Eus-guided Cryothermal Ablation in Stage III Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

March 17, 2021 updated by: Michele Tedeschi, Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Use of the Eus-guided Cryothermal Ablation in the Multimodality Approach to Patients With Stage III (Locally Advanced and Borderline Resectable) Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic cancer represents the 11th most commonly diagnosed cancer in men and 9th in women, being the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the Western countries. Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis and median overall survival is less than 5 months in population-based studies. Approximately 80% of patients with pancreatic cancer present with unresectable disease, which is either due to locally advanced or metastatic disease. About 40% of patients have metastases at the time of diagnosis and in another 30 to 40 % of the patients tumour resection is not feasible because of vascular invasion, or poor general conditions. In resectable patients surgical resection with negative margins (R0) continues to be worldwide considered the only chance to cure, however, this standard treatment is usually reserved to a small number of patients. In patients with locally advanced tumour, neoadjuvant treatment has been proposed in various modalities as a way to decrease size and downstage the tumour leading to a resectable disease. Several phase I - II studies have shown the capability of chemotherapy alone or chemo radiotherapy based regimens to increase the resection rates of these patients and the related median overall survival.

Systemic chemotherapy followed by chemoRT or stereotattic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an option for selected patients with unresectable disease and good PS who have not developed metastatic disease.

This sequence is especially recommended in cases in which it is highly unlikely that the patient will become resectable (ie, complete encasement of SMA/superior celiac artery). Due to the significant rate of toxicity of the radio therapy (RT) treatment alone or in adjunct to chemotherapy, other local treatments with the goal to downstage the primary tumour with less or no toxicity as compared to RT have been proposed.

Radiofrequency (RF) has been used with success in solid cancers like the hepatocellular carcinoma while cryoablation has been used for breast and renal cancers. RFA has been applied in few clinical trials in human pancreatic cancer either without any imaging guidance or just under intra-operatory ultrasound control during palliative open surgery.

The HybridTherm probe (HTP), (ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) combines bipolar RF-ablation with cryogenic induced cooling. A bipolar radiofrequency system creates ablation with less collateral thermal damage than standard monopolar systems but with the trade-off to lose overall efficiency.

In a recent in-vivo study the feasibility of the HTP in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma has been shown. HTP has been applied under EUS-guidance to patients who have been already treated by chemotherapy (two lines) and in many cases with the adjunct of RT.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Milano
      • Rozzano, Milano, Italy, 20089
        • Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Only patients with pathologically proven, locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma will be selected.
  • The criteria for unresectability will be: encasement or thrombosis of one or more large vessels surrounding the pancreas (celiac axis, portal vein, and/or superior mesenteric artery and/or vein, and/or hepatic artery, except the splenic vessels); infiltration of the vessel wall or contact 180° for more than 2 cm length, with initial stricture of the vessel or alteration of the Doppler signal (each patient will undergo thoracic and abdominal-CT with contrast medium to check resectability and detect the absence of distant metastasis).

Esclusion criteria:

  • Patients with pancreatic tumors other than pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
  • Patients with resectable, borderline resectable or metastatic PDAC

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with feasible EUS-guided Cryothermal Ablation
Time Frame: The day of procedure
The procedure will be defined as "feasible" if the placement of the probe inside the tumor will be successful and "not feasible" if it will not be possible to place the probe inside the lesion because of difficulties such as hardness of the tumor, stiffness of the GI wall, or interposition of vessels
The day of procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: 6 months after the procedure

To demonstrate the efficacy of the HybridTherm probe in the control of the tumour progression in terms of progression-free survival, measured at 6-month after therapy onset (PFS-6) by MRI. PFS-6 takes in consideration the tumour growth in relation to the volume/size evaluated as a difference between the previous and the current examination.

In practice, it is the time interval between the enrolment of the patient and the first radiological evidence of tumor progression.

6 months after the procedure
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events
Time Frame: 30 days after the procedure
Complications will be recorded and laboratory and radiologic follow-up will be performed to detect them.
30 days after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Cancer

Clinical Trials on HTP treatment

3
Subscribe