このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Multicenter Clinical Cohort Study of Modified Flexible Fixation Latarjet Procedure for Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation

2021年9月8日 更新者:Shenzhen Second People's Hospital

The shoulder joint is the most flexible joint of human body and shoulder joint dislocation is the most common joint dislocation of human body. Currently, there are different treatments for anterior shoulder dislocation, but for young patients with high sports requirements and apparent glenoid defect, soft tissue repair is not enough otherwise patients will suffer a high recurrent rate.

In 1954, M. Latarjet invented the coracoid process osteotomy and transposition technique, called the Latarjet procedure, which was a bony repair technique and was later promoted by G. Walch. This technique not only reconstructs the defect glenoid, the sling effect attached to the conjoint tendon also strengthens the anterior and inferior structure. Due to the advantages of low recurrence rate after Latarjet procedure, high rate of patients returning to sports and high satisfaction, it has become the only surgery that has been widely used in more than ten similar surgeries in history. In 2007, French physician Lafosse successfully completed the technique under arthroscopy. However, this surgery traditionally uses screws to fix the bone block, but screw fixation has difficulties like exposed nail head, uncertain bone block positioning, and high absorption rate of the bone block. In 2012, P.Boileau further improved this technique, innovating to avoid the above-mentioned complications through suture button fixation. However, since the Latarjet procedure was invented for decades, scholars have been worried about the unavoidable defects of this technique including the destruction of the coracoacomial arch, pectoralis minor injury and a series of complications caused by non-anatomical reconstruction of the glenoid.

In order to further develop this technology, make it more simple, easy to promote, and safer, based on our clinical and basic research on flexible fixation Latarjet technique for more than 8 years, we have innovatively developed an individualized and improved flexible fixation Latarjet technique that preserves the coracoacomial arch. We assumed that our modified technique, which retains the coracoacomial arch, 1) has the same satisfactory clinical effect. 2) The individualized reconstruction of glenoid defect is more identical with the biomechanics of the shoulder joint. The bone block will finally be remodeled according to the best fit circle. 3) The tiny subscapular tendon split is less damaged and safer.

調査の概要

状態

まだ募集していません

条件

研究の種類

介入

入学 (予想される)

364

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

  • 名前:Liu Haifeng, MD
  • 電話番号:+8613713899307
  • メール819811255@qq.com

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年~59年 (大人)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-59 years, gender unlimited.
  • Patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation who were judged by clinicians to be suitable for modified flexible fixation Latarjet procedure according to surgical indications (1. Glenoid bone defect>20% 2. Glenoid defect>15% and ISIS>6 3. Glenoid defect>10% and competitive athletes)
  • Volunteers to join the study and sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical and imaging diagnosis combined with other shoulder diseases, such as frozen shoulder, rotator cuff injury, shoulder joint degeneration.
  • Basic diseases of important organs ( including severe osteoporosis, dysfunction of important organs, connective tissue diseases, neuropsychiatric disorders, epilepsy, etc. )

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:なし
  • 介入モデル:単一グループの割り当て
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
実験的:Individualized Lutajet operative group
Arthroscopic modified individualized flexible Latarjet procedure with preservation of the coracoacromial arch. During the procedure, we perform coracoid osteotomy with preservation of coracoacromial arch, then split subscapular tendon, transfer the bone graft and fix it with double button under arthroscopy.
The modifications were as follows: (1)the coracoid graft and conjoint tendon were prepared using a mini-open technique with an incision of 2.5 cm and coracoacromial ligament were preserved. A total of 2 bone tunnels were drilled. (2)The anterior (including part of the incision used for obtaining the graft), standard antelateral, and posterior portals were set. (3) The glenoid was marked at the 4-o'clock position, and then the subscapularis muscle was split. (4)The glenoid tunnel was drilled where the suture linked to the graft was passed, and the graft was pulled to the glenohumeral joint via the sutures. A knotless suture anchor for antirotation (PushLock; Arthrex) was fixed to the glenoid to prevent rotation of the graft.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in the Rowe Score
時間枠:Preoperative, Day 1, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Dr. Carter R. Rowe, an orthopedic shoulder specialist at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, USA, proposed in the JBJS magazine in the United States in 1978 that the Rowe score scale for the evaluation of the clinical effects of repair surgery for shoulder joint instability. Including stability, mobility and functional evaluation, the higher the score, the higher the stability and the better the shoulder function.
Preoperative, Day 1, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Change in the ASES score
時間枠:Preoperative, Day 1, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
The ASES (American Association of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery scores) are the shoulder joint function evaluation standards adopted by the American Association of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons in 1993. The system is a percentile system that needs to be converted. The pain in the assessment part of the patient and the cumulative daily activities each account for 50%. The full score is 100 points. The higher the score, the better the shoulder joint function.
Preoperative, Day 1, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Change in the Constant-Murley score
時間枠:Preoperative, Day 1, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
The Constant-Murley Shoulder Scoring Scale was designed by Christopher Constant and Alan Murley in 1986. It is mainly used to assess the severity of shoulder-related diseases. The scale has good reliability and validity, including pain and function. , Mobility and muscle strength, the total score is 100, the higher the score, the better the function.
Preoperative, Day 1, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Change in the Visual Analogue Scale
時間枠:Preoperative, Day 1, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
The visual analogue scale (VAS) is used for pain assessment. It is widely used in clinical practice in China. The basic method is to use a moving ruler about 10cm long, with 10 scales on one side, and the two ends are respectively "0" and "10" points. A point of 0 means no pain. A score of 10 represents the most severe pain that is unbearable.
Preoperative, Day 1, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Change in the Range of Motion
時間枠:Preoperative, Day 1, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
The degree of movement of the shoulder joint can reflect the recovery of shoulder joint function, including flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, external rotation and internal rotation.
Preoperative, Day 1, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Change in the bone healing
時間枠:Preoperative, Day 1, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Through CT scan and 3D reconstruction, we detect the change of bone healing and reshaping during different time period.
Preoperative, Day 1, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Change in the Samilson-Prieto score
時間枠:Preoperative, Day 1, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Through X ray of true AP view to evaluate the degeneration of the shoulder joint
Preoperative, Day 1, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (予想される)

2021年10月1日

一次修了 (予想される)

2024年10月1日

研究の完了 (予想される)

2025年3月31日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2021年7月27日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2021年9月8日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2021年9月17日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2021年9月17日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2021年9月8日

最終確認日

2021年9月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • LUWEI

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する