anesthesiology. 1999 Oct;91(4):920-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199910000-00010.
- BISHOP EH. PELVIC SCORING FOR ELECTIVE INDUCTION. Obstet Gynecol. 1964 Aug;24:266-8. No abstract available.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 4, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 26, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
December 26, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 25, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 31, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
September 3, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 18, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 9, 2022
Last Verified
July 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00033103
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Labor
-
University Hospital, GenevaQIAGEN Gaithersburg, Inc; Hologic, Inc.; Pregnolia ACCompletedLabor Onset | Labor, Induced | Labor, Obstetric | Predictive ModelSwitzerland
-
MemorialCare Health SystemCompletedLength of Labor | Second Stage of Labor | Intravenous Hydration of LaborUnited States
-
University of RochesterJuniper Pharmaceuticals, Inc.WithdrawnLabor, PrematureUnited States
-
Raed SalimCompleted
-
CAMC Health SystemCompleted
-
HaEmek Medical Center, IsraelCompleted
-
Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaCompletedThreatened Premature LaborSpain
-
University of TennesseeRecruitingLabor Onset and Length Abnormalities | Labor Long | Prolonged Labor | Labor; PoorUnited States
-
Oslo University HospitalCompletedLabor (Obstetrics)--Complications | Labor; Prolonged, First StageNorway
-
Hospital Miguel ServetCompletedPregnancy | Obstetric Labor | Cervical Ripening | Induced Labor
Clinical Trials on peanut shaped birthing ball
-
Near East University, TurkeyCompleted
-
Gaziantep Islam Science and Technology UniversityCompletedSatisfaction, Patient | Labor Pain | Labor FastTurkey
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityCompletedCesarean SectionUnited States
-
Geisinger ClinicTerminatedObesity | Cesarean SectionUnited States
-
Istanbul Medipol University HospitalCompleted
-
Taipei Medical UniversityTaipei Medical University HospitalCompleted
-
Gulhane Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Taichung Veterans General HospitalCompletedLabor | Epidural AnesthesiaTaiwan
-
University of TennesseeRecruitingLabor Onset and Length Abnormalities | Labor Long | Prolonged Labor | Labor; PoorUnited States