Use of Cooled Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Hip Pain Associated With OA of the Hip Compared to Intra-articular Steroid Injections

August 23, 2018 updated by: Rothman Institute Orthopaedics
This will be a single-center, prospective, single-blinded randomized clinical trial to investigate the effectiveness of using cooled RFA for the treatment of OA hip pain and function in subjects treated with cooled RFA compared with standard of care intra-articular steroid injections

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

86

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects presenting with radiographic evidence of hip OA and demonstrating hip pain for at least 30 days will be targeted. Radiographic evidence of hip OA is defined as Kellegran-Lawrence grade 2-4
  • Not an operative candidate as per RI joint replacement surgeon OR
  • Subjects who do not desire joint replacement surgery after consultation with RI joint replacement surgeon
  • Male or non-pregnant female older than 18 years of age
  • willing and able to sign the IRB-approved informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any steroid injection in hip within 90 days
  • Local infection at injection site or active systemic infection
  • Anticoagulation status with inability to discontinue medication for appropriate duration for nerve blocks and RFA given proximity to major artery. (No anticoagulation contraindications for joint injection)
  • AICD with inability to utilize magnet for RFA per treating cardiologist
  • Body habitus does not allow for placement of longest needles and electrodes (approximately 15cm) to successfully administer treatment
  • Allergy or severe renal impairment precluding iodionated contrast or magnavist injection despite standard premedication protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cooled RFA treatment
cooled radiofrequency ablation
Active Comparator: Steroid injection
steroid injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain
Time Frame: 24 weeks following treatment
Visual Analog Scale
24 weeks following treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018Stolzenberg

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteo Arthritis of Hip

Clinical Trials on Cooled RFA treatment

3
Subscribe