このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

SnapChole: An International, Time-Bound Prospective Platform Study of Management Strategies and Outcomes in Acute Calculous Cholecystitis (SnapChole)

This study aims to understand how different treatment approaches for acute gallbladder inflammation (acute calculous cholecystitis) affect patient outcomes in real-world hospital settings.

Acute calculous cholecystitis is a common condition that occurs when gallstones block the gallbladder and cause infection or inflammation. In more severe cases, patients may develop organ dysfunction, and doctors must decide quickly how best to treat the condition. Treatment options include early surgery to remove the gallbladder, placement of a drainage tube, or treatment with antibiotics alone. The best approach is not always clear, especially for patients who are older, have other medical conditions, or are very unwell.

This study will collect information from hospitals around the world about how patients with severe gallbladder inflammation are treated as part of their usual care. No treatments are assigned by the study. All decisions are made by the patient's clinical team.

The goal is to compare outcomes between different treatment approaches in patients who could reasonably receive more than one option. The study will examine recovery, survival, need for additional procedures, and time spent in the hospital over 90 days.

The findings are intended to help doctors and patients better understand which treatment strategies may lead to better outcomes in different clinical situations, and to improve decision-making in emergency surgical care.

調査の概要

状態

まだ募集していません

詳細な説明

SnapChole is an international, multicenter, prospective, time-bound observational platform study designed to evaluate management strategies and outcomes in adults with acute calculous cholecystitis. The study focuses on patients with severe disease, defined by the presence of organ dysfunction, in whom treatment decisions are influenced by both patient-level factors and system-level capability.

The study is conducted as a prospective clinical audit using routinely collected data and does not alter patient care. Participating centers enroll consecutive eligible patients during a predefined local accrual window. Data are recorded contemporaneously using standardized case report forms and transferred in deidentified form to a central coordinating database. Follow-up extends to 90 days from the index presentation.

The study architecture separates descriptive benchmarking from causal analysis. The full cohort provides a denominator population for characterization of treatment patterns, timing of interventions, and outcomes across centers and healthcare systems. Within this cohort, prespecified analytic subsets are defined at the point of clinical decision-making (time zero), corresponding to the moment at which the treating team determines that one or more management strategies are feasible.

Comparative analyses are structured to align eligibility, treatment assignment, and follow-up, consistent with a target trial emulation framework applied to observational data. Treatment strategies of interest include early cholecystectomy, gallbladder drainage as an initial approach, and antimicrobial-only management. Analyses are restricted to patients in whom the relevant strategies are simultaneously available, in order to reduce bias arising from differences in clinical eligibility or institutional capability.

Exposure is defined as completion of the assigned management strategy within a prespecified interval following the decision point, reflecting real-world delivery of care. Outcomes include days alive and out of hospital at 90 days, mortality, need for additional interventions, and time to achieved source control.

The study also incorporates complementary analyses, including benchmarking of care pathways, evaluation of patient-centered outcomes, and assessment of factors influencing clinical decision-making. Together, these components are intended to provide a comprehensive understanding of how management strategies are selected and how they relate to outcomes in severe acute calculous cholecystitis.

研究の種類

観察的

入学 (推定)

1500

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究連絡先のバックアップ

研究場所

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia、Pennsylvania、アメリカ、19104

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

サンプリング方法

非確率サンプル

調査対象母集団

Adults with severe acute calculous cholecystitis (Tokyo Guidelines 2018 Grade III) presenting to participating centers and managed under routine clinical care. The population reflects patients in whom treatment decisions are influenced by physiologic severity, comorbidity, and institutional capability. Consecutive eligible patients are enrolled prospectively to define a real-world denominator cohort. Analytic subsets are subsequently defined at the attending surgeon-level decision point to evaluate treatment strategies under conditions in which alternative approaches are simultaneously feasible.

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Presentation with suspected acute calculous cholecystitis
  • Diagnosis confirmed prospectively according to Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) diagnostic criteria
  • Classified as severe (TG18 Grade III) disease based on the presence of organ dysfunction
  • Managed at a participating center during the study accrual period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acalculous cholecystitis
  • Isolated choledocholithiasis or acute cholangitis without cholecystitis
  • Primary gallstone pancreatitis without concomitant acute cholecystitis
  • Elective admission for chronic biliary symptoms
  • Prior cholecystectomy

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

コホートと介入

グループ/コホート
Full Platform Cohort
Consecutive adult patients presenting with acute calculous cholecystitis and meeting Tokyo Guidelines 2018 diagnostic criteria, including those with severe (Grade III) disease. This cohort represents the full prospective denominator population and is used for benchmarking of treatment patterns, timing of interventions, and clinical outcomes under routine care. No restrictions are applied based on treatment strategy eligibility.
Dual-Eligible Cohort (Surgery vs Drainage)
Subset of patients with severe acute calculous cholecystitis (Tokyo Guidelines 2018 Grade III) in whom both early cholecystectomy and gallbladder drainage are judged feasible and available at the attending surgeon-level decision point (time zero). This cohort forms the analytic population for target trial emulation comparing operative source control with drainage-first strategies. Eligibility is defined prior to treatment assignment.
Nonoperative-Eligible Cohort (Drainage vs Antibiotics)
Subset of patients with severe acute calculous cholecystitis (Tokyo Guidelines 2018 Grade III) not selected for immediate surgery but in whom both drainage-first and antimicrobial-only management are feasible at the time of decision. This cohort forms the analytic population for target trial emulation comparing nonoperative management strategies. Eligibility is defined at time zero prior to treatment initiation.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Days alive and out of hospital at 90 days
時間枠:90 days from time zero (attending surgeon-level decision point)
Number of days the participant is alive and not hospitalized during the 90 days following time zero, defined as the attending surgeon-level decision point at which treatment strategy is assigned. Higher values indicate better recovery.
90 days from time zero (attending surgeon-level decision point)

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
All-cause mortality
時間枠:90 days from time zero
Death from any cause within the specified follow-up period after time zero, defined as the attending surgeon-level decision point at which treatment strategy is assigned.
90 days from time zero
Failure of Source Control
時間枠:Within 90 days from time zero
Persistent or recurrent sepsis requiring escalation of intervention, including conversion to surgery, additional drainage procedures, or reoperation following the initial management strategy.
Within 90 days from time zero
Unplanned biliary reintervention
時間枠:within 90 days of time zero
Any unplanned procedural intervention related to biliary disease, including repeat drainage, operative intervention, or endoscopic procedures following the initial management strategy.
within 90 days of time zero
Length of hospital stay
時間枠:From hospital admission to hospital discharge, assessed up to 90 days from time zero
Total duration of the index hospital admission measured from admission to discharge.
From hospital admission to hospital discharge, assessed up to 90 days from time zero
Time to achieved source control
時間枠:From time zero to completion of source-control intervention, assessed up to 90 days
Elapsed time from time zero to completion of the definitive source-control intervention, including surgical or drainage procedures.
From time zero to completion of source-control intervention, assessed up to 90 days

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

捜査官

  • スタディチェア:Gary A Bass, MD, PhD、University of Pennsylvania

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

一般刊行物

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年8月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2027年8月1日

研究の完了 (推定)

2028年1月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年4月23日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年4月29日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年5月5日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年5月5日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年4月29日

最終確認日

2026年4月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

未定

IPD プランの説明

Deidentified individual participant data are collected as part of a prospective international clinical audit and stored in a secure centralized database. Data sharing policies will be developed in accordance with applicable data protection regulations, including GDPR and HIPAA, and will be governed by the study steering committee. Requests for data access may be considered following publication of primary analyses, subject to institutional agreements and ethical approvals.

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する