Effects of working memory training in young and old adults

Claudia C von Bastian, Nicolas Langer, Lutz Jäncke, Klaus Oberauer, Claudia C von Bastian, Nicolas Langer, Lutz Jäncke, Klaus Oberauer

Abstract

Many cognitive abilities, including working memory and reasoning ability, decline with progressing age. In this study, we investigated whether four weeks of intensive working memory training would enhance working memory and reasoning performance in an age-comparative setting. Groups of 34 young (19-36 years) and 27 older (62-77 years) adults practiced tasks representing the three functional categories in the facet model of working memory capacity: storage and processing, relational integration, and supervision. The data were compared to those of a young and an old active control group who practiced tasks with low working memory demands. A cognitive test battery measuring near and far transfer was administered before and after training. Both age groups showed increased working memory performance in the trained tasks and in one structurally similar, but nontrained, task. Young adults also improved in a task measuring word-position binding in working memory. However, we found no far transfer to reasoning in either age group. The results provide evidence that working memory performance can be improved throughout the life span. However, in contrast to a previous study in which each facet of working memory capacity was trained separately, the present study showed that training multiple functional categories simultaneously induces less transfer.

References

    1. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Mar;10(3):131-8
    1. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
    1. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Dec;7(12):547-52
    1. Psychol Aging. 2008 Mar;23(1):104-18
    1. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2003 Jun;10(2):85-98
    1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):769-86
    1. Psychol Aging. 2010 Dec;25(4):767-78
    1. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Aug;134(3):368-87
    1. Psychol Aging. 2001 Mar;16(1):96-109
    1. Behav Res Methods. 2013 Mar;45(1):108-15
    1. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002 Sep;24(6):781-91
    1. Nature. 2010 Jun 10;465(7299):775-8
    1. Psychol Aging. 2002 Jun;17(2):299-320
    1. Science. 2008 Jun 13;320(5882):1510-2
    1. Neuropsychol Rev. 2009 Dec;19(4):504-22
    1. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Feb 15;2 Suppl 1:S167-79
    1. Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):765-77
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 May 13;105(19):6829-33
    1. Front Psychol. 2011 Oct 12;2:257
    1. Front Aging Neurosci. 2010 Jul 13;2:
    1. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Aug;136(3):414-29
    1. Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100
    1. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008 Jan;30(1):7-17
    1. Dev Sci. 2009 Jul;12(4):F9-15
    1. Cortex. 2013 Oct;49(9):2424-38
    1. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;14(7):317-24
    1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Apr;17(2):193-9
    1. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Feb;37(1):137-51
    1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):840-5
    1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Apr;57(4):594-603
    1. Dev Sci. 2009 Nov;12(6):978-90
    1. Gerontology. 2012;58(1):79-87
    1. Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):731-42
    1. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Mar 27;6:63
    1. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;44(2):177-86
    1. Science. 1996 Jan 5;271(5245):81-4
    1. Dev Psychol. 2005 Jul;41(4):661-71
    1. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Jan;139(1):124-36
    1. Curr Biol. 2010 Apr 27;20(8):R362-4
    1. Psychol Aging. 2011 Mar;26(1):15-20
    1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Feb;18(1):46-60
    1. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jul;62(7):1430-54
    1. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):359-79
    1. Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):720-30
    1. Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):743-53
    1. Mem Cognit. 2008 Dec;36(8):1470-83
    1. Psychol Aging. 2005 Dec;20(4):695-709
    1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):749-77
    1. Psychol Aging. 2011 Dec;26(4):813-22
    1. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Aug 17;6:221

Source: PubMed

3
Se inscrever