このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Developing a Practice-Based Learning and Improvement Quality Improvement (QI) Systems Impact Assessment Questionnaire

2015年4月27日 更新者:US Department of Veterans Affairs

Developing a PBLI QI Systems Impact Assessment Questionnaire

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) acknowledged the changing needs of physicians in training when it endorsed practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI) -- a competency that is typically omitted from medical curriculum. The goal is to have residents competent to investigate and evaluate their own patient care practices, integrate scientific evidence and be able to improve their practices. Available assessment tools do not adequately address all of the components of PBLI and few assessment tools attempt to capture the residents' ability to develop and implement clinically-based Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) projects that involve the practice setting. Curriculums without such foci miss the importance of system perspectives and opportunities for interprofessional team development. Our aim is to evaluate preliminary data on the curriculum we developed to address the gaps, to develop an assessment tool, and to provide methods for assessing the sustainability of system projects.

The key component of the curriculum is the integration of system quality improvement projects. PBLI curriculum was offered on alternate rotations. Preliminary data is available from 6 PBLI QI Systems Curriculum blocks (n=50) and 5 comparison blocks (n=42). Data includes closed- and open-ended questions designed to assess resident PBLI application skills, the notes and presentation slides for the residents' presentation.

調査の概要

状態

完了

条件

詳細な説明

Physicians in training operate in complex healthcare delivery systems but many have not been equipped with the knowledge or skills to analyze clinical environments and continually improve patient care.[1] Instead, their training emphasizes the clinical management of individual patients. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) acknowledged the changing needs of physicians in training when it endorsed one of two novel core competencies that are typically omitted from formal medical curriculum: practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI).[2,3] The ACGME's PBLI competency involves six points. The overall objective is to have residents competent to investigate and evaluate their own patient care practices, evaluate and integrate scientific evidence into their clinics and be able to improve their practices. However, the ACGME was not prescriptive about how to successfully implement and evaluate PBLI, and an established curriculum and validated assessment tool did not exist.[4] Efforts to date to develop an assessment tool provide a foundation, but none adequately addresses all of the components of PBLI as described by the ACGME. [3, 5-10] In particular, few assessment tools attempt to capture the residents' ability to develop and implement clinically-based CQI projects that involve the practice setting and assess impact on the practice setting and/or organization. Curriculums without such foci miss the importance of system perspectives, opportunities for interprofessional team development, and meaningful impacts on patient care at a broader organizational level.

After several iterations, a PBLI QI curriculum that addressed the gaps identified in many other curriculums was instituted. [11] The key component was the integration of system quality improvement projects that could evolve over several resident outpatient rotation blocks. Data from 11 blocks of the new curriculum is available for analysis. Data includes closed- and open-ended questions designed to assess resident PBLI application skills and the notes and presentation slides for the residents' presentation at the internal medicine's morbidity and mortality conference (IM MMC) at the end of each block. Funding would make it possible to more quickly evaluate the existing preliminary data. Our overall aim is to evaluate the preliminary data on the new curriculum and develop an assessment tool that addresses the six ACGME points and provides methods for assessing the sustainability of system projects. The next step will be to apply for a grant to more fully evaluate the curriculum and assessment tool.

研究の種類

観察的

入学 (実際)

92

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland、Ohio、アメリカ、44106
        • Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

25年~75年 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

受講資格のある性別

全て

サンプリング方法

非確率サンプル

調査対象母集団

Internal Medicine residents

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • None, data being used has already been collected from a previous study which the inclusion criteria included all Internal Medicine and Medicine-Pediatrics residents completing a 4 week ambulatory block from 2005-2006 were required to participate in the PBLI curriculum to satisfy an ACGME's core competency.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None, the residents from 2004 that did not complete a 4 week ambulatory block and residents participating in ambulatory block 7 and 13 were excluded from the study previously Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved and exempted study. Blocks 7 and 13 are not structured to permit teaching.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

コホートと介入

グループ/コホート
介入・治療
PBLI Curriculum group
To evaluate preliminary data on a PBLI curriculum grounded on QI system projects.
PBLI curriculum was offered on alternate rotations
Comparison group
Received a different curriculum.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Beliefs About Ability to Implement a CQI Project
時間枠:1 month
Residents' belief about their ability to implement a CQI project was measured using a single efficacy item (values ranged from 1, strongly disagree, to 5, strongly agree). The item is from the Systems Quality Improvement Training and Assessment Tool. Differences (post minus pre) in this belief item were looked at with positive and higher difference values reflecting more positive change/increase in belief.
1 month

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in Knowledge Scores About Quality Improvement
時間枠:1 Month
Residents' knowledge was assessed using the knowledge scale (e.g., describe change concept, how a cause-effect diagram is created, elements of the improvement model) from the SQI TAT and scores could range from 0 to 54 points. Difference scores were used based on total score of the scale with larger positive values indicating more increase in knowledge.
1 Month

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:David C Aron, MD MS、Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始

2008年1月1日

一次修了 (実際)

2008年7月1日

研究の完了 (実際)

2011年12月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2008年9月16日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2008年9月17日

最初の投稿 (見積もり)

2008年9月18日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (見積もり)

2015年5月12日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2015年4月27日

最終確認日

2015年4月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • SHP 08-194

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する