Myeloid-Derived Supressor Cells in Cardiac Surgery Patients (MyDeCCS)

Myeloid-Derived Supressor Cells in Uncomplicated vs Complicated Patients After Cardiac Surgery

Pro- and anti-inflammatory response during the formation of the critical state develops at the same time. Because of its balanced or unbalanced systemic inflammation can be either aborted or able to lead to multiple organ failure. With regard to sepsis, systemic inflammatory response characteristics are well understood, is not achieved in respect of the "sterile" inflammation.

Extracorporeal circulation is a clinical model of systemic inflammatory response due to non-physiological activation of tissue factor in the extracorporeal perfusion, the use of non-pulsatile circulation mode, intentional / unintentional hypothermia, bacterial translocation from the gastrointestinal tract and perfusion deficit.

We have proved that the monocytes demonstrate suppressor function, which can be a predictor of complications from cardiac surgery patients.

The most important component of the formation of multiple organ failure (MOF) in critically ill patients is immunosuppression.

During the study of experimental and clinical tumor growth process scientists has provided a new population of immature myeloid cells (myeloid suppressor cells or suppressor cells of myeloid origin, MDSC). Most of the works have been devoted to the role of MDSC in the development of tumors, where it has been clearly shown that this cell population has an undoubted effect of immune suppression. However, recent studies show that the role of MDSC is not limited to cancer process, but extends to chronic or acute inflammation.

The aim of this study is to determine the role of MDSC in the development of immune suppression and complications after heart surgery carried out under cardiopulmonary bypass.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The use of MEC systems can be useful to prevent the MDSC activation after cardiac surgery.

The procedures to modulate the cytokines concentration can be useful to prevent the MDSC activation after cardiac surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. the patients with ischemia heart disease and/or valvular heart disease,
  2. signed inform consent,
  3. CABG and/or valve replacement/plastic procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

1) congenital heart disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Uncomplicated cardiac surgery patients
Patients after scheduled cardiac surgery procedures
Active Comparator: Complicated cardiac surgery patients
MECC systems Cytokines modulation by CytoSorb and PMMA membranes
We should use the modification of extracorporeal circulation to reduce the systemic inflammatory response due to excessive haemodilution, allogenic blood transfusion.
We should use the modification of cytokines by CytoSorb devices and cytokines removal by PMMA membranes during extracorporeal circulation in patients with risk factors of complications (long duration of extracorporeal circulation, re-do procedures and other)
Other Names:
  • CytoSorb devices,

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
MOF-free days
Time Frame: 28 day
28 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: 28 day
28 day
the incidents of infection complications
Time Frame: 28 day
28 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 19, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 19, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

Clinical Trials on minimal extracorporeal circulation (MEC)

3
Subscribe