Haplo-Cord HSCT for AML/MDS
Haploidentical Combined With Cord Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Study
This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of haploidentical-cord blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and to analyze the impact of different engraftment patterns (haploidentical engraftment versus cord blood engraftment) on clinical outcomes. By comparing the efficacy of haploidentical-cord blood transplantation in different subtypes of AML and MDS, this research will explore its unique advantages and comparative effectiveness relative to conventional transplantation strategies, so as to provide new evidence for clinical practice.
Specific research objectives I. To evaluate the efficacy of haploidentical-cord blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for AML and high-risk MDS, including the speed of hematopoietic recovery, immune tolerance, and long-term survival rates.
II. To compare the effects of different engraftment patterns (haploidentical engraftment vs. cord blood engraftment) on quality of life, immune tolerance, early complications, and long-term prognosis.
III. To identify the clinical advantages and indications of haploidentical-cord blood transplantation through data analysis, and to provide a theoretical basis for clinical decision-making.
Novelty of the Study I. Innovation in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Infusion Schedule The present study employs a sequential infusion strategy: haploidentical stem cells are infused on Day 0, and umbilical cord blood cells are infused on Day +6 after transplantation.In contrast to the conventional approach used at most domestic and international centers (including the uzhou Protocol), in which both stem cell sources are infused simultaneously on Day 0, the current protocol delays cord blood infusion. This design confers potential advantages for immune reconstitution and long-term cord blood engraftment.
II. Unique Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen
The conditioning regimen used in this study is as follows:
Fludarabine 25 mg/m² for 5 days, Cytarabine 2 mg/m² for 5 days, intravenous Busulfan 3.2 mg/kg for 3 days, ATG 5 mg/m² for 2 days, Melphalan 60 mg/m² for 2 days, and CTX 50.0 mg/kg daily for 2 days.
(For patients in complete remission (CR) with negative MRD before transplantation, Fludarabine and Cytarabine are administered for 3 days instead of 5 days.) Distinct from regimens at other centers, our team administers cyclophosphamide within the critical window after haploidentical stem cell infusion but before cord blood infusion, establishing a novel sequential conditioning model. This approach balances myeloablative intensity and immunomodulation, creating a favorable environment for subsequent long-term cord blood engraftment.
III. Engraftment Outcomes and Clinical Value Preliminary clinical experience demonstrates that haplo-cord sequential transplantation following the FA5Cy2Bu3 conditioning regimen combined with low-dose ATG/PTCY can achieve long-term cord blood engraftment in approximately 50% of patients.
By comparison, other domestic protocols (e.g., the Suzhou Protocol) rarely result in sustained cord blood engraftment.
Achievement of long-term cord blood engraftment is clinically meaningful for reducing relapse rates, lowering the incidence and severity of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and improving patient prognosis. These outcomes represent a key advantage of the present protocol.
調査の概要
状態
詳細な説明
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are common and rapidly progressive malignant hematologic disorders associated with poor prognosis without effective intervention. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only first-line therapeutic strategy with curative potential for long-term remission or even definitive cure. However, the efficacy of conventional transplantation approaches is limited by multiple factors, particularly the management of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and disease recurrence. Balancing the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect against residual leukemia while effectively mitigating GVHD represents an unresolved challenge in current transplantation strategies.
Although an HLA-matched donor is the optimal choice, access to such donors is restricted by time constraints and availability. In recent years, the widespread use of haploidentical donors has dramatically improved transplant accessibility, enabling nearly all patients to identify a suitable donor. China has emerged as a global leader in the development and application of haploidentical transplantation. Nevertheless, the established Beijing Protocol and the Baltimore post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) regimen each have distinct limitations: the former is associated with high engraftment rates and low relapse incidence but a relatively high rate of chronic GVHD (approximately 20%), whereas the latter reduces GVHD risk but carries higher rates of engraftment failure and disease relapse.
Umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) represents an alternative donor source, whose inherent immune properties offer the potential to reduce GVHD while preserving the GVL effect. However, the limited cell dose in single cord blood units results in delayed hematopoietic reconstitution, high infection rates, and elevated early mortality, restricting its broader application in adult patients.
Against this background, transplantation strategies combining the advantages of different donor sources have become a major research focus. The 'haplo-cord hematopoietic stem cell transplantation' strategy, which combines haploidentical peripheral blood stem cells with unrelated umbilical cord blood stem cells, has been proposed. This approach integrates the rapid hematopoietic engraftment of haploidentical stem cells with the immunomodulatory properties of cord blood, thereby accelerating hematopoietic recovery and reducing the risk of acute and chronic GVHD. Furthermore, the incorporation of immunomodulatory agents such as low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) has led to simultaneous control of both transplantation-related mortality and relapse.
Domestic investigators reported that patients with relapsed/refractory acute leukemia (r/r-AL) who received combined haplo-HSCT and UCB-assisted transplantation exhibited superior leukemia-free survival and lower relapse rates compared with haploidentical transplantation alone, with 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, and non-relapse mortality of 35.5%, 35.5%, 25.9%, and 38.0%, respectively. An international study comparing double UCBT (dUCBT) with haplo-cord transplantation for hematologic malignancies demonstrated that haplo-cord transplantation was associated with faster neutrophil and platelet engraftment, lower risks of grade II-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD, reduced relapse risk, and superior GVHD- and relapse-free survival compared with dUCBT.
In recent years, with the increasing incidence of AML and MDS, post-transplant relapse has become the primary obstacle to long-term therapeutic success. International multicenter data indicate that disease relapse remains the leading cause of transplant failure (59% for matched sibling donors vs. 51% for unrelated donors), followed by severe GVHD and infection. Although conventional strategies including re-induction chemotherapy, second transplantation, and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) have been explored, their efficacy is limited by high relapse rates, severe toxicities, and modest survival benefits, failing to meet current clinical needs.
Therefore, the development of novel transplantation models that enhance GVL while controlling GVHD has become an urgent bottleneck to address. Combined donor transplantation strategies represent one promising approach toward this goal. To date, several countries have conducted exploratory studies of the haplo-cord regimen, reporting faster hematopoietic recovery, lower rejection risk, and reduced relapse rates. Multiple centers in China have also initiated clinical validation with encouraging results.
The applicant's research team has developed and implemented a haplo-cord HSCT protocol based on low-dose ATG plus PTCY, with proven safety and efficacy in clinical practice. Compared with conventional haploidentical or single cord blood transplantation, this regimen achieved significantly higher relapse-free survival in patients with relapsed/refractory disease, effectively reduced the incidence of chronic GVHD, and improved quality of life and survival expectancy, with 2-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and GVHD- and relapse-free survival of 64.9%, 64.5%, and 60.8%, respectively. Notably, nearly half of the patients achieved dominant cord blood engraftment, challenging the traditional view that cord blood serves only an auxiliary role.
In the present prospective multicenter cohort study, we aim to further investigate the long-term efficacy of this combined transplantation strategy in patients with AML and high-risk MDS. By comparing immune reconstitution, relapse rates, GVHD, and other prognostic outcomes between cord blood-dominant and haploidentical-dominant engraftment, we intend to define its optimal indications and establish high-level evidence to optimize hematopoietic stem cell transplantation regimens.
This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of haploidentical-cord blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and to analyze the impact of different engraftment patterns (haploidentical engraftment versus cord blood engraftment) on clinical outcomes. By comparing the efficacy of haploidentical-cord blood transplantation in different subtypes of AML and MDS, this research will explore its unique advantages and comparative effectiveness relative to conventional transplantation strategies, so as to provide new evidence for clinical practice.
Specific research objectives: 1. To evaluate the efficacy of haploidentical-cord blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for AML and high-risk MDS, including the speed of hematopoietic recovery, immune tolerance, and long-term survival rates. 2. To compare the effects of different engraftment patterns (haploidentical engraftment vs. cord blood engraftment) on quality of life, immune tolerance, early complications, and long-term prognosis. 3. To identify the clinical advantages and indications of haploidentical-cord blood transplantation through data analysis, and to provide a theoretical basis for clinical decision-making.
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究連絡先
- 名前:Nainong Li, MD
- 電話番号:+86 13365910189
- メール:nainli@aliyun.com
研究連絡先のバックアップ
- 名前:Lihua Wu, MD
- 電話番号:+86 18359180265
- メール:877998423@qq.com
研究場所
-
-
-
Beijing、中国
- まだ募集していません
- Chinese PLA General Hospital
-
コンタクト:
- Wenrong Huang
- 電話番号:+86 010-68182255
- メール:huangwenrong@301hospital.com.cn
-
-
Fujian
-
Fuzhou、Fujian、中国、350001
- 募集
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
-
コンタクト:
- Nainong Li, MD.
- 電話番号:13365910189
- メール:nainli@aliyun.com
-
主任研究者:
- Nainong Li, MD
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou、Guangdong、中国
- まだ募集していません
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
-
コンタクト:
- Suijing Wu
- 電話番号:020-83827812-62110
- メール:suijing_wu5413@163.com
-
-
Sichuan
-
Chengdu、Sichuan、中国
- まだ募集していません
- Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
-
コンタクト:
- Xiaobing Huang
- 電話番号:028-87394103
- メール:huangxiaobing@med.uestc.edu.cn
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 子
- 大人
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 14 and 60 years, with no gender restriction.
- Intermediate- or high-risk AML in first complete remission (CR1).
- AML in second or subsequent complete remission (≥ CR2).
- Relapsed or refractory AML.
- Low-risk AML meeting any of the following: Failure to achieve a ≥3-log reduction in RUNX1::RUNX1T1 transcript level compared with baseline after 2 consolidation cycles, or loss of major molecular remission (MMR) within 6 months; CBFB::MYH11/ABL ratio > 0.1% at any time point after 2 consolidation cycles in patients with CBFB::MYH11-rearranged AML; Presence of D816 KIT mutation in patients with CBFB::MYH11-rearranged AML; Flow cytometry-positive MRD at any time point after 2 consolidation cycles in patients with CEBPA double-mutant AML; Persistently positive MRD after chemotherapy in patients with NPM1-mutated AML.
- Intermediate-2 or high-risk MDS according to the IPSS scoring system.
- Adequate general health status and ability to tolerate hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
- Provision of signed informed consent and willingness to comply with study-required follow-up and examinations.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior history of other hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
- History of ex vivo T-cell-depleted stem cell transplantation.
- Survival duration of less than 1 month after transplantation.
- Severe organ dysfunction, including significant impairment of hepatic, renal, cardiac, or pulmonary function.
- Active severe infection, such as uncontrolled pneumonia, sepsis, or other systemic infections.
- History of severe hypersensitivity reactions to study medications, including cyclophosphamide or anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG).
- Presence of severe psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairment that precludes compliance with study treatment and follow-up.
- Pregnant or lactating women.
- Concurrent malignancy of other organ system.
- Any other medical conditions deemed inappropriate for study participation by the treating investigators.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:処理
- 割り当て:なし
- 介入モデル:単一グループの割り当て
- マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:Haplo-Cord HSCT
|
Patients with disease status in CR and MRD-negative before transplantation received the FA3Cy2Bu3 regimen: Fludarabine 25 mg/m² for 3 days, Cytarabine 2 mg/m² for 3 days, intravenous Busulfan 3.2 mg/kg for 3 days, ATG 5 mg/m² for 2 days, Melphalan 60 mg/m² for 2 days, and CTX 50.0 mg/kg daily for 2 days. All other patients received the FA5Cy2Bu3 regimen: Fludarabine 25 mg/m² for 5 days, Cytarabine 2 mg/m² for 5 days, intravenous Busulfan 3.2 mg/kg for 3 days, ATG 5 mg/m² for 2 days, Melphalan 60 mg/m² for 2 days, and CTX 50.0 mg/kg daily for 2 days. Following the conditioning regimen, patients underwent haploidentical-cord blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells were infused on day 0, and umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem cells were infused on day 6.
薬:Fludarabine, Cytarabine, Busulfan, Antithymocyte Globulin (ATG), Melphalan, Cyclophosphamide (CTX)
Patients with disease status in CR and MRD-negative before transplantation received the FA3Cy2Bu3 regimen: Fludarabine 25 mg/m² for 3 days, Cytarabine 2 mg/m² for 3 days, intravenous Busulfan 3.2 mg/kg for 3 days, ATG 5 mg/m² for 2 days, Melphalan 60 mg/m² for 2 days, and CTX 50.0 mg/kg daily for 2 days. All other patients received the FA5Cy2Bu3 regimen: Fludarabine 25 mg/m² for 5 days, Cytarabine 2 mg/m² for 5 days, intravenous Busulfan 3.2 mg/kg for 3 days, ATG 5 mg/m² for 2 days, Melphalan 60 mg/m² for 2 days, and CTX 50.0 mg/kg daily for 2 days. Following the conditioning regimen, patients underwent haploidentical-cord blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells were infused on day 0, and umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem cells were infused on day 6. |
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|
|
Overall Survival (OS)
時間枠:3 years after transplantation
|
3 years after transplantation
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|
|
Progression-Free Survival(PFS)
時間枠:3 years after transplantation
|
3 years after transplantation
|
|
Disease-Free Survival(DFS)
時間枠:3 years after transplantation
|
3 years after transplantation
|
|
GVHD and Relapse-Free Survival(GRFS)
時間枠:3 years after transplantation
|
3 years after transplantation
|
|
Non-Relapse Mortality(NRM)
時間枠:3 years after transplantation
|
3 years after transplantation
|
協力者と研究者
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration; Fitzmaurice C, Akinyemiju TF, Al Lami FH, Alam T, Alizadeh-Navaei R, Allen C, Alsharif U, Alvis-Guzman N, Amini E, Anderson BO, Aremu O, Artaman A, Asgedom SW, Assadi R, Atey TM, Avila-Burgos L, Awasthi A, Ba Saleem HO, Barac A, Bennett JR, Bensenor IM, Bhakta N, Brenner H, Cahuana-Hurtado L, Castaneda-Orjuela CA, Catala-Lopez F, Choi JJ, Christopher DJ, Chung SC, Curado MP, Dandona L, Dandona R, das Neves J, Dey S, Dharmaratne SD, Doku DT, Driscoll TR, Dubey M, Ebrahimi H, Edessa D, El-Khatib Z, Endries AY, Fischer F, Force LM, Foreman KJ, Gebrehiwot SW, Gopalani SV, Grosso G, Gupta R, Gyawali B, Hamadeh RR, Hamidi S, Harvey J, Hassen HY, Hay RJ, Hay SI, Heibati B, Hiluf MK, Horita N, Hosgood HD, Ilesanmi OS, Innos K, Islami F, Jakovljevic MB, Johnson SC, Jonas JB, Kasaeian A, Kassa TD, Khader YS, Khan EA, Khan G, Khang YH, Khosravi MH, Khubchandani J, Kopec JA, Kumar GA, Kutz M, Lad DP, Lafranconi A, Lan Q, Legesse Y, Leigh J, Linn S, Lunevicius R, Majeed A, Malekzadeh R, Malta DC, Mantovani LG, McMahon BJ, Meier T, Melaku YA, Melku M, Memiah P, Mendoza W, Meretoja TJ, Mezgebe HB, Miller TR, Mohammed S, Mokdad AH, Moosazadeh M, Moraga P, Mousavi SM, Nangia V, Nguyen CT, Nong VM, Ogbo FA, Olagunju AT, Pa M, Park EK, Patel T, Pereira DM, Pishgar F, Postma MJ, Pourmalek F, Qorbani M, Rafay A, Rawaf S, Rawaf DL, Roshandel G, Safiri S, Salimzadeh H, Sanabria JR, Santric Milicevic MM, Sartorius B, Satpathy M, Sepanlou SG, Shackelford KA, Shaikh MA, Sharif-Alhoseini M, She J, Shin MJ, Shiue I, Shrime MG, Sinke AH, Sisay M, Sligar A, Sufiyan MB, Sykes BL, Tabares-Seisdedos R, Tessema GA, Topor-Madry R, Tran TT, Tran BX, Ukwaja KN, Vlassov VV, Vollset SE, Weiderpass E, Williams HC, Yimer NB, Yonemoto N, Younis MZ, Murray CJL, Naghavi M. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;4(11):1553-1568. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2706.
- Li H, Li X, Chen Y, Li D, Chen X, Zhu Z, Wang Y, Huang J, Chen P, Chen Y, Li N. Sequential Transplantation of Haploidentical Stem Cell and Unrelated Cord Blood With Using ATG/PTCY Increases Survival of Relapsed/Refractory Hematologic Malignancies. Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 4;12:733326. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.733326. eCollection 2021.
- Jabbour E, O'Brien S, Konopleva M, Kantarjian H. New insights into the pathophysiology and therapy of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2015 Aug 1;121(15):2517-28. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29383. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
- Terwilliger T, Abdul-Hay M. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2017 update. Blood Cancer J. 2017 Jun 30;7(6):e577. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2017.53.
- Chen EL, Liu HL, Geng LQ, Tang BL, Zhu XY, Yao W, Song KD, Wan X, Sun GY, Qiang P, Fan Q, Zhou ZW, Zheng CC, Zhang L, Zhang XH, Tong J, Sun ZM. [Unrelated cord blood stem cell transplantation for high-risk/refractory childhood acute myeloid leukemia: a clinical analysis of 160 cases]. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jul 14;42(7):549-554. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2021.07.004. Chinese.
- Malard F, Mohty M. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet. 2020 Apr 4;395(10230):1146-1162. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33018-1.
- MacMillan ML, Weisdorf DJ, Brunstein CG, Cao Q, DeFor TE, Verneris MR, Blazar BR, Wagner JE. Acute graft-versus-host disease after unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation: analysis of risk factors. Blood. 2009 Mar 12;113(11):2410-5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-163238. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
- Gomez-Arteaga A, Orfali N, Guarneri D, Cushing MM, Gergis U, Hsu J, Hsu YS, Mayer SA, Phillips AA, Chase SA, Mokhtar AE, Shore TB, Van Besien K. Cord blood transplants supported by unrelated donor CD34+ progenitor cells. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Dec;55(12):2298-2307. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-0959-5. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
- Yun HD, Varma A, Hussain MJ, Nathan S, Brunstein C. Clinical Relevance of Immunobiology in Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation. J Clin Med. 2019 Nov 14;8(11):1968. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111968.
- Hiwarkar P, Qasim W, Ricciardelli I, Gilmour K, Quezada S, Saudemont A, Amrolia P, Veys P. Cord blood T cells mediate enhanced antitumor effects compared with adult peripheral blood T cells. Blood. 2015 Dec 24;126(26):2882-91. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-06-654780. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
- Milano F, Gooley T, Wood B, Woolfrey A, Flowers ME, Doney K, Witherspoon R, Mielcarek M, Deeg JH, Sorror M, Dahlberg A, Sandmaier BM, Salit R, Petersdorf E, Appelbaum FR, Delaney C. Cord-Blood Transplantation in Patients with Minimal Residual Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 8;375(10):944-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602074.
- Massoud R, Gagelmann N, Fritzsche-Friedland U, Zeck G, Heidenreich S, Wolschke C, Ayuk F, Christopeit M, Kroger N. Comparison of immune reconstitution between anti-T-lymphocyte globulin and posttransplant cyclophosphamide as acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in allogeneic myeloablative peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2022 Apr 1;107(4):857-867. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.271445.
- Battipaglia G, Labopin M, Kroger N, Vitek A, Afanasyev B, Hilgendorf I, Schetelig J, Ganser A, Blaise D, Itala-Remes M, Passweg JR, Bonifazi F, Finke J, Ruggeri A, Nagler A, Mohty M. Posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs antithymocyte globulin in HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplantation. Blood. 2019 Sep 12;134(11):892-899. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000487. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
- Lv M, Chang YJ, Huang XJ. Update of the "Beijing Protocol" haplo-identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019 Aug;54(Suppl 2):703-707. doi: 10.1038/s41409-019-0605-2.
- Xu LP, Wu DP, Han MZ, Huang H, Liu QF, Liu DH, Sun ZM, Xia LH, Chen J, Wang HX, Wang C, Li CF, Lai YR, Wang JM, Zhou DB, Chen H, Song YP, Liu T, Liu KY, Huang XJ. A review of hematopoietic cell transplantation in China: data and trends during 2008-2016. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017 Nov;52(11):1512-1518. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2017.59. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
- Apperley J, Niederwieser D, Huang XJ, Nagler A, Fuchs E, Szer J, Kodera Y. Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Global Overview Comparing Asia, the European Union, and the United States. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Jan;22(1):23-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
- Shouval R, Fein JA, Labopin M, Kroger N, Duarte RF, Bader P, Chabannon C, Kuball J, Basak GW, Dufour C, Galimard JE, Polge E, Lankester A, Montoto S, Snowden JA, Styczynski J, Yakoub-Agha I, Mohty M, Nagler A. Outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched and alternative donors: a European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry retrospective analysis. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Nov;6(11):e573-e584. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30158-9. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
- Canaani J, Beohou E, Labopin M, Ghavamzadeh A, Beelen D, Hamladji RM, Niederwieser D, Volin L, Markiewicz M, Arnold R, Mufti G, Ehninger G, Socie G, Kroger N, Mohty M, Nagler A. Trends in patient outcome over the past two decades following allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukaemia: an ALWP/EBMT analysis. J Intern Med. 2019 Apr;285(4):407-418. doi: 10.1111/joim.12854. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (推定)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
- 新生物
- 組織型別の新生物
- 血液疾患
- 白血病、骨髄性
- 骨髄疾患
- 貧血
- 白血病
- 貧血、難治性
- ヘミックおよびリンパ疾患
- 白血病、骨髄性、急性
- 骨髄異形成症候群
- 貧血、難治性、芽球過剰
- アミノ酸、ペプチド、およびタンパク質
- タンパク質
- 硫黄化合物
- 有機化学物質
- 複素環化化合物、1リング
- 複素環化化合物
- 核酸、ヌクレオチド、およびヌクレオシド
- 炭化水素、非環式
- 炭化水素
- 抗体
- 免疫グロブリン
- 免疫タンパク質
- 血液タンパク質
- 血清グロブリン
- グロブリン
- アミノ酸
- シチジン
- ピリミジンヌクレオシド
- ピリミジン
- アルカン
- アルコール
- ブチレングリコール
- グリコール
- メシル酸塩
- アルカンスルホン酸塩
- アルカンスルホン酸
- スルホン酸
- 硫酸
- ホスホルアミドマスタード
- 窒素マスタード化合物
- マスタード化合物
- 炭化水素、ハロゲン化
- ホスホラミド
- 有機リン化合物
- ヌクレオシド
- アラビノヌクレオシド
- 生物学的製品
- 複雑な混合物
- フェニルアラニン
- アミノ酸、芳香
- アミノ酸、周期的
- 免疫血清
- シクロホスファミド
- シタラビン
- メルファラン
- ブスルファン
- 抗リンパ球血清
- フルダラビン
その他の研究ID番号
- 2025XHYG0034-01
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
IPD 共有時間枠
IPD 共有アクセス基準
IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。