Evaluation of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Simulator
2019年2月20日 更新者:Unity Health Toronto
Evaluation of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Simulator to Improve Cognitive Surgical Knowledge of Obstetrics and Gynecology Trainees
This study aims to test the validity of a new educational tool in the form of a computer based video surgical simulator, that may be used to enhance the current teaching method of how to perform a hysterectomy.
調査の概要
状態
完了
詳細な説明
Ensuring the surgical competence of trainees is mandatory for all surgical residency programs, yet most evaluations of graduating residents are based on observation and subjective feedback.
We have developed a computer based video surgical simulator to facilitate cognitive knowledge of the step-by-step process needed to perform a laparoscopic hysterectomy, learn essential pelvic anatomy and avoid surgical complications.
Studies have shown that when trainees already have the cognitive knowledge of how to perform a procedure, they can focus more on learning surgical technique and how to minimize surgical complications.
Laparoscopy is becoming the standard of surgical care for gynecologic patients.
The benefits of minimally invasive surgery include reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization, less scarring, quicker return to normal activities, preservation of immune response, and fewer long-term problems such as adhesions or incisional hernia.
The current challenge in surgical education is how to produce competent surgeons who are skilled to perform and integrate the multiple advances in surgical technology.
Surgical competency involves proficiency in technical skills, decision-making (preoperative, operative, and postoperative), and team performance all of which require knowledge and communication skills.
The increasing complexity of surgery and the requirements for mastery at laparotomy, laparoscopy, and endoscopy reduces the feasibility of the traditional "see one, do one, teach one" model of surgical education.
Lack of training is considered a major barrier to performing laparoscopic surgery.
Alternative training modalities are required to acquire the necessary surgical skills for laparoscopy.
Although there is a transfer of skills and knowledge to the trainee by the time of graduation, current training programs have not been designed in a validated, effective, and competency-based manner.
A successful laparoscopic curriculum should incorporate a cognitive component in addition to the manual skills component.
Although the benefit of simulators as a method of surgical education has been validated, comprehensive curriculum development is lacking.
Most recently, Zevin et al. (2012) conducted a Delphi consensus involving international experts in surgical education on the principles for design, validation and implementation of a simulation-based surgical training curriculum.
The main components of the final framework included predevelopment analysis; cognitive, psychomotor, and team-based training; curriculum validation, evaluation, and improvement; and maintenance of training.
They have produced a framework that is based on the broad principles of educational theory that can be applied to any surgical specialty.
Several authors have emphasized the importance of cognitive teaching in a comprehensive surgical skills training curriculum.
Learning begins with the acquisition of procedure-specific knowledge.
Categories include pre-procedure assessment and preparation; anatomic knowledge; safety and limitations of specific instruments; ergonomics; and post-procedure management.
A cognitive curriculum can include reading materials in the form of text books or journal articles as well as procedural video tutorials.
The cognitive component should be studied by the trainee before technical skills training and should be followed by satisfactory performance on a paper-based test of knowledge or a mock operative note dictation.
Teaching about errors commonly associated with the procedure should be included so that trainees can anticipate or avoid them in the future, and recognize and manage them if they occur.
The purpose of this research study is to test the validity of a new educational tool as an enhancement to the current teaching method of how to perform a hysterectomy.
Should our data substantiate our hypothesis, that cognitive function of surgical trainees will be enhanced by use of the trainer, then the tool will be able to be utilized as a new, advanced, creative tool for teaching how to perform a hysterectomy.
This tool might then be able to be utilized to advance the teaching of many other surgical procedures to residents in many different surgical programs.
研究の種類
介入
入学 (実際)
45
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles、California、アメリカ、90033
- University of Southern California, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
-
Los Angeles、California、アメリカ、90095
- University of California Los Angeles, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle、Washington、アメリカ、98195
- University of Washington, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
-
-
-
-
Heidelberglaan
-
Utrecht、Heidelberglaan、オランダ、3508 GA
- University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
-
-
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver、British Columbia、カナダ、V5Z 1M9
- University of British Columbia, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto、Ontario、カナダ、M5S 1A8
- University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 子
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
受講資格のある性別
全て
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Faculty in the Department of Ob-Gyn
- Experienced OBGYN surgeons
- Residents in the Department of Ob-Gyn
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:支持療法
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
介入なし:conventional residency training
no intervention
|
|
|
実験的:Laparoscopic Hysterectomy trainer
Intervention: An educational video and web-based e-module will be created.
The final product will be reviewed by the expert contributors.
Once approved, these tools will be showcased to a voluntary focus group of Obstetrics and Gynecology residents at the University of Toronto.
A quantitative assessment of effectiveness of this tool will be performed through the use of pre- and post-tests of knowledge.
A qualitative needs assessment will also be performed using post-viewing surveys.
If found to be effective, this educational tool will be incorporated in the University of Toronto Obstetrics and Gynecology residency curriculum.
|
In order to increase comfort level amongst Gynecologists, we aim to identify verbal and non-verbal components of teaching TLH through interview and video recordings.
Utilizing qualitative analysis of common themes, we will develop an educational video and web-based e-module to be used by Gynecology residents and surgeons.
We will also use a combination of quantitative pre- and post-tests and qualitative surveys to assess the effectiveness of such a training tool.
Ultimately, the project aims to create a robust tool that can be implemented in Gynecology residencies.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of residents using validation tool
時間枠:7-10 days
|
Phase I will consist of two on line tests that assess surgical and anatomic knowledge.
The tests will be separated by 7-10 days.
Evaluation will determine the validity of the tests as well as creating a "knowledge curve."
Analyzing resident and faculty performance with a one-way analysis of variance, with level of training as the independent variable, will assess construct validity.
Post hoc contrasts are done with Student-Newman-Keuls test.
We will also evaluate the validity of the exam by comparing the performance of novice surgeons with more advanced residents and experts.
Internal consistency of the examination, which is a measure of the reliability of the test, will be calculated using Cronbach's alpha test.
Results will be presented as percentages, means and standard deviations based on the number of questions that are answered correctly.
|
7-10 days
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of experts using validation tool
時間枠:7-10 days
|
Phase I will consist of two on line tests that assess surgical and anatomic knowledge.
The tests will be separated by 7-10 days.
Evaluation will determine the validity of the tests as well as creating a "knowledge curve."
Analyzing resident and faculty performance with a one-way analysis of variance, with level of training as the independent variable, will assess construct validity.
Post hoc contrasts are done with Student-Newman-Keuls test.
We will also evaluate the validity of the exam by comparing the performance of novice surgeons with more advanced residents and experts.
Internal consistency of the examination, which is a measure of the reliability of the test, will be calculated using Cronbach's alpha test.
Results will be presented as percentages, means and standard deviations based on the number of questions that are answered correctly.
|
7-10 days
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Dr. Satkunaratnam Abheha, MD、Unity Health Toronto
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
2014年7月1日
一次修了 (実際)
2018年7月1日
研究の完了 (実際)
2018年7月1日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2014年8月6日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2014年9月4日
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
2014年9月9日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2019年2月22日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2019年2月20日
最終確認日
2019年2月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
その他の研究ID番号
- 30509
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
未定
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。