Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Drug Utilization of Boceprevir and Clinical Management of Health Outcomes of Interest in Chronic Hepatitis C Participants (P08518)

28 de julio de 2016 actualizado por: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

An Observational Post-Authorization Safety Study (PASS) of Victrelis™ (Boceprevir) Among Chronic Hepatitis C Patients

This is an observational prospective follow-up study to assess the utilization of boceprevir and the management of pre-specified health outcomes of interest (HOIs) under conditions of routine clinical care in participants with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype 1.

As an observational prospective study, this study is not intended to change the participant/physician relationship, nor influence the physician's drug prescription or therapeutic management of the participant. No individual administration of any therapeutic or prophylactic agent is assigned in this protocol, and there are no procedures required as part of this protocol. Physician choice of the drug used to treat the participant is based on clinical judgment alone.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Actual)

713

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

Adults 18 years or older with CHC genotype 1

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype-1 infection
  • Untreated or failed previous therapy
  • Initiated a new treatment regimen after the study implementation date at their site
  • Agrees to participate in the study by giving written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Taking part in a clinical trial or in any study where a participant is receiving care outside of normal clinical practice for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Modelos observacionales: Grupo
  • Perspectivas temporales: Futuro

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Boceprevir + PR
CHC genotype-1 participants included in study and prescribed boceprevir plus PR as routine clinical management.
Telaprevir + PR
CHC genotype-1 participants included in study and prescribed telaprevir plus PR as routine clinical management.
PR Alone
CHC genotype-1 participants included in study and prescribed PR alone as routine clinical management.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Percentage of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone (Drug Utilization Pattern)
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 37 months
The percentage of CHC participants initiating boceprevir plus PR treatment, telaprevir plus PR treatment, or PR treatment alone was determined from a Drug Utilization questionnaire that was administered to physicians using an electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) to collect site level information and reported with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 37 months
Baseline Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Weight
Periodo de tiempo: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline mean weight (standard deviation [SD]) in kilograms (Kg) was recorded from the eCRF.
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Height
Periodo de tiempo: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline mean height (SD) in centimeters (cm) was recorded from the eCRF.
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Body Mass Index (BMI)
Periodo de tiempo: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline mean body mass index (SD) in Kg/m^2 was recorded from the eCRF.
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline Disease Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Baseline Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype
Periodo de tiempo: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline HCV genotype was recorded from the eCRF and the number of participants who were 1a genotype, 1b genotype, or unknown/other was reported.
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline Disease Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Baseline Viral Load
Periodo de tiempo: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Participant baseline HCV viral load was recorded from the eCRF and categorized as either "Low" (<800,000 IU/mL or <2,000,000 RNA copies/mL) or "High" (≥800,000 IU/mL or ≥2,000,000 RNA copies/mL).
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Baseline Disease Characteristics of Participants Initiating Boceprevir Plus PR Treatment, Telaprevir Plus PR Treatment, or PR Treatment Alone: Baseline Grade for Child-Pugh Score
Periodo de tiempo: Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
The Child-Pugh Score is used to determine the prognosis of chronic liver disease, in particular cirrhosis. It is classified into Classes A (best prognosis) to C (worst prognosis). Child-Pugh scores assessed within 3 months before CHC treatment regimen initiation were recorded from the eCRF, and the number of participants who were Grade A, Grade B, Grade C, not assessed, or unknown whether assessed were reported.
Before initiation of CHC treatment (Week 0 baseline)
Percentage of Anemia Episodes Managed by at Least One Clinical Intervention
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dL) was considered a Health Outcome of Interest (HOI) for this study. Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of anemia in participants could include erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA), blood transfusion, drug dose reduction, other treatment, and CHC treatment regimen modifications (drug dose reduction, drug discontinuation, and drug interruption). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive). The percentage of anemia episodes that were managed by at least one intervention is reported for each CHC treatment exposure group with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Anemia Episodes Managed by Each Clinical Intervention Out of All Managed Anemia Episodes
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen

Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of anemia in participants could include erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA), blood transfusion (BT), other treatment (OT), and CHC treatment regimen modifications including drug dose reduction (DDR), drug discontinuation (DD), and drug interruption (DI). Interventions could be used in combination (e.g. ESA plus blood transfusion) and more than one treatment modification could have been performed. For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive).

For each CHC treatment exposure group, the percentage of anemia episodes managed by a particular intervention are reported out of the total number of managed anemia episodes with data available for that intervention (i.e. anemia episodes with missing data for an intervention were excluded).

Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Grade 3/4 Neutropenia Episodes Managed by at Least One Clinical Intervention
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Grade 3/4 neutropenia (Grade 3: neutrophil count 0.5 - <0.75 × 10^9/L, Grade 4: <0.5 × 10^9/L) was considered a HOI for this study. Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of grade 3/4 neutropenia in participants could include Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use and CHC treatment regimen modifications (drug dose reduction, drug discontinuation, and drug interruption). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive). The percentage of grade 3/4 neutropenia episodes that were managed by at least one intervention is reported for each CHC treatment exposure group with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Grade 3/4 Neutropenia Episodes Managed by Each Clinical Intervention Out of All Managed Episodes
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen

Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of grade 3/4 neutropenia in participants could include Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use, other treatment (OT), and CHC treatment regimen modifications including drug dose reduction (DDR), drug discontinuation (DD), and drug interruption (DI). More than one treatment modification could have been performed. For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive).

For each CHC treatment exposure group, the percentage of grade 3/4 neutropenia episodes managed by a particular intervention are reported out of the total number of managed grade 3/4 neutropenia episodes with data available for that intervention (i.e. grade 3/4 neutropenia episodes with missing data for an intervention were excluded).

Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Grade 3/4 Thrombocytopenia Episodes Managed by at Least One Clinical Intervention
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (Grade 3: platelet count 25 - <50 × 10^9/L, Grade 4: <25 × 10^9/L) was considered a HOI for this study. Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in participants could include thrombopoietin, platelet transfusion, other treatment, and CHC treatment regimen modifications (drug dose reduction, drug discontinuation, and drug interruption). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive). The percentage of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia episodes that were managed by at least one intervention is reported for each CHC treatment exposure group with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Grade 3/4 Thrombocytopenia Episodes Managed by Each Clinical Intervention Out of All Managed Episodes
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen

Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in participants could include thrombopoietin (TPO), platelet transfusion (PT), other treatment (OT) , and CHC treatment regimen modifications including drug dose reduction (DDR), drug discontinuation (DD), and drug interruption (DI). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive).

For each CHC treatment exposure group, the percentage of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia episodes managed by a particular intervention are reported out of the total number of managed grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia episodes with data available for that intervention (i.e. grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia episodes with missing data for an intervention were excluded).

Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Serious Rash Episodes Managed by at Least One Clinical Intervention
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Serious rash was considered a HOI for this study and included rash > 50% of body surface area, rash associated with significant systemic symptoms, or rash resulting in hospitalization or urgent care visit. Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of serious rash in participants could include topical corticosteroid use, intravenous (IV) and/or oral corticosteroids, emollients/moisturizers, antihistamines, other treatment, and CHC treatment regimen modifications (drug dose reduction, drug discontinuation, and drug interruption). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive). The percentage of serious rash episodes that were managed by at least one intervention is reported for each CHC treatment exposure group with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen
Percentage of Serious Rash Episodes Managed by Each Clinical Intervention Out of All Managed Episodes
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen

Clinical interventions used to manage episodes of serious rash in participants could include topical corticosteroid (TC), intravenous (IV) and/or oral (PO) corticosteroids (IV/PO CS), emollients/moisturizers (E/M), antihistamines (AH), other treatment (OT), and CHC treatment regimen modifications including drug dose reduction (DDR), drug discontinuation (DD), and drug interruption (DI). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive).

For each CHC treatment exposure group, the percentage of serious rash episodes managed by a particular intervention are reported out of the total number of managed serious rash episodes with data available for that intervention (i.e. serious rash episodes with missing data for an intervention were excluded).

Up to 48 weeks of a treatment regimen

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Incidence of Anemia, Grade 3/4 Neutropenia, Grade 3/4 Thrombocytopenia, and Serious Skin Rash
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 48 weeks of treatment
The incidence (events per 1000 participant-days) of the protocol-defined HOIs (anemia, grade 3/4 neutropenia, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, and serious skin rash) was calculated over the 48-week period following the start of CHC treatment exposure. All protocol-defined HOIs were taken into account (serious and non-serious HOIs). For this analysis, participants were categorized by CHC treatment group of exposure, and could successively be assigned to different treatment groups of exposure depending on their treatment regimen (treatment groups were not mutually exclusive). The incidence per 1000 participant-days of anemia, grade 3/4 neutropenia, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, and serious skin rash were reported by CHC treatment group of exposure with 95% confidence intervals.
Up to 48 weeks of treatment

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de mayo de 2012

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de julio de 2015

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de julio de 2015

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

2 de febrero de 2012

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

28 de febrero de 2012

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

6 de marzo de 2012

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

16 de septiembre de 2016

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

28 de julio de 2016

Última verificación

1 de julio de 2016

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • P08518
  • EP08043.001 (Otro identificador: Merck Epidemiology Number)
  • SCH 503034 P08518 (Otro identificador: Schering Protocol Number)
  • MK-3034-072 (Otro identificador: Merck Protocol Number)

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Hepatitis C Crónica

3
Suscribir