このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Study on the Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Severe Refractory Primary or Secondary RLS (REST-SCS)

2026年4月30日 更新者:Eva Koetsier、Clinica ARS Medica

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Crossover Study on the Efficacy of Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Severe Refractory Primary or Secondary RLS: the REST-SCS Study

A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Crossover Study to compare the short-efficacy of Burst-SCS with Sham Stimulation, in patients with severe to very severe RLS refractory or intolerant to standard available treatments and/or patients in augmentation, with a two-period-alternating treatment design.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is a common chronic sleep disorder characterized by an irresistible urge to move the legs, often accompanied by unpleasant sensations that worsens during rest, particularly at night, and improves with movement. Affecting around 5% of the population, moderate to severe RLS can lead to insomnia, involuntary leg movements during sleep (PLMS), depression, and increased cardiovascular risk, significantly impacting sleep and quality of life and typically requiring long-term treatment.

While the exact cause of RLS is unknown, genetic factors, dopamine system alterations, iron deficiency in the brain, and opioid pathways are suspected contributors. It's mainly classified as primary (unknown cause), with secondary RLS linked to other conditions.

Current first-line treatments involve dopamine agonists (DAs) and alpha-2-delta ligands, which are generally effective but can have long-term limitations. A major issue with DAs is "augmentation," a worsening of RLS symptoms that often leads to treatment discontinuation. DAs are also less effective for insomnia, often requiring combination with sedatives. Opioids are effective but are second-line due to side effects and addiction risk. Importantly, while DAs help with sensory symptoms, they often don't significantly improve sleep quality.

Emerging as a promising non-pharmacological approach is electrical neuromodulation, particularly spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Case studies have shown that SCS can improve RLS symptoms, reduce PLMS, and enhance sleep quality, although long-term efficacy has been variable. The potential mechanism of SCS involves activating sensory fibers and inhibitory interneurons in the spinal cord, influencing pain pathways, and modulating brain regions involved in motor control and sleep regulation. This multilevel action may explain the potential benefits of SCS across the sensory, sleep, and motor aspects of RLS.

SCS, typically used for chronic intractable pain, is being investigated as a potential treatment for severe RLS due to overlapping characteristics between the two conditions. RLS has a sensory component that can include pain, and there's evidence suggesting a link between RLS and chronic pain based on high comorbidity, similar sensory processing abnormalities, the effectiveness of certain medications (opioids and α2δ ligands), and a shared hyperexcitable state in the central nervous system. Notably, some patients receiving SCS for chronic pain have also experienced improvement in their RLS symptoms.

This double-blind randomized controlled crossover study aims at comparing the short-efficacy of SCS with Sham Stimulation, in patients with primary or secondary intractable severe or very severe RLS, with a two-period-alternating treatment design. Burst SCS, a specific spinal cord stimulation waveform that delivers pulses in clusters separated by brief periods without stimulation, is chosen over other modalities due to its demonstrated ability to modulate both the sensory and affective components of pain and discomfort. Unlike traditional tonic stimulation, Burst SCS delivers stimulation patterns that more closely resemble natural neuronal firing, and may provide effective symptom relief without inducing paresthesia. Although specific evidence for RLS is still limited, Burst SCS has shown promising results in related neuropathic conditions and is currently considered one of the most advanced and effective neuromodulation techniques available.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

15

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

  • 名前:Eva Koetsier, PD MD PhD
  • 電話番号:+41 (0)91 611 64 82
  • メール:eva.koetsier@hin.ch

研究連絡先のバックアップ

  • 名前:Mauro Manconi, MD PhD
  • 電話番号:+41 (0)91 811 68 25
  • メール:mauro.manconi@eoc.ch

研究場所

    • Canton Ticino
      • Gravesano、Canton Ticino、スイス、6929
        • Clinica Ars Medica
        • コンタクト:
      • Lugano、Canton Ticino、スイス、6900
        • Sleep Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland - EOC
        • 副調査官:
          • Sandra Hackethal, MD
        • コンタクト:

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female (all sexes) aged 18 years or older, inclusive;
  • Diagnosis of primary or secondary RLS;
  • Severe to very severe RLS defined as IRLS-RS score > 20;
  • Duration of RSL symptoms ≥ 6 months;
  • Insufficient symptom control achieved by and/or intolerance to established mono- or combination therapy of standard pharmacological treatment incl. patients in augmentation;
  • Stable pharmacologic therapy for RLS for at least 1 month;
  • A stable pattern of neurological symptoms;
  • Patients who are legally competent and able to understand the nature, scope and aim of the clinical trial;
  • Signed informed subject consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity or allergy to the materials of the device;
  • Concomitant use of psychoactive-drugs (e.g. benzodiazepines, antidepressants; wash-out period: at least 7 days or longer depending on half-life);
  • Co-morbid sleep disorders influencing sleep structure and nocturnal motor pattern (e.g. Narcolepsy, REM sleep behaviour disorder etc.);
  • Coagulopathy or oral anticoagulant therapy (except low-dose acetylsalicylic acid) in conditions that do not allow for a temporary discontinuation;
  • Active infection, systemic or localized;
  • Known immune deficiency;
  • Presence of spinal cord or peripheral nerve stimulators;
  • Any disease process or condition that may make the effect of the treatment difficult to evaluate (e.g. cancer with low life expectancy);
  • Severe psychiatric disorders (including substance abuse, major depression, and similar severe disorders known or suspected non-compliance) which could have a negative influence on successful treatment;
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, dementia, etc. of the participant;
  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding;
  • Intention to become pregnant during the course of the study;

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:クロスオーバー割り当て
  • マスキング:4倍

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
プラセボコンパレーター:Treatment phase: Sham-stimulation

After IPG implantation Burst-SCS is turned on in all participants for 2.5. Then, they will again be double-blind randomized to the 2 treatment orders for 2 weeks per stimulation mode (Sham stimulation or SCS) as fcollows:

  • Double-blind randomization to the following alternating treatment modes:
  • 14 days Sham-stimulation + 14 days SCS
  • 14 days SCS + 14r days Sham-stimulation
For the Sham stimulation condition, the amplitude of the spinal cord stimulation will be set to zero.
アクティブコンパレータ:Treatment phase: SCS-stimulation

After IPG implantation Burst-SCS is turned on in all participants for 2.5. Then, they will again be double-blind randomized to the 2 treatment orders for 2 weeks per stimulation mode (Sham stimulation or SCS) as fcollows:

  • Double-blind randomization to the following alternating treatment modes:
  • 14 days Sham-stimulation + 14 days SCS
  • 14 days SCS + 14r days Sham-stimulation
Burst SCS, a specific spinal cord stimulation waveform that delivers pulses in clusters separated by brief periods without stimulation, is chosen over other modalities due to its demonstrated ability to modulate both the sensory and affective components of pain and discomfort. Unlike traditional tonic stimulation, Burst SCS delivers stimulation patterns that more closely resemble natural neuronal firing, and may provide effective symptom relief without inducing paresthesia.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
RLS symptom severity
時間枠:From baseline of the treatment phase to the end of the 2.5 months treatment phase
Change in RLS symptoms and severity as measured by the International RLS-Rating-scale (IRLS-RS) score. The IRLS-RS is a self-administered 10-item questionnaire to assess the severity of sleep disruption and symptoms in RLS patients. It has been validated by the International RLS Study group. Each item is scored from 4 (very severe) to 0 (none). The final score ranges between 0 and 40 and classifies RLS as mild (1-10), moderate (11-20), severe (21-30) and very severe (31-40). A negative change will indicate an improvement in IRLS-RS score and, therefore, in the severity of sleep disruption and symptoms of RLS.
From baseline of the treatment phase to the end of the 2.5 months treatment phase

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Treatment response to SCS in %
時間枠:From baseline of the treatment phase to end of the 2.5 months treatment phase
The percentage of patients with prolonged response to SCS treatment. A responder is defined as a patient with ≥ 50% reduction (partial responder with ≥ 20%-49% reduction) in the IRLS-RS score.
From baseline of the treatment phase to end of the 2.5 months treatment phase
Change in general health quality of life
時間枠:From baseline of the treatment period to the end of the 2.5 months treatment phase
Change in general health quality of life as measured by the EuroQualityOfLife-5 dimensions (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a measure of health-related quality of life that includes five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each with five levels of problems (1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = extreme), describing 3125 separate health states. The EQ-5D-5L also includes a visual analogue scale (VAS), which records the respondent's self-rated health 'today' on a vertical, visual analogue scale, ranging from 0 "worst imaginable health state" to 100 "best imaginable health state" [26]. A total sum score, ranging from 5 to 25, can also be calculated from the EQ-5D-5L data by summing the levels on the five dimensions, whereby 5 represents the best health state (i.e., no problems in all five dimensions, 11111) and 25 represents the worst health state (i.e., severe problems in all five dimensions, 55555).
From baseline of the treatment period to the end of the 2.5 months treatment phase
Change in RLS-related quality of life
時間枠:From baseline of the treatment period to the end of the 2.5 months treatment phase

Change in RLS-related quality of life as measured by the Restless Legs Syndrome Quality of Life Questionnaire (RLSQoL). The RLSQoL is an 18-item self-reported questionnaire that assesses the impact of RLS on daily life, emotional well-being, social life, and work life. Thirteen items are scored on a 5-point scale, the remaining are recorded as either a numerical value or a dichotomous response. Total score range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a better quality of life.

A positive change will indicate an improvement in RLSQoL score and, therefore, in the quality of life of RLS patients.

From baseline of the treatment period to the end of the 2.5 months treatment phase
Change of Total Sleep Time (TST), Sleep Latency (SL) and Sleep Efficacy (SE) acquired by actigraphy
時間枠:From baseline of the treatment period to the end of the 1 month SCS stimulation during the cross-over of the treatment period

Change of Total Sleep Time (TST), Sleep Latency (SL) and Sleep Efficacy (SE) acquired by actigraphy with measurements performed prior to the start of the treatment period (from Day -7 to Day -1), in the respective second week of the two weeks of SCS stimulation during the cross-over of the treatment period. The actigraphy is a standard procedure used to measure day-night motor activity and, thus, evaluate circadian rhythms and their disturbances. A small actigraph unit in a wrist-watch-like package is worn on the wrist for a week to measure gross motor activity and, thus, sleep-wake cycles. The movements of the patients are continually recorded. The following objective actigraphy parameters will be evaluated:

TST = total amount of sleep time scored during the total recording time. SL = time in minutes from lights off, that marks the patient attempts to sleep, until the first epoch scored as sleep.

SE = percentage of total sleep time divided by the time spent in bed

From baseline of the treatment period to the end of the 1 month SCS stimulation during the cross-over of the treatment period
Change of PLMS Index recorded by PSG
時間枠:From baseline of the treatment period to the end of the 1 month SCS stimulation during the cross-over of the treatment period
Change in Periodic limb movements of sleep (PLMS) index from baseline to end of either of the 1 month of stimulation cross-over measured by means of polysomnography recording. The PLMS index is defined as number of PLMS per hour of sleep / total PSG sleep time in minutes.
From baseline of the treatment period to the end of the 1 month SCS stimulation during the cross-over of the treatment period
Difference in RLS symptoms and severity between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation
時間枠:Between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation
Difference in RLS symptoms and severity between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation measured by the IRLS-RS score. The IRLS-RS is a self-administered 10-item questionnaire to assess the severity of sleep disruption and symptoms in RLS patients. It has been validated by the International RLS Study group. Each item is scored from 4 (very severe) to 0 (none). The final score ranges between 0 and 40 and classifies RLS as mild (1-10), moderate (11-20), severe (21-30) and very severe (31-40). A negative change will indicate an improvement in IRLS-RS score and, therefore, in the severity of sleep disruption and symptoms of RLS.
Between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation
Difference in health-related quality of life between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation
時間枠:Between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation
Difference in health-related quality of life between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation measured by the EQ-5D-5L. The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a measure of health-related quality of life that includes five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each with five levels of problems (1 = none, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = extreme), describing 3125 separate health states. The EQ-5D-5L also includes a visual analogue scale (VAS), which records the respondent's self-rated health 'today' on a vertical, visual analogue scale, ranging from 0 "worst imaginable health state" to 100 "best imaginable health state". A total sum score, ranging from 5 to 25, can also be calculated from the EQ-5D-5L data by summing the levels on the five dimensions, whereby 5 represents the best health state and 25 represents the worst health state.
Between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation
Difference in RLS-related quality of life between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation
時間枠:Between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation
Difference in RLS-related quality of life between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation measured by the RLSQoL score. The RLSQoL [23, 24] is an 18-item self-reported questionnaire that assesses the impact of RLS on daily life, emotional well-being, social life, and work life. Thirteen items are scored on a 5-point scale, the remaining are recorded as either a numerical value or a dichotomous response. Total score range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicate a better quality of life. A positive change will indicate an improvement in RLSQoL score and, therefore, in the quality of life of RLS patients.
Between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation
Difference between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation in TST, SL and SE
時間枠:Between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation

Difference between 1month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation in TST, SL and SE acquired by actigraphy. The actigraphy is a standard procedure used to measure day-night motor activity and, thus, evaluate circadian rhythms and their disturbances. A small actigraph unit in a wrist-watch-like package is worn on the wrist for a week to measure gross motor activity and, thus, sleep-wake cycles. The movements of the patients are continually recorded. The following objective actigraphy parameters will be evaluated:

TST = total amount of sleep time scored during the total recording time. SL = time in minutes from lights off, that marks the patient attempts to sleep, until the first epoch scored as sleep.

SE = percentage of total sleep time divided by the time spent in bed

Between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation
Change of sleep parameters recorded by PSG
時間枠:From baselene of the treatment period to the end of the 1 month SCS stimulation during the cross-over of the treatment period.
Change in PSG-related sleep parameters (Total Sleep Time, Sleep Latency, Sleep Efficacy, Number of awakenings, Arousal index) from baseline to end of either of the 1 month of stimulation cross-over measured by means of polysomnography recording. The following PSG-related sleep parameters will be measured: Total Sleep Time (total amount of sleep time scored during the total recording time); Sleep Latency (time in minutes from lights off, that marks the patient attempts to sleep, until the first epoch scored as sleep); Sleep Efficacy (percentage of total sleep time divided by the time spent in bed); Number of awakenings (the total number of awakenings during the total sleep time); Arousal index (the number of arousals per hour of sleep).
From baselene of the treatment period to the end of the 1 month SCS stimulation during the cross-over of the treatment period.
Difference between one month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation in PLMS index, TST, SL, SE, number of awakenings and arousal index
時間枠:Between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation
Difference between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation in PLMS index, TST, SL, SE, number of awakenings and arousal index recorded by PSG. PSG recordings will be carried out in standard sound-attenuated sleep laboratory rooms. The PSG recording may also be performed at home. However, the preparation for the procedure should be carried out at the hospital. Recordings will include electroencephalogram (EEG) (F3, F4, C3, C4, O1, O2 referenced to contralateral mastoid), electroculogram (EOG), electromyogram (EMG) of the submentalis muscle, and EMG of the right and left tibialis anterior muscles. In addition, ECG (CM4 derivation) and sleep respiratory pattern (nasal air flow, thoracic and abdominal respiratory effort, oxygen saturation) will be monitored. Sleep parameters, leg movements, and arousals will be scored according to standardized guidelines. All sleep signals will be stored on hard disk for further analysis.
Between 1 month of SCS vs. Sham stimulation

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年6月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2029年2月14日

研究の完了 (推定)

2029年2月14日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年4月21日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年4月30日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年5月6日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年5月6日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年4月30日

最終確認日

2026年4月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

未定

IPD プランの説明

IPD will be shared upon resonable request by qualified researchers.

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する