Clinical Trial Page

Summary
EudraCT Number:2017-003643-38
Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:17-HPNCL-01
National Competent Authority:France - ANSM
Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
Trial Status:
Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2018-01-16
Trial results
A. Protocol Information
A.1Member State ConcernedFrance - ANSM
A.2EudraCT number2017-003643-38
A.3Full title of the trial
INTRANASAL KETAMINE IN THE REDUCTION OF THE ISOLATED FRACTURES OF THE HIGHER MEMBER OF THE CHILD TO PEDIATRIC EMERGENCIES
KETAMINE PAR VOIE INTRANASALE DANS LA REDUCTION DES FRACTURES ISOLEES DU MEMBRE SUPERIEUR DE L’ENFANT AUX URGENCES PEDIATRIQUES
A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
INTRANASAL KETAMINE IN THE REDUCTION OF THE ISOLATED FRACTURES OF THE HIGHER MEMBER OF THE CHILD TO PEDIATRIC EMERGENCIES
KETAMINE PAR VOIE INTRANASALE DANS LA REDUCTION DES FRACTURES ISOLEES DU MEMBRE SUPERIEUR DE L’ENFANT AUX URGENCES PEDIATRIQUES
A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
KETA PED
KETA PED
A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code number17-HPNCL-01
A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
B. Sponsor Information
B.Sponsor: 1
B.1.1Name of SponsorFondation Lenval - Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL
B.1.3.4CountryFrance
B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorNon-Commercial
B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportFondation Lenval - Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-LENVAL
B.4.2CountryFrance
B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
B.5.1Name of organisationCHU de Nice
B.5.2Functional name of contact pointClinical trials information
B.5.3 Address:
B.5.3.1Street Address4 avenue Reine Victoria
B.5.3.2Town/ cityNice
B.5.3.3Post code06003
B.5.3.4CountryFrance
B.5.4Telephone number+3304 92 0 34901
B.5.5Fax number+3304 92 03 40 75
B.5.6E-mailbailet.o2@chu-nice.fr
D. IMP Identification
D.IMP: 1
D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
D.2.1.1.1Trade name KETAMINE
D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderPANPHARMA
D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationFrance
D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
D.3 Description of the IMP
D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Injection
D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntranasal use (Noncurrent)
D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
D.3.8INN - Proposed INNKETAMINE
D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameKETAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE
D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB02830MIG
D.3.10 Strength
D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre
D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
D.3.10.3Concentration number50
D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
The IMP is a:
D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
D.IMP: 2
D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
D.2.1.1.1Trade name NITROUS OXIDE
D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderAIR LIQUIDE SANTE INTERNATIONAL
D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationFrance
D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
D.3 Description of the IMP
D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Inhalation vapour, liquid
D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPInhalation use
D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
D.3.8INN - Proposed INNNITROUS OXIDE
D.3.9.1CAS number 10024-97-2
D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameNITROUS OXIDE
D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB03447MIG
D.3.10 Strength
D.3.10.1Concentration unit % percent
D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
D.3.10.3Concentration number100
D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
The IMP is a:
D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
D.8 Information on Placebo
E. General Information on the Trial
E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
a fracture isolated from the distal end of the closed upper limb, requiring a reduction
une fracture isolée de l’extrémité distale du membre supérieur à foyer fermé, nécessitant une réduction
E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
a fracture isolated from the forearm, requiring a reduction
une fracture isolée de l'avant bras, nécessitant une réduction
E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Musculoskeletal Diseases [C05]
MedDRA Classification
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
E.1.2Version 20.0
E.1.2Level PT
E.1.2Classification code 10016997
E.1.2Term Forearm fracture
E.1.2System Organ Class 10022117 - Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
E.2 Objective of the trial
E.2.1Main objective of the trial
Evaluation of ketamine intranasal efficacy in combination with nitrous oxide in the reduction of closed fractures isolated from the upper limb in children in pediatric emergencies, DURING and AFTER the procedure.
Evaluation de l’efficacité de la kétamine par voie intranasale en association au protoxyde d’azote dans la réduction des fractures fermées isolées du membre supérieur chez l’enfant aux urgences pédiatriques, PENDANT et APRES la procédure.
E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
1. Evaluation of the degree of sedation during the gesture
2. Assessment of treatment tolerance in children during and after the procedure
3. Evaluation of the child's feeling of pain after the reduction
4. Evaluation of the feasibility of nurse preparation and administration.
1.Evaluation du degré de sédation pendant le geste
2.Evaluation de la tolérance du traitement chez l’enfant pendant et après le geste
3.Evaluation du ressenti de la douleur par l’enfant après la réduction
4.Evaluation de la faisabilité de la préparation et de l’administration du médicament par l’infirmière.
E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
E.3Principal inclusion criteria
-Male or Female Children
-Aged 4 to 17 years old
- Presenting a fracture isolated from the distal end of the upper limb with closed focus, requiring a reduction
- Fracture dating from <72h
- stable hemodynamics
- Affiliation to a social security scheme
- Signature of the authorization documents of the 2 parents or the representative of the parental authority for the participation of the child in the study
- Signature of informed consent for children over 15 years of age
-Enfants de sexe masculin ou féminin
-Agés de 4 ans à 17 ans révolus
-Présentant une fracture isolée de l’extrémité distale du membre supérieur à foyer fermé, nécessitant une réduction
-Fracture datant de < 72h
-Hémodynamique stable
-Affiliation à un régime de sécurité sociale
-Signature des documents d’autorisation des 2 parents ou du représentant de l’autorité parentale pour la participation de l’enfant à l’étude
-Signature du consentement éclairé pour les enfants de plus de 15 ans
E.4Principal exclusion criteria
-Known hypersensitivity to ketamine
-History of epilepsy or known psychiatric illness
-Any child with a developing respiratory disease (asthma, laryngitis, tracheitis)
-Any child who has received an analgesic of level 2 or 3 in the 3 hours preceding the treatment in pediatric emergencies
-High Blood Pressure
-Severe Heart Failure
-polytrauma
-Open fracture
-Proven pregnancy
- Any child requiring pure oxygen ventilation.
- Nitrous oxide should not be used in situations at risk of accumulation in cavities and when its expansion could be dangerous, such as cranial trauma with alteration of the state of consciousness, maxillofacial trauma, pneumothorax, gas embolism , bullous emphysema, sinus or middle ear surgery, internal ear surgery, severe abdominal distension (eg, bowel occlusion)
- A child who has recently received an ophthalmic gas (SF6, C3F8, C2F6) used in ocular surgery as long as a gas bubble persists inside the eye and at a minimum for a period of 3 months. Severe post-operative complications may occur in relation to increased intraocular pressure
Hypersensibilité connue à la kétamine
Antécédent d’épilepsie ou de maladie psychiatrique connue
Tout enfant présentant une affection respiratoire en cours d’évolution (asthme, laryngite, trachéite)
Tout enfant ayant reçu dans les 3h précédant la prise en charge aux urgences pédiatriques un antalgique de palier 2 ou 3
Hypertension artérielle
Insuffisance cardiaque sévère
Polytraumatisés
Fracture ouverte
Grossesse avérée
-Tout enfant nécessitant une ventilation en oxygène pur.
-Le protoxyde d'azote ne doit pas être utilisé dans les situations à risque d’accumulation dans des cavités et quand son expansion pourrait être dangereuse, telles que traumatisme crânien avec altération de l’état de conscience, traumatisme maxillofacial, pneumothorax, embolie gazeuse, emphysème bulleux, chirurgie des sinus ou de l’oreille moyenne, chirurgie de l’oreille interne, distension abdominale importante (ex : occlusion intestinale)
-Enfant ayant reçu récemment un gaz ophtalmique (SF6, C3F8, C2F6) utilisé dans la chirurgie oculaire tant que persiste une bulle de gaz à l'intérieur de l'œil et au minimum pendant une période de 3 mois. Des complications post-opératoires graves peuvent survenir en rapport avec l'augmentation de la pression intraoculaire
E.5 End points
E.5.1Primary end point(s)
The effectiveness of ketamine will be assessed by measuring pain control during and after fracture reduction. Measurement of pain intensity will be carried out using the EVENDOL 5-item hetero-evaluation of pain, validated in children.

Effective pain control will be defined by a score obtained with the EVENDOL <6/15 scale during reduction and after reduction. Our criterion will therefore be binary, control or not pain.
L’efficacité de la kétamine sera évaluée par la mesure du contrôle de la douleur pendant et après la réduction de la fracture. La mesure de l’intensité de la douleur sera réalisée grâce à l’échelle d’hétéro-évaluation de la douleur EVENDOL, caractérisée par 5 items et validée chez l’enfant.

Un contrôle efficace de la douleur sera défini par un score obtenu avec l’échelle EVENDOL < 6/15 pendant la réduction et après la réduction. Notre critère sera donc binaire, contrôle ou pas de la douleur.
E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
During and after the fracture reduction
pendant la réduction et après la réduction
E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
1. The evaluation of the degree of sedation will be made 5 minutes after the administration of the ketamine by the internationally validated anesthetic score "University of Michigan Sedation Scale" based on 5 items ranging from the state of awakening to no response to stimulation. The level of sedation sought is a score equal to 1 corresponding to a relaxed / sleeping patient and having an appropriate response to the weak stimulation. If the level of sedation is the one sought, the gesture of manual reduction of the fracture focus by aligning the bone fragments will be performed.

2. Treatment tolerance in children will be assessed through the collection of adverse reactions for the duration of the procedure, from the introduction of sedation to the end of the post-reduction period . Possible side effects are described in section 10 "Undesirable Events".

For each adverse event, the patient rate with at least one occurrence of the effect should be determined.

3. The assessment of the child's feeling of pain after the reduction will be carried out by a closed question:
"Have you had any pain?" Possible answers: No, Yes a little, Yes a lot.

4. The nurse's assessment of the feasibility of the preparation and administration of the medicinal product will be based on a questionnaire based on two closed questions on the timeliness of drug preparation and the ease of administration of the drug intranasally:
"Are you satisfied with the speed of preparation of intranasal ketamine? "
Answers: Not satisfied, Partially satisfied, Satisfied, Very satisfied

"Are you satisfied with the ease of administration of intranasal ketamine? "
Answers: Not satisfied, Partially satisfied, Satisfied, Very satisfied
1.l’évaluation du degré de sédation sera faite 5 minutes après l’administration de la kétamine par le score validé sur le plan anesthésique au niveau international « University of Michigan Sedation Scale » basé sur 5 items allant de l’état d’éveil à aucune réponse à la stimulation. Le niveau de sédation recherché est un score égal à 1 correspondant à un patient détendu(e) / endormi(e) et ayant une réponse appropriée à la stimulation faible. Si le niveau de sédation est celui recherché, le geste de réduction manuelle du foyer de fracture par alignement des fragments osseux sera réalisé.

2.La tolérance du traitement chez l’enfant sera évaluée par le recueil des effets indésirables sur toute la période de temps que durera la procédure, de la mise en place de la sédation jusqu’à la fin de la période de surveillance post-réduction. Les effets indésirables possibles sont décrits en section 10 « Evènements indésirables ».


Pour chaque effet indésirable, on déterminera le taux de patient présentant au moins une occurrence de l’effet.

3.l’évaluation du ressenti de la douleur par l’enfant après la réduction sera réalisée par une question fermée:
« Est-ce que tu as eu mal ? », réponses possibles : Non, Oui un peu, Oui beaucoup.

4.L’évaluation de la faisabilité de la préparation et de l’administration du médicament par l’infirmier(ère) sera réalisée au moyen d’un questionnaire, basée sur 2 questions fermées s’intéressant à la rapidité de préparation du médicament et la facilité d’administration du médicament par voie intranasale :
« Concernant la rapidité de préparation de la kétamine intranasal, êtes-vous satisfait ? »
Réponses : Pas satisfait, Partiellement satisfait, Satisfait, Très satisfait

« Concernant la facilité d’administration de la kétamine intranasal, êtes-vous satisfait ? »
Réponses : Pas satisfait, Partiellement satisfait, Satisfait, Très satisfait
E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
1. 5 minutes after the administration of the ketamine
2. for the duration of the procedure, from the introduction of sedation to the end of the post-reduction period
3. after the reduction
4. after the administration of the treatment
1. 5 minutes après l’administration de la kétamine
2.sur toute la période de temps que durera la procédure, de la mise en place de la sédation jusqu’à la fin de la période de surveillance post-réduction
3. après la réduction
4. après l’administration du médicament
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
E.6Scope of the trial
E.6.1Diagnosis No
E.6.2Prophylaxis No
E.6.3Therapy No
E.6.4Safety Yes
E.6.5Efficacy Yes
E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
E.6.8Bioequivalence No
E.6.9Dose response No
E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
E.6.13Others No
E.7Trial type and phase
E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
E.7.1.3Other No
E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) Yes
E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) No
E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
E.8 Design of the trial
E.8.1Controlled No
E.8.1.1Randomised No
E.8.1.2Open Yes
E.8.1.3Single blind No
E.8.1.4Double blind No
E.8.1.5Parallel group No
E.8.1.6Cross over No
E.8.1.7Other No
E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
E.8.2.2Placebo No
E.8.2.3Other No
E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned Yes
E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned No
E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States No
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA No
E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee No
E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
the end of the trial is he last visit of the last subjec
La fin de l'essai correspond à la dernière visite du dernier patient
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years1
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months6
E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days
F. Population of Trial Subjects
F.1 Age Range
F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 Yes
F.1.1Number of subjects for this age range: 60
F.1.1.1In Utero No
F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) Yes
F.1.1.5.1Number of subjects for this age range: 30
F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) Yes
F.1.1.6.1Number of subjects for this age range: 30
F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) No
F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) No
F.2 Gender
F.2.1Female Yes
F.2.2Male Yes
F.3 Group of trial subjects
F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
F.3.2Patients Yes
F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations No
F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception No
F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
F.3.3.4Nursing women No
F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
F.3.3.7Others No
F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
F.4.1In the member state60
F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
none
aucun
G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2019-02-28
N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial application
N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion
P. End of Trial
P.End of Trial Status
3
Subscribe