このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Care Transitions for Complex Patient - Cycle 1 and Cycle 2

2014年5月14日 更新者:Duke University

Improving Care Transitions for Complex Patients Through Decision Support

The purpose of this study is to improve patient care and safety while decreasing ED visit rates by sending specific information about care transitions related to hospital admission and discharge and emergency department and specialty care visits to primary care practices, care managers and patients with the use of health information technology (HIT) shared across a community-based network of providers.

Cycle 1 focuses on the impact of notices about ED encounters and hospitalizations derived from billing data that are sent to care managers for all 47,000 patients in the Northern Piedmont Community Care Network (NPCCN). Cycle 2 explores the impact of letters sent to patients, and care event reports sent to a patient's medical home in addition to notices sent to care managers about ED encounters, hospitalization and specialty care based on ADT (Admission Discharge Transfer) and billing data on 4,600 patients with complex health needs.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

This three-year project seeks to improve outcomes, quality and coordination of care for patients with complex healthcare needs by facilitating the availability of information following three types of care transitions into the ambulatory care setting. Specific information regarding care transitions will be made available to patients, primary care practitioners and care managers following hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) encounters, and specialty clinic evaluations.

This project will build upon a regional Health Information Exchange (HIE) network created to connect providers serving 47,000 Medicaid beneficiaries across traditional institutional boundaries from both rural and urban settings in a 6-county region in the Northern Piedmont of North Carolina. This network includes 25 ambulatory care practices, 3 federally qualified health centers, 4 rural health clinics, 3 urgent care facilities, 11 government agencies, 5 hospitals and 2 cross-disciplinary care management teams. Within this HIE network, 4,600 patients with complex healthcare needs have been identified.

For this project, a standards-based clinical decision support tool will be utilized in order to ensure that the proposed approach is generalized, portable, and scalable; and routinely available claims and scheduling data will be used as the primary data source. This approach will support both traditional clinic-based models of care as well as new care models including population health management and the use of cross-disciplinary teams.

Under Aim 1, the existing HIE network and decision support tool will be enhanced to enable detection of transitions in care and delivery of timely, patient-specific information regarding these care transitions to patients, primary care clinicians and multidisciplinary care management team members. Under Aim 2, the impact of the proposed approach will be evaluated in a two-cycle randomized controlled trial primarily involving approximately 47000 Medicaid beneficiaries with a special focus on 4600 patients with complex health needs, 309 primary care clinicians, and 31 care management workers. Cycle 1 will assess only daily notices sent to care managers and will use only billing data. Cycle 2 will evaluate all components of the proposed intervention and us both billing and ADT data (see below). For Cycle 1, patients will be randomly assigned by family unit to either receive or not receive email notices sent to their care managers. For Cycle 2 patients will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) information on care transitions sent to patients and their clinic-based caregivers; 2) information sent to patients, their clinic-based caregivers and their care managers; and 3) no information sent. The primary outcome measure will be the overall rate of ED utilization for each study group. Under Aim 3, the economic attractiveness of the proposed approach will be determined. Under Aim 4, the technology and results of this study will be disseminated through public media, publications and presentations. Information-augmented care transitions between sites should result in improved care coordination, higher quality of care, and more appropriate care.

This trial will be deployed in two cycles in order to support the needs of the care management network while the full intervention is developed. Cycle 1 will run from December, 2009 through December, 2010. It will assess the impact of notices about hospital admissions and ED encounters derived from billing data and sent daily to care managers for the 47,000 patients enrolled in NPCCN on the study outcomes. Cycle 2 will run from December, 2010 through December, 2011 and will address AIM 2 of the original grant proposal. For Cycle 2, events detected from ADT and billing data will be generated daily. The events will include hospital admissions, hospital discharges, ED encounters, and specialty care visits. The responses to events will include event summary reports sent to patients' assigned medical homes, letters sent to patients or their guardians, and release of information requests on behalf of a patient's medical home. The response will be generated for 4,600 patients identified as having complex health needs. In addition, notices will be sent to care managers for detected hospital and ED events for all 47,000 patients enrolled in NPCCN. Special priority will be given to patients with complex heath needs.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

8422

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • North Carolina
      • Durham、North Carolina、アメリカ、27710
        • Duke University Medical Center (Division of Clinical Informatics)

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 子
  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • North Carolina Medicaid beneficiary enrolled in the Northern Piedmont Community Care Network (NPCCN)
  • Has complex healthcare needs as defined by having two or more IOM (Institute of Medicine) priority conditions (hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, stroke, asthma, diabetes) OR one of the following: moderate to severe mental health diagnosis (schizophrenic disorder, episodic mood disorder, delusional disorder, non-organic psychosis, anxiety, dissociative-somatoform disorder, personality disorder), end-stage renal disease, sickle cell disease
  • Continuous enrollment in NPCCN for 10 of the previous 12 months

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
  • 割り当て:非ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Intermediate Intervention (arm #1)
Care transition reports sent to primary care clinics, care transition letters sent to patients, release of information requests about care transitions sent on behalf of primary care clinics.
Primary care event reports and patient letters
実験的:Full Intervention (arm #2)
E-mail notices sent to care managers about care transitions plus care transition reports sent to primary care clinics, care transition reports sent to patients, release of information requests about care transitions sent on behalf of primary care clinics.
Primary care event reports, patient letters and care manager notices
実験的:Control (arm #3)
Subjects assigned to the control group will receive "usual care" which is the standard of care coordination currently existent between patients, providers and care managers.
This is the study's control group

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
時間枠
Emergency department encounter rates among patients in the study population.
時間枠:6 months
6 months

二次結果の測定

結果測定
時間枠
Emergency department encounter rates for low severity diagnoses among all patients.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Total emergency department encounter rates among patients for whom intervention was appropriate.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Total emergency department encounter rates among all patients.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Hospitalization rates among patients for whom intervention was appropriate.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Hospitalization rates among all patients.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Hospital readmission rates within 30 days after hospitalization among patients for whom intervention was appropriate.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Hospital readmission rates within 30 days after hospitalization among all patients.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Primary care visit rates among patients following an emergency department encounter or hospitalization for whom intervention was appropriate.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Primary care visit rates among all patients following an emergency department encounter or hospitalization.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Rates of completion of medically-indicated post hospitalization studies or procedures among patients for whom intervention was appropriate.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Rates of completion of medically-indicated post hospitalization studies or procedures among all patients.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Total medical costs among patients for whom intervention was appropriate.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Total medical costs among all patients.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Emergency department costs among patients for whom intervention was appropriate.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Emergency department costs among all patients.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Hospitalization costs among patients for whom intervention was appropriate.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Hospitalization costs among all patients.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Outpatient costs among patients for whom intervention was appropriate.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Outpatient costs among all patients.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Patient satisfaction among patients for whom intervention was appropriate.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Patient-reported quality of life among patients for whom intervention was appropriate.
時間枠:6 months
6 months
Provider satisfaction among providers with contact with patients for whom intervention was appropriate.
時間枠:6 months
6 months

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Eric Eisenstein, DBA、Duke University

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始

2009年12月1日

一次修了 (実際)

2012年3月1日

研究の完了 (実際)

2012年9月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2009年12月23日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2009年12月23日

最初の投稿 (見積もり)

2009年12月24日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (見積もり)

2014年5月15日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2014年5月14日

最終確認日

2014年2月1日

詳しくは

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する