このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Acute or Subacute Iliofemoral Vein Thrombosis: Aspiration for Flow Restoration Versus Standard Anticoagulation (IF-FLOW)

2026年5月1日 更新者:Weiwei Wu

Vascular Surgery Department of Beijing Tsinghua ChangGung Hospital

This trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, superiority study. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria for clinical research subjects, 104 patients with acute deep vein thrombosis involving the iliac and femoral veins were recruited. Qualified subjects were randomly (1:1) assigned to either the experimental group or the control group. The experimental group received thrombus aspiration, with or without balloon dilation, stent implantation, and other accompanying surgical treatments, combined with standard anticoagulant therapy, while the control group received only standard anticoagulant therapy. The efficacy and safety of the experimental group in treating acute iliac and femoral vein thrombosis were compared. The main efficacy endpoint of this study is the 24 month postoperative composite endpoint, with the following hierarchical order: 1. in-hospital mortality or treatment upgrade; 2. Recurrent venous thrombosis or newly developed pulmonary embolism of the target lesion within 24 months; 3. Severity of Villalta score at 24 months; 4. Change in VEINES score after 24 months. Simultaneously observe other secondary efficacy endpoints and safety endpoints. Clinical follow-up was conducted before discharge, 30 days after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 12 months after surgery, and 24 months after surgery.

調査の概要

状態

まだ募集していません

詳細な説明

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, superiority clinical trial. A total of 104 patients with acute or subacute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are planned to be enrolled. Participants will receive either thrombus aspiration combined with standard anticoagulant therapy or standard anticoagulant monotherapy according to the randomization principle. The trial aims to verify the efficacy and safety of thrombus aspiration plus standard anticoagulant therapy versus standard anticoagulant therapy alone in the treatment of acute or subacute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

Clinical follow-up assessments will be conducted at pre-discharge, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after the procedure.

The hierarchical composite endpoint at 24 months post-procedure is defined as the primary efficacy endpoint.

Secondary efficacy endpoints include: immediate post-procedure thrombus clearance success rate (intervention group only), 30-day thrombus recurrence rate, Villalta score, VEINES-QOL/Sym quality of life questionnaire for venous insufficiency, and concomitant treatment (excluding treatment escalation).

Secondary safety endpoints include: major bleeding events within 30 days post-procedure, serious adverse events related to aspiration therapy and concomitant endovascular therapy, and serious adverse events other than major bleeding associated with anticoagulant therapy.

The trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thrombus aspiration combined with standard anticoagulant therapy versus standard anticoagulant monotherapy for acute or subacute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

Eligible subjects who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the clinical trial will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either the intervention group (thrombus aspiration + standard anticoagulant therapy) or the control group (standard anticoagulant therapy). Physicians will conduct follow-up of subjects via outpatient visits, telephone interviews, and other means, with simultaneous efficacy and safety evaluations performed throughout the follow-up period.

of primary efficacy.

The hierarchical composite endpoint indicators are, in order: in-hospital death or treatment escalation, recurrent venous thrombosis of the target lesion or new-onset pulmonary embolism within 24 months, severity of the Villalta score at 24 months, and change in the VEINES score at 24 months. Monte Carlo simulation was used for sample size estimation. First, a fixed sample size was assumed, and 3,000 simulations were performed based on this sample size and the estimated parameters (see the table above). Statistical power was calculated as the proportion of rejecting the null hypothesis across the 3,000 simulations, and the assumed sample size was adjusted according to the obtained power.

Assuming the incidence of each hierarchical endpoint in the two groups is as shown in the table above, hypothesis testing was performed for superiority using a Z-test based on normal approximation. The simulation results indicate that with a one-sided α of 0.025, a total sample size of 88 patients (randomly assigned 1:1 to the experimental and control groups) provides approximately 85% statistical power to meet the requirement for superiority inference of the primary endpoint. Accounting for an approximately 15% dropout rate (5% due to withdrawal, loss to follow-up, or missed visits [excluding in-hospital death], and 10% due to missing Villalta and VEINES scores at 24 months), the final sample size is 104 patients.

Determination of Randomization Allocation Subjects were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to the experimental group (thrombus aspiration combined with standard anticoagulant therapy) or the control group (standard anticoagulant therapy).

Stratified block randomization was adopted for group allocation in this trial, with stratification by participating study centers, and random allocation sequences were generated at a 1:1 ratio. After subjects signed the informed consent form, investigators at each sub-center completed randomization allocation via the randomization system.

Treatment Regimen

  1. Treatment Allocation Investigators at each sub-center screened eligible subjects randomly in accordance with the above criteria. Subjects were allocated at a 1:1 ratio to either the experimental group or the control group.

    1.1 Experimental Group (Thrombus Aspiration Therapy) Subjects in the experimental group received thrombus aspiration therapy, and concomitant additional surgical procedures (e.g., catheter-based thrombus aspiration) were allowed based on clinical conditions. All subjects concurrently received standard anticoagulant pharmacotherapy.

    Thrombus Aspiration: Thrombus removal was performed only using thrombus aspiration catheters based on direct negative pressure principle. Combination with other mechanical thrombectomy devices/system principles is prohibited, including but not limited to: stent retrievers, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (e.g., AngioJet catheter), mechanical thrombectomy devices (e.g., Aspirex). Thrombus aspiration was terminated when target vessels achieved complete recanalization with no residual thrombus (thrombus burden score = 0) as assessed by study physicians.

    If significant venous stenosis or occlusion remained after thrombus removal, balloon angioplasty and/or stent implantation were recommended for venous lesions with diameter stenosis ≥50% or lesions presenting obvious collateral circulation on angiography.

    Standard Anticoagulant Pharmacotherapy: All patients in the experimental group received a standard anticoagulant regimen. Coagulation parameters were monitored regularly during treatment to maintain anticoagulant effects within a safe therapeutic window.

    1.2 Control Group (Standard Anticoagulant Pharmacotherapy) Subjects in the control group received standard anticoagulant pharmacotherapy as the conventional treatment for acute or subacute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. Patients in the control group were not allowed to receive thrombus aspiration or any additional volume-reducing surgical interventions, and were managed with medication only.

    Standard Anticoagulant Pharmacotherapy: Control patients were administered standard anticoagulant therapy in accordance with clinical guidelines, including but not limited to low molecular weight heparin, warfarin, or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Coagulation function, hepatic and renal function were closely monitored throughout treatment to ensure the safety of anticoagulation.

    Treatment Duration and Monitoring: Anticoagulant therapy was continued until the predefined study endpoint. Regular clinical examinations including hematological tests and imaging assessments were performed to evaluate therapeutic efficacy and safety profiles.

    1.3 Permitted Adjunct Endovascular Therapy Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filter: Physicians in both experimental and control groups could decide on IVC filter implantation and subsequent retrieval based on clinical judgment and individual patient conditions.

    Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (CDT): For experimental patients receiving thrombus aspiration, intraoperative and postoperative catheter-directed thrombolysis was permitted to optimize thrombectomy efficacy, with a maximum treatment duration within 24 hours after the index procedure.

    Concomitant Additional Surgical Therapy: Experimental patients undergoing thrombus aspiration could receive other concomitant surgical interventions as clinically indicated. Following percutaneous catheter thrombus aspiration, balloon angioplasty and/or stent implantation were recommended for venous lesions with diameter stenosis ≥50% or obvious collateral circulation on angiography.

  2. Treatment During Follow-up

A unified standard anticoagulant regimen was adopted for both the experimental group (thrombus aspiration plus standard anticoagulant therapy) and the control group (standard anticoagulant therapy) throughout the follow-up period. Direct oral anticoagulants are recommended as follows:

Rivaroxaban: Factor Xa inhibitor. Recommended dosage: 15 mg twice daily for 21 days, followed by a maintenance dose of 20 mg once daily.

Dabigatran: Direct thrombin inhibitor. Recommended dosage: 150 mg twice daily. The minimum duration of anticoagulant therapy was 3 months. For special populations, investigators could administer equivalent alternative anticoagulant regimens based on individual patient conditions and the above recommendations.

All implemented anticoagulant strategies, including the specified study regimen, guideline-equivalent alternative regimens, or clinically adjusted individualized anticoagulant schemes, shall be documented in detail in the Case Report Form (CRF).

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

104

段階

  • 適用できない

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-80, gender unrestricted;
  • Diagnosed as acute or subacute proximal deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities through lower extremity venous ultrasound or enhanced CT of the lower extremity veins, with involvement of at least the common iliac vein, external iliac vein, or common femoral vein;
  • The subjects met the criteria for standard anticoagulation therapy combined with thrombus aspiration along with standard anticoagulation therapy;
  • The patient fully understands and voluntarily signs a written informed consent form;
  • Willing and able to comply with all the visit, treatment, and assessment procedures specified in the study protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral deep iliofemoral vein thrombosis;
  • Femoral edema or femoral white swelling;
  • Inferior vena cava thrombosis;
  • History of deep vein thrombosis with a diagnosis of moderate to severe post-thrombotic syndrome;
  • The affected limb has previously had a venous stent implanted;
  • There are anatomical abnormalities affecting the intervention pathway, such as hypoplasia or dysplasia of the inferior vena cava, or other malformations of the iliac or inferior vena cava;
  • Presence of active major bleeding or clinically significant bleeding risk (hemoglobin <80g/L or platelet count <50×109/L);
  • Severe coagulation dysfunction, with an international normalized ratio >1.7;
  • Uncontrolled severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >105 mmHg after medication);
  • Severe renal impairment, with a glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73m²;
  • Any interventional treatment for the target deep vein thrombosis within 30 days prior to enrollment;
  • Female patients in pregnancy or lactation;
  • Known history of allergies to drugs used during the study (such as contrast agents, anticoagulants, etc.);
  • Active malignant tumor;
  • In the judgment of the researchers, there are any other comorbidities, conditions, or poor adherence that may affect the study evaluation or place the patient at high risk.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:処理
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
介入なし:Standard anticoagulation group
only standard anticoagulant therapy
実験的:Thrombosis aspiration group
thrombus aspiration, with or without balloon dilation, stent implantation, and other accompanying surgical treatments, combined with standard anticoagulant therapy
Thrombus aspiration, with or without balloon dilation, stent implantation, and other accompanying surgical treatments, combined with standard anticoagulant therapy

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Postoperative hierarchical composite endpoint at 24 months.
時間枠:24-month post-operation
This trial employs a superiority design using the win ratio method for the hierarchical composite endpoint of primary efficacy. The hierarchical composite endpoint indicators are, in order: in-hospital death or treatment escalation, recurrent venous thrombosis of the target lesion or new-onset pulmonary embolism within 24 months, severity of the Villalta scale at 24 months, and change in the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-Quality of Life/Symptoms (VEINES--QOL/Sym)score at 24 months.
24-month post-operation

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Thrombosis recurrence rate
時間枠:30 days post-operation
Thrombosis recurrence rate
30 days post-operation
Villalta Scale
時間枠:30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively

Villalta Scale 1. Scale Composition

The scale consists of 5 clinical signs and 5 subjective symptoms, each rated from 0 to 3 points:

0 = Absent, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe 1.1 Subjective Symptoms (5 items) Lower limb pain Lower limb aching and distending discomfort Lower limb heaviness Leg cramp Skin pruritus 1.2 Clinical Signs (5 items) Lower limb edema Calf skin pigmentation Subcutaneous lipodermatosclerosis / skin induration Lower limb varicose veins Skin ulceration 2. Scoring Rules Total score = Sum of scores of all 10 items Total score range: 0-30 points 3. Severity Grading Criteria (Clinically accepted, applicable for clinical trial protocol) 0-2 points: No post-thrombotic syndrome (No PTS) 3-4 points: Mild PTS 5-9 points: Moderate PTS

≥ 10 points: Severe PTS Note: If active venous ulceration is present, it is directly classified as severe PTS, regardless of the total score.

30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively
VEINES-QOL/Sym Score
時間枠:30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively

Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-Quality of Life/Symptoms (VEINES-QOL/Sym) Scale (A total of 25 items, each scored from 1 to 5 points).

The 25 items belong to the following categories:

Physical Function Social Life and Daily Activities Work and Housework Emotional and Psychological Status Distress over Lower Limb Appearance

Rating scale:

  1. = No impact at all
  2. = Mild impact
  3. = Moderate impact
  4. = Marked impact
  5. = Severe impact

Scoring Method The total score is the sum of all 25 items, ranging from 25 to 125 points. A higher score indicates a greater impact of venous disease on quality of life.

30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively
Postoperative massive hemorrhage
時間枠:30 days
Postoperative massive hemorrhage
30 days
Immediate Postoperative Thrombus Clearance Success Rate (Experimental Group Only)
時間枠:Immediately after procedure

Proportion of subjects achieving Grade II / Grade III thrombus clearance immediately after procedure among all subjects in the experimental group.

Thrombus Burden Assessment Common iliac vein □Score 0 □Score 1 □Score 2 □Score 3 External iliac vein □Score 0 □Score 1 □Score 2 □Score 3 Common femoral vein □Score 0 □Score 1 □Score 2 □Score 3 Superficial femoral vein (proximal) □Score 0 □Score 1 □Score 2 □Score 3 Superficial femoral vein (distal) □Score 0 □Score 1 □Score 2 □Score 3 Popliteal vein □Score 0 □Score 1 □Score 2 □Score 3 Immediate Postoperative Thrombus Clearance Grade

  • Grade I Clearance (<50%)
  • Grade II Clearance (50%~95%)
  • Grade III Clearance (95%~100%)

Note 1:

Score 0: No residual thrombus (<50% stenosis/occlusion); Score 1: Partial thrombus (50%~90% occlusion); Score 2: Partial occlusion (90%~95% occlusion); Score 3: Complete occlusion (95%~100% occlusion).

Note 2: Thrombus clearance rate formula:

(Preoperative score - Postoperative score) / Preoperative score × 100%

Immediately after procedure

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (推定)

2026年5月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2028年4月30日

研究の完了 (推定)

2030年4月30日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年4月16日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年5月1日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年5月7日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年5月7日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年5月1日

最終確認日

2026年5月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • 26439-4-01

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する