KALM-B: Ketamine-assisted Psychotherapy (KAP) to Lessen Morbidity After Burn Injury (KALM-B)
調査の概要
状態
詳細な説明
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE Burn injuries are among the most devastating forms of trauma, often resulting in significant physical pain and long-term psychological distress. Survivors frequently experience acute stress disorder (ASD), which may progress to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and chronic opioid dependence. PTSD has been documented in up to 45% of military burn survivors and approximately one-third of civilians with severe burn trauma. Despite improvements in surgical and rehabilitative care, the psychological sequelae of burn injuries remain under-recognized and under-treated.
The immediate post-injury period is marked by elevated stress and emotional dysregulation, yet access to timely, structured mental health interventions is limited. Traditional approaches often fail to reach patients during this critical window. At the University of Utah Burn Center, which treats over 450 inpatients and 6,500 outpatients annually, there is an urgent need for feasible and scalable approaches to address psychological distress early in the recovery process.
Ketamine-assisted psychotherapy (KAP) combines the administration of ketamine, a dissociative anesthetic with well-documented rapid-onset antidepressant properties, with psychotherapeutic support in a controlled clinical environment. KAP has shown potential in other trauma-affected populations and is being explored for its ability to support emotional processing, reduce distress, and potentially interrupt the progression from acute stress to more persistent mental health disorders. However, its use in the context of acute burn injury has not been systematically evaluated.
The KALM-B Study (Ketamine-Assisted Therapy to Lessen Morbidity after Burn Injury) is a pilot project designed to assess the safety and feasibility of implementing KAP in recently burned patients with acute stress symptoms. The study will recruit 12 adult patients who screen positive for acute stress symptoms during their hospitalization and offer participation in up to two KAP sessions following discharge, delivered in partnership with the Huntsman Mental Health Institute.
The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of KAP after burn and the feasibility of recruitment, enrollment, and completion of the study intervention. Secondary objectives include assessing the safety and tolerability of KAP in this unique patient population. Exploratory objectives will descriptively assess changes in symptoms of acute stress, anxiety, depression, and opioid use through 6 months post-intervention.
This study represents a first step toward understanding how novel trauma-informed interventions might be integrated into early burn care. By characterizing feasibility, safety, and symptom trends over time, KALM-B will provide foundational data to inform future research and potential care models aimed at supporting psychological recovery after burn injury.
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
段階
- フェーズ2
連絡先と場所
研究連絡先
- 名前:Claire Ausbeck, BA
- 電話番号:18014033671
- メール:claire.ausbeck@hsc.utah.edu
研究場所
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City、Utah、アメリカ、84102
- University of Utah Health
-
コンタクト:
- Claire Ausbeck, BA
- 電話番号:801-213-1223
- メール:claire.ausbeck@hsc.utah.edu
-
主任研究者:
- Irma Fleming, MD
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects 18 - 65 yrs with > 15 % Total Body Surface Area Burns.
- National Stressful Events Survey Acute Stress Disorder Short Scale (NSESSS) average total score>= 2 (severity scale of none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), or extreme (4) ) prior to discharge from UUH.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Allergy or previous adverse reactions to ketamine
- Pending surgical interventions
- Active systemic infection, sepsis, or hemodynamic instability
- Physical limitations from burn injury that preclude safe travel to outpatient visits or positioning for therapy.
- Lack of reliable transportation, caregiver support, or housing stability.
- Language barrier
- Personal history or first- or second-degree relatives with schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder, delusional disorder, schizoaffective disorder, psychosis, or other psychotic spectrum illness.
- Currently meeting DSM-5 criteria for Dissociative Disorder, or other psychiatric conditions judged to be incompatible with the establishment of rapport or safe exposure to ketamine.
- Currently meeting DSM-5 criteria for Cluster B Personality Disorder.
- Severe depression requiring immediate standard-of-care treatment (e.g., hospitalization).
- Suicidal ideation over the past month as assessed as a yes to question 3, 4, or 5 on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale, Suicidal Ideation section
- Current or prior history of PTSD diagnosis
- Current or history within the last two years of meeting DSM-V criteria of substance use disorder (excluding caffeine and nicotine).
- Current substance use disorders may be identified through the drug urine screening test or undergoing treatment (methadone/Suboxone) .
- Congestive heart failure, including all New York Heart Association Classes.
- Angina pectoris, cardiac hypertrophy, cardiac ischemia, myocardial infarction
- Uncontrolled hypertension at the time of enrollment (BP>140 systolic or 90 diastolic), coronary artery disease, artificial heart valve
- Prolonged or congenital long QT syndrome (>450 ms), serious cardiac arrhythmias, tachycardia, a clinically significant screening ECG abnormality
- History of hypersensitivity to ketamine
- Receiving ketamine treatments for psychiatric condition within the past 6 months
- Seizure disorder
- Moderate to severe dementia
- History of significant traumatic brain injury
- Requires the use of supplemental oxygen.
- Require Propranolol for Burn Hypermetabolism
- Any other condition that would, in the Investigator's judgment, contraindicate the subject's participation in the clinical study due to safety concerns or compliance with clinical study procedures (e.g., infection/inflammation, intestinal obstruction, unable to swallow medication, [patients may not receive the drug through a feeding tube], social/ psychological issues, etc.)
- Subjects taking prohibited medications. A washout period of prohibited medications for a period of at least five half-lives should occur prior to study registration. These medications include antipsychotic medications, doses of benzodiazepines in excess of 20mg diazepam equivalents per day.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:処理
- 割り当て:なし
- 介入モデル:単一グループの割り当て
- マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:Ketamine-Assisted Psychotherapy
All 12 study participants will be assigned to receive KAP treatment.
|
A preparatory session will be completed with the subject by a trained psychotherapist to prepare them for the 1st Ketamine treatment
Ketamine will be administered intra-muscularly at a starting dose of 0.5 mg/kg and can be titrated up to 1.0 mg/kg, to a maximum of 60 mg, based on patient response.
The first study intervention for KAP will include a preparatory session a 2.5-3 hour therapy session.
The second study intervention for KAP will include a 2.5-3 hour therapy session.
An integration session will be held with a trained psychotherapist after the 2nd Ketamine administration
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Safety and Tolerability defined by the number of participants with treatment-related adverse events
時間枠:From baseline through 6 months post-treatment follow-up (assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months)
|
Assess the safety and tolerability of KAP in the burn population.
Safety and Tolerability will be measure by the frequency of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) characterized by type, severity (as defined by the NIH CTCAE, version 5.0), seriousness, duration, and relationship to study treatment.
|
From baseline through 6 months post-treatment follow-up (assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months)
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility - Recruitment rate
時間枠:From study opening to completion of recruitment, up to 24 months
|
The proportion of eligible participants who provided informed consent
|
From study opening to completion of recruitment, up to 24 months
|
|
Feasibility - Treatment Completion Rate
時間枠:From enrollment through completion of all scheduled KAP sessions, assessed up to 12 weeks
|
Proportion of participants who complete all scheduled KAP sessions.
|
From enrollment through completion of all scheduled KAP sessions, assessed up to 12 weeks
|
|
Feasibility - Follow-up Completion Rate
時間枠:From baseline through 6 months post-treatment follow-up (assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months)
|
Proportion of participants who complete follow-up assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months.
|
From baseline through 6 months post-treatment follow-up (assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months)
|
|
Timeliness of Intervention Delivery
時間枠:Baseline (from injury to initiation of treatment; up to 12 months)
|
Time from injury to initiation of the KAP intervention, defined as the number of days between the date of injury and the date of first KAP session.
|
Baseline (from injury to initiation of treatment; up to 12 months)
|
|
Opioid Use
時間枠:From baseline through 6 months post-treatment follow-up (assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months)
|
Total opioid use (MME) at discharge and up to 6 months post-KAP.
|
From baseline through 6 months post-treatment follow-up (assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months)
|
|
Acute Stress Symptoms based on National Stressful Events Survey Acute Stress Disorder Short Scale (NSESSS)
時間枠:From baseline through 6 months post-treatment follow-up (assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months)
|
Change in acute stress symptoms from baseline to post-treatment follow-up, measured using the National Stressful Events Survey Acute Stress Disorder Short Scale (NSESSS). Scoring and Interpretation: Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (0=Not at all; 1=A little bit; 2=Moderately; 3=Quite a bit, and 4=Extremely). The total score can range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating greater severity of acute stress disorder. The raw scores on the 7 items should be summed to obtain a total raw score. In addition, the clinician is asked to calculate and use the average total score. The average total score reduces the overall score to a 5-point scale, which allows the clinician to think of the severity of the individual's acute stress disorder in terms of none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), or extreme (4). |
From baseline through 6 months post-treatment follow-up (assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months)
|
|
Incidence of PTSD based on PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
時間枠:From baseline through 6 months post-treatment follow-up (assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months)
|
Incidence of progression from acute stress to PTSD at follow-up, based on DSM-5 criteria and assessed using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). The PCL-5 can be scored to provide a provisional PTSD diagnosis. Scoring and Interpretation: The PCL-5 is a 20-item self-report questionnaire assessing DSM-5 PTSD symptoms, scored from 0-80 by summing items rated 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Extremely"). A total score of 31-33 or higher typically indicates a probable PTSD diagnosis, though 32 is often used. A 5-point change represents a clinically significant change. |
From baseline through 6 months post-treatment follow-up (assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months)
|
|
Anxiety Symptoms based on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale
時間枠:From baseline through 6 months post-treatment follow-up (assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months)
|
Change in anxiety symptoms from baseline to follow-up, measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7). Scoring and Interpretation: The GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) is a 7-item, self-report scale used to measure anxiety severity, with a total score range of 0-21. Scores are calculated by summing the ratings (0-3) for seven questions, with cut-offs of 5, 10, and 15 representing: 0-4: Minimal or no anxiety 5-9: Mild anxiety (monitor; consider lifestyle changes) 10-14: Moderate anxiety (clinically significant; consider counseling/medication) 15-21: Severe anxiety (refer to a mental health professional) Cut-off for Diagnosis: A score of 10 or higher is generally used to identify potential Generalized Anxiety Disorder. |
From baseline through 6 months post-treatment follow-up (assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months)
|
|
Depressive Symptoms based on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Screening tool
時間枠:From baseline through 6 months post-treatment follow-up (assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months)
|
Change in depressive symptoms from baseline to follow-up, measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 is scored by summing 9 items (0-3 each) to a total of 0-27, with higher scores indicating severe depression. Interpretation of Total Score: 0-4: Minimal or None 5-9: Mild depression (suggests monitoring) 10-14: Moderate depression (suggests treatment) 15-19: Moderately severe depression (often requires active treatment) 20-27: Severe depression (usually requires immediate intervention) |
From baseline through 6 months post-treatment follow-up (assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months)
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Irma Fleming, MD、The University of Utah
- 主任研究者:Benjamin Lewis, MD、The University of Utah
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Singh JB, Fedgchin M, Daly EJ, De Boer P, Cooper K, Lim P, Pinter C, Murrough JW, Sanacora G, Shelton RC, Kurian B, Winokur A, Fava M, Manji H, Drevets WC, Van Nueten L. A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Frequency Study of Intravenous Ketamine in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Aug 1;173(8):816-26. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16010037. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
- Feder A, Parides MK, Murrough JW, Perez AM, Morgan JE, Saxena S, Kirkwood K, Aan Het Rot M, Lapidus KA, Wan LB, Iosifescu D, Charney DS. Efficacy of intravenous ketamine for treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;71(6):681-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.62.
- Fava M, Freeman MP, Flynn M, Judge H, Hoeppner BB, Cusin C, Ionescu DF, Mathew SJ, Chang LC, Iosifescu DV, Murrough J, Debattista C, Schatzberg AF, Trivedi MH, Jha MK, Sanacora G, Wilkinson ST, Papakostas GI. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial of intravenous ketamine as adjunctive therapy in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;25(7):1592-1603. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0256-5. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
- Castellanos JP, Woolley C, Bruno KA, Zeidan F, Halberstadt A, Furnish T. Chronic pain and psychedelics: a review and proposed mechanism of action. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Jul;45(7):486-494. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101273. Epub 2020 May 4.
- Le Cornec C, Le Pottier M, Broch H, Marguinaud Tixier A, Rousseau E, Laribi S, Janiere C, Brenckmann V, Guillerm A, Deciron F, Kabbaj A, Jenvrin J, Pere M, Montassier E. Ketamine Compared With Morphine for Out-of-Hospital Analgesia for Patients With Traumatic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2352844. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52844.
- Du R, Han R, Niu K, Xu J, Zhao Z, Lu G, Shang Y. The Multivariate Effect of Ketamine on PTSD: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 9;13:813103. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.813103. eCollection 2022.
- Fremont R, Brown O, Feder A, Murrough J. Ketamine for Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: State of the Field. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2023 Jul;21(3):257-265. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20230006. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
- Romanowski KS, Carson J, Pape K, Bernal E, Sharar S, Wiechman S, Carter D, Liu YM, Nitzschke S, Bhalla P, Litt J, Przkora R, Friedman B, Popiak S, Jeng J, Ryan CM, Joe V. American Burn Association Guidelines on the Management of Acute Pain in the Adult Burn Patient: A Review of the Literature, a Compilation of Expert Opinion, and Next Steps. J Burn Care Res. 2020 Nov 30;41(6):1129-1151. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa119.
- Stojanovic M, Marinkovic M, Milicic B, Stojicic M, Jovic M, Jovanovic M, Isakovic Subotic J, Jurisic M, Karamarkovic M, Dekic A, Radenovic K, Mihaljevic J, Radosavljevic I, Sudecki B, Savic M, Kostic M, Garabinovic Z, Jeremic J. The Role of Ketamine as a Component of Multimodal Analgesia in Burns: A Retrospective Observational Study. J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 29;13(3):764. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030764.
- Lewis BR, Garland EL, Byrne K, Durns T, Hendrick J, Beck A, Thielking P. HOPE: A Pilot Study of Psilocybin Enhanced Group Psychotherapy in Patients With Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Sep;66(3):258-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
- Dakwar E, Levin F, Hart CL, Basaraba C, Choi J, Pavlicova M, Nunes EV. A Single Ketamine Infusion Combined With Motivational Enhancement Therapy for Alcohol Use Disorder: A Randomized Midazolam-Controlled Pilot Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 1;177(2):125-133. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19070684. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
- Dore J, Turnipseed B, Dwyer S, Turnipseed A, Andries J, Ascani G, Monnette C, Huidekoper A, Strauss N, Wolfson P. Ketamine Assisted Psychotherapy (KAP): Patient Demographics, Clinical Data and Outcomes in Three Large Practices Administering Ketamine with Psychotherapy. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2019 Apr-Jun;51(2):189-198. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2019.1587556. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (推定)
一次修了 (推定)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 192679
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。