Is Intralymphatic Allergen Immunotherapy Effective and Safe?

December 20, 2019 updated by: Lars Olaf Cardell

Is Intralymphatic Allergen Immunotherapy Effective and Safe: a Human Randomized Clinical Trial- Substudy Borås With a Randomized Preseasonal Booster

15 patients with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis against grass were recruited and enrolled in the study. They received three open label intralympatic grass allergen injections with the dose 1000 SQ-U each and with one month interval. The next year the patients were randomized double blind to an active or placebo booster injection of 1000 SQ-U before the pollen season. Grass specific IgG4 levels were measured before and at various time ponts after treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether intralymphatic administration of AIT is a safe and effective treatment for patients with pollen-induced allergic rhinitis. The long term goal is to provide a base for a more efficient administration of ASIT, which will reduce both the dose necessary and the number of clinic visits associated with the conventional subcutaneous ASIT.

The aim of the present substudy is to evaluate if a randomized preseasonal ILIT booster, after three open label ILIT injections, can increase the allergen specific IgG4 antibodies, and if the IgG4 increase can be correlated to clinical effect characterized with seasonal questionnaires.

The first part of the study is completed and published (PMID: 23374268)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Borås, Sweden, 501 82
        • Allergy Unit, Södra Älvsborgs Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-50,
  • Seasonal allergic symptoms for birch and/or grass verified by skin prick test,
  • Accepted informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or nursing
  • Autoimmune or collagen disease (known)
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Perennial pulmonary disease
  • Hepatic disease
  • Renal disease
  • Cancer
  • Any medication with a possible side-effect of interfering with the immune response
  • Previous immuno- or chemotherapy
  • Chronic diseases
  • Other upper airway disease (non-allergic sinusitis, nasal polyps, chronic obstructive and restrictive lung disease)
  • Disease or conditions rendering the treatment of anaphylactic reactions difficult (symptomatic coronary heart diseases, severe arterial hypertension and treatment with β-blockers)
  • Major metabolic disease
  • Known or suspected allergy to the study product
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Mental incapability of coping with the study
  • Withdrawal of informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active booster
After three basic open label grass allergen ILIT injections the patient is randomized to an active ILIT booster 1 year after the first treatment.
0.1 mL of 10 000 SQ-U/mL (1000 SQ-U) as an intralymphatic injection
Other Names:
  • Grass allergen with aluminum adjuvant
Placebo Comparator: Placebo booster
After three basic open label grass allergen ILIT injections the patient is randomized to a placebo ILIT booster 1 year after the first treatment.
0.1 mL of ALK Diluent as an intralymphatic injection
Other Names:
  • Human albumin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the serum-level of timothy specific IgG4 after 1 month
Time Frame: Change between baseline and 1 month after treatment.
Blood samples with measurement of allergen specific blocking IgG4 antibodies
Change between baseline and 1 month after treatment.
Change in the serum-level of timothy specific IgG4 after 9 months
Time Frame: Change between baseline and 9 months after treatment.
Blood samples with measurement of allergen specific blocking IgG4 antibodies
Change between baseline and 9 months after treatment.
Change in the serum-level of timothy specific IgG4 2 months after booster
Time Frame: Change between baseline and 2 months after the booster treatment (14 months after the basic treatment).
Blood samples with measurement of allergen specific blocking IgG4 antibodies
Change between baseline and 2 months after the booster treatment (14 months after the basic treatment).
Change in the serum-level of timothy specific IgG4 10 months after booster
Time Frame: Change between baseline and 10 months after the booster treatment (22 months after the basic treatment).
Blood samples with measurement of allergen specific blocking IgG4 antibodies
Change between baseline and 10 months after the booster treatment (22 months after the basic treatment).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lars Olaf Cardell, Professor, Karolinska Institutet

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 25, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Allergic Rhinitis Due to Grass Pollen

Clinical Trials on ALK Alutard 5-grasses

3
Subscribe