Working memory training in children with neuropsychiatric disorders and mild to borderline intellectual functioning, the role of coaching; a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Sammy Roording-Ragetlie, Helen Klip, Jan Buitelaar, Dorine Slaats-Willemse, Sammy Roording-Ragetlie, Helen Klip, Jan Buitelaar, Dorine Slaats-Willemse

Abstract

Background: Working memory training (WMT) has been shown to offer therapeutic benefits to both patients with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and patients with mild to borderline Intellectual Disabilities (MBID; 60 < IQ < 85). However, robust evidence for transfer effects and treatment benefits of WMT over placebo training are lacking. Owing to the nature of double-blind research designs in RCTs, children have received non-specific coaching not based on their actual training performance. Active coaching based on individual training results (such as in clinical practice) might enhance the efficacy of Cogmed WMT. Furthermore, clinical experience and the general treatment approach to these vulnerable children has shown that the intensity and duration of WMT is often too stressful. This study therefore investigated the efficacy of a less intensive, but more prolonged Cogmed WMT (including active personalized coaching and feedback) in reducing behavioral symptoms and improving neurocognitive functioning and academic achievements in children with MBID and neuropsychiatric disorders.

Methods/design: A double-blind RCT with children (age 10.0-13.11) with neuropsychiatric disorders (ADHD and/or autism spectrum disorder (ASD)) and MBID (IQ: 60 < IQ < 85). Two groups (each n = 26) will receive Cogmed WMT (version R/M) at home or at school for 8 weeks, 4 days a week, at 30 min a day. One group will receive active personalized coaching and feedback based on their actual individual performance during Cogmed training. The other group will only receive general non-personalized coaching (i.e. no receive personalized coaching and feedback). Both groups will undergo a neurocognitive assessment (working memory, executive functioning, academic achievements) before and after training and complete several questionnaires (behavioral problems, parenting style) with a 6 months follow-up.

Discussion: This study will add to the literature since the role of coaching in Cogmed WMT has not been studied before. It will also provide opportunities to investigate an alternative version of WMT in a large group of vulnerable children, for whom few evidence-based treatments are available. Ultimately, this will allow us to advise mental health care professionals and special education schools about the use of this type of intervention for children with MBID and neuropsychiatric disorders.

Trial registration: Dutch Trial Register. NTR5223 . Registration date 06-09-2015.

Keywords: ADHD; ASD; Coaching; Mild to borderline intellectual functioning; Randomized controlled trial; Working memory training.

References

    1. Strømme P, Diseth TH. Prevalence of psychiatric diagnoses in children with mental retardation: data from a population-based study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000:266–70.
    1. Shinaver CS, Entwistle PC, Söderqvist S. Cogmed WM training: reviewing the reviews. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2014;3:163–172. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2013.875314.
    1. Chacko A, Feirsen N, Bedard AC, Marks D, Uderman JZ, Chimiklis A. Cogmed working memory training for youth with ADHD: a closer examination of efficacy utilizing evidence-based criteria. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;0:1–15.
    1. Söderqvist S, Nutley SB, Ottersen J, Grill KM, Klingberg T. Computerized training of non-verbal reasoning and working memory in children with intellectual disability. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:1–8. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00271.
    1. Van der Molen MJ, Van Luit JEH, Van der Molen MW, Klugkist I, Jongmans MJ. Effectiveness of a computerized working memory training in children with mild intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010;54:433–447. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01285.x.
    1. Danielsson H, Zottarel V, Palmqvist L, Lanfranchi S. The effectiveness of working memory training with individuals with intellectual disabilities – a meta-analytic review. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1–10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01230.
    1. Hodgson K, Hutchinson AD, Denson L. Nonpharmacological treatments for ADHD. A meta-analytic review. J Atten Disorders. 2014;18:275–282. doi: 10.1177/1087054712444732.
    1. Sonuga-Barke EJS, Brandeis D, Cortese S, Daley D, Ferrin M, Holtmann M, et al. Nonpharmacological interventions for ADHD: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of dietary and psychological treatments. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170:275–289. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12070991.
    1. Rapport MD, Orban SA, Kofler MJ, Friedman LM. Do programs designed to train working memory, other executive functions, and attention benefit children with ADHD? A meta-analytic review of cognitive, academic, and behavioural outcomes. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33:1237–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.08.005.
    1. Van Dongen-Boomsma M, Vollebregt MA, Buitelaar JK, Slaats-Willemse D. Working memory training in young children with ADHD: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2014;55:886–896.
    1. Mawjee K, Woltering S, Lai N, Gotlieb H, Kronitz R, Tannock R. Working memory training in ADHD: controlling for engagement, motivation, and expectancy of improvement (pilot study). J Atten Disorders. 2014:1–13. doi:10.1177/1087054714557356.
    1. Richtlijn Effectieve Interventies LVB. Utrecht: Landelijk Kenniscentrum LVG; 2011.
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Press; 2000.
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Press; 2013.
    1. Shaffer D, Fisher P, Lucas CP, Dulcan MK, Schwab-Stone ME. NIMH diagnostic interview schedule for children version IV (NIMH DISC-IV): description, differences from previous versions, and reliability of some common diagnoses. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000;39:28–38. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200001000-00014.
    1. Berument SK, Rutter M, Lord C, Pickles A, Bailey A. Autism screening questionnaire: diagnostic validity. Br J Psychiatry. 1999;175:444–451. doi: 10.1192/bjp.175.5.444.
    1. Kort W, Schittekatte M, Bosmans M, Compaan EL, Dekker PH, Vermeir G, Verhaeghe P. Wechsler intelligence scale for children-III Nederlandse uitgave [WISC-III-NL] Amsterdam: Harcourt Test Publishers; 2005.
    1. Alloway TP. Automated working memory assessment. London: Harcourt Assessment; 2007.
    1. Pickering SJ, Gathercole SE. Working memory test battery for children. Londen: Psychological Corporation; 2001.
    1. De Sonneville L. Amsterdamse Neuropsychologische Taken [ANT] Amsterdam: Boom Testuitgevers; 2009.
    1. Zijlstra HP, Kingma A, Swaab H, Brouwer WH. Nepsy-II-nl. Enschede: Ipskamp; 2010.
    1. Brus BT, Voeten MJM. Eén minuut test. Nijmegen: Berkhout; 1973.
    1. De Vos T. Tempo Test Rekenen. Lisse: Swets Test Publishers; 1992.
    1. Frick PJ. The Alabama parenting questionnaire: University of Alabama; 1991.
    1. Luteijn E, Minderaa R, Jackson S. Vragenlijst voor Inventarisatie van Sociaal gedrag Kinderen [VISK] Amsterdam: Pearson Assessment and Information B.V; 2002.
    1. Scholte EM, Van der Ploeg JD. AVL ADHD-vragenlijst. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2005.
    1. Smidts D, Huizinga M. Executieve Functies Gedragsvragenlijst [BRIEF] Amsterdam: Hogrefe Uitgevers; 2009.
    1. Fuchs D, Fuchs LS. Test procedure bias: a meta-analysis of examiner familiarity effects. Rev Educ Res. 1986;56:243–262. doi: 10.3102/00346543056002243.
    1. Wickes TA., Jr Examiner influence in a testing situation. J Consult Psychol. 1956;20:23–26. doi: 10.1037/h0048983.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores e Colaboradores

Condições médicas

Intervenções de drogas

3
Se inscrever