Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Cross-shaped Incision Technique
2021年1月8日 更新者：Wen Luo
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Cross-shaped Incision Technique to Thick-gingiva and Thin-gingiva Patients Treated With Implant-supported Fixed Prosthesis
To evaluate a cross-shaped incision technique to thick-gingiva and thin-gingiva patients treated with implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
Objective: To evaluate a cross-shaped incision technique to thick-gingiva and thin-gingiva patients treated with implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
Methods and Materials: 55 patients received cross-shaped incision were assigned into thick-gingiva group (29 cases) and thin-gingiva group (26 cases).
Follow-up examination was carried out 3 and 12 months after final restoration.
Clinical and radiographic evaluation including gingival papilla height, modified plaque index, modified sulcus bleeding index, periodontal depth, and crestal marginal bone level were utilized.
研究の種類
観察的
入学 (実際)
55
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
Sichuan
-
Chengdu、Sichuan、中国、610041
- West China Hospital of Stomatology
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 子
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
はい
受講資格のある性別
全て
サンプリング方法
確率サンプル
調査対象母集団
The study samples were comprised of patients who had been treated with one bone-level implant (Osstem, Korea) insertion in the first molar region.
Fifty-five subjects were selected from the patients who came to the Department of Oral Implantology, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University in China between June 2018 and June 2020.
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Good general health, no chronic systemic diseases.
- All subjects included in this study needed to have one missing premolar or molar teeth with adjacent natural teeth.
- All subjects included in the study had been treated with one bone-level implant insertion in the premolar or molar region.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active periodontal infections.
- Heavy smoking habit (>10 cigarettes per day).
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
コホートと介入
グループ/コホート |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
thick-gingiva group
After insertion of the probe into the facial aspect of the sulcus, the peri-implant biotype can be categorized as thick-gingiva (outline if the probe cannot be seen through the gingival)
|
|
|
thin-gingiva group
After insertion of the probe into the facial aspect of the sulcus, the peri-implant biotype can be categorized as thin-gingiva (outline of the probe can be seen through the gingival)
|
The biotype of gingival was also determined by periodontal probe.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
papilla height
時間枠：Between June 2018 and June 2020.
|
Presence/absence of papilla height was assessed visually
|
Between June 2018 and June 2020.
|
|
Modified Plaque Index (mPI)
時間枠：Between June 2018 and June 2020.
|
plaque accumulation around the marginal peri-implant tissue was assessed
|
Between June 2018 and June 2020.
|
|
Modified Sulcus Bleeding Index
時間枠：Between June 2018 and June 2020.
|
the bleeding tendency of the marginal peri-implant tissue was evaluated
|
Between June 2018 and June 2020.
|
|
Probing Depth (PD, in millimeters)
時間枠：Between June 2018 and June 2020.
|
PD was assessed at the mid-buccal, mid-oral, mesial and distal aspects of each implant with a standard periodontal probe, and final value was determined by the average of four aspects
|
Between June 2018 and June 2020.
|
|
Gingival margin level
時間枠：Between June 2018 and June 2020.
|
Gingival margin level was assessed by calculating the vertical distance between the most apical point of gingival margin at the buccal aspect of the crown and line connecting the peak of the adjacent mesial and distal natural teeth
|
Between June 2018 and June 2020.
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
first bone-implant contact (fBIC) and implant shoulder (IS)
時間枠：Between June 2018 and June 2020.
|
the landmarks of first bone-implant contact (fBIC) and implant shoulder (IS) were used for measurements.
fBIC-IS was defined as the vertical distance the first bone-implant contact to implant shoulder, and the distance was assessed at the mesial and distal aspect of implant, respectively.
When the marginal crestal bone was located coronal to the IS, a positive (+) value was given, where a negative (-) value when located apically to the IS, the value was deemed as zero when IS and fBIC coincided.
|
Between June 2018 and June 2020.
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
スポンサー
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
一般刊行物
- [1] Du H, Gao M, Qi C, Liu S, Lin Y. Drug-induced gingival hyperplasia and scaffolds: they may be valuable for horizontal food impaction. Med Hypotheses 2010;74:984-5. [2] Bidra AS. Nonsurgical management of inflammatory periimplant disease caused by food impaction: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:96-100. [3] Koori H, Morimoto K, Tsukiyama Y, Koyano K. Statistical analysis of the diachronic loss of interproximal contact between fixed implant prostheses and adjacent teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:535-40. [4] Gastaldo JF, Cury PR, Sendyk WR. Effect of the vertical and horizontal distances between adjacent implants and between a tooth and an implant on the incidence of interproximal papilla. J Periodontol 2004;75:1242-6. [5] Chow YC, Wang HL. Factors and techniques influencing peri-implant papillae. Implant Dent 2010;19:208-19. [6] Müller HP, Heinecke A, Schaller N, Eger T. Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27:621-6. [7] Yao JW, Wang HL. Assessment of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Adaptive Pressure and Time After Provisional Restorations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2019;39: 809-15. [8] Salama H, Salama M. The role of orthodontic extrusive remodeling in the enhancement of soft and hard tissue profiles prior to implant placement: a systematic approach to the management of extraction site defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent1993;13,312-33. [9] Man Y, Wang Y, Qu Y, Wang P, Gong P. A palatal roll envelope technique for peri-implant mucosa reconstruction: a prospective case series study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:660-5. [10] Agarwal C, Deora S, Abraham D, Gaba R, Kumar BT,Kudva P. Vascularized interpositional periosteal connective tissue flap: A modern approach to augment soft tissue. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2015;19:72-7. [11] Man Y , Wu Q , Wang T , Gong P, Gong T , Qu Y. Split pedicle roll envelope technique around implants and pontics: a prospective case series study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;44:1295-301. [12] Urdaneta RA, Daher S, Lery J, Emanuel K, Chuang SK. Factors associated with crestal bone gain on single-tooth locking-taper implants: the effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26, 1063-78. [13] De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:,428-33. [14] Ronay V, Sahrmann P, Bindl A, Attin T, Schmidlin PR. Current status and perspectives of mucogingival soft tissue measurement methods. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011;23:146-56. [15] Mombelli A, Van Oosten MA, Schurch EJ, Lan NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987;2:145-51. [16] Chang M, Wennström JL, Odman P, Andersson B. Implant supported single-tooth replacements compared to contralateral natural teeth. Crown and soft tissue dimensions. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10: 185-94. [17] Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:635-41. [18] Kajiwara N , Masaki C, Mukaibo T,Kondo Y, Nakamoto T, Hosokawa R. Soft tissue biological response to zirconia and metal implant abutments compared with natural tooth: microcirculation monitoring as a novel bioindicator. Implant Dent 2015;24:37-41. [19] Cooper LF, Ellner S, Moriarty J, Felton DA, Paquette D, Molina A, et al. Three-year evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:791-800. [20] Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Liddelow G, Henry P, Goodacre CJ. Periimplant tissue response following immediate provisional restoration of scalloped implants in the esthetic zone: a one-year pilot prospective multicenter study. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:109-18. [21] Al-Juboori MJ. Interdental Implant Papillae Grow up with Temporary Abutment displaced at Monthly Intervals. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16:422-6. [22] Finelle G, Papadimitriou D, Souza A, Katebi N,Gallucci G, Araújo M. Peri-implant soft tissue and marginal bone adaptation on implant with non-matching healing abutments: micro-CT analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:42-6. [23] Farronato D, Santoro G, Canullo L, Botticelli D, Maiorana C, Lang N. Establishment of the epithelial attachment and connective tissue adaptation to implants installed under the concept of
- Luo W, Wang X, Chen Y, Hong Y, Qu Y, Man Y, Wu Y. Radiographic evaluation of a cross-shaped incision technique for thick-gingiva and thin-gingiva patients treated with implant-supported fixed prosthesis. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Dec 18;21(1):655. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-02019-8.
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
2018年6月1日
一次修了 (実際)
2020年6月1日
研究の完了 (実際)
2020年6月1日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2021年1月5日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2021年1月8日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2021年1月12日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2021年1月12日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2021年1月8日
最終確認日
2021年1月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 2009033
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
いいえ
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
いいえ
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
いいえ
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。