Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Monopolar Radiofrequency Device for Mid and Lower Face Rejuvenation
Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Monopolar Radiofrequency Device for Mid and Lower Face Rejuvenation: A Retrospective Pre-Post Comparative Study
調査の概要
詳細な説明
Aging of the face progresses through complex structural changes, including a decrease in skin elasticity, collagen loss, changes in subcutaneous fat distribution, and relaxation of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS). These changes are particularly prominent in the mid and lower face, which has led to the widespread use of non-invasive energy-based lifting and contouring procedures in cosmetic and dermatology clinical practices.
Traditional laser and high-output radiofrequency (RF) based lifting treatments generally deliver brief high-temperature energy (over 70°C) to tissues, inducing protein denaturation and coagulation, followed by collagen remodeling through the wound healing process to achieve long-term effects. Although these treatments can induce relatively rapid clinical changes, side effects such as pain during the procedure, as well as erythema, edema, and blisters, which are associated with thermal damage, have been reported.
To address these limitations, there has been increasing interest in low-temperature-maintaining RF treatments that minimize tissue degeneration while inducing biological responses. In particular, RF stimulation in the range of 43-45°C is known to be a temperature range that does not induce tissue coagulation and is believed to trigger reactions related to cellular metabolic activation and programmed cell death (apoptosis), rather than necrosis-based damage with accompanying acute inflammatory responses. This approach has advantages, including relatively less pain, shorter recovery times, and the possibility of repeated treatments.
Recent studies have also reported that TRPV1 receptors, activated by thermal stimulation above 43°C, may be associated not only with pain transmission but also with the activation of fibroblasts, regulation of collagen and extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis, and regulation of adipocyte metabolism. Some experimental studies have observed an increase in fibroblast proliferation and ECM production when RF energy was applied to maintain a temperature range of 43-45°C for a certain period. However, this evidence has been largely limited to studies focusing on the skin layer, and there is still limited systematic human research on the clinical efficacy and safety of RF treatments that simultaneously stimulate both the skin and subcutaneous fat layers.
NeoSculpt is a monopolar RF system designed with a multi-channel handpiece structure using different frequencies (1 MHz and 2 MHz) to deliver energy progressively to the dermal-SMAS interface and subcutaneous fat layers. Through a low-temperature-maintaining RF protocol, it is expected to achieve mid- and lower-face lifting and contouring effects. However, objective data regarding the efficacy, safety, and clinical changes associated with the use of this device in actual clinical settings are not yet sufficiently accumulated.
This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of mid- and lower-face lifting and contouring treatments using the NeoSculpt monopolar RF device through a retrospective pre-post comparative analysis utilizing existing clinical records.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Gyeonggi-do
-
Seongnam-si、Gyeonggi-do、韓国、13620
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 子
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
サンプリング方法
調査対象母集団
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients who have undergone mid- and lower-face lifting and contouring treatments using NeoSculpt RF
- Cases where pre- and post-treatment evaluation data are available after completing 3 sessions
Exclusion Criteria:
- Missing key evaluation data
- Cases where follow-up observations were not conducted after treatment
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
コホートと介入
グループ/コホート |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
20 patients
This study is an observational, retrospective cohort study.
Considering the number of patients available at a single institution and the feasibility of the study, a total of 20 participants were selected.
This is considered the minimum number of subjects required to perform the pre-post comparative analysis planned in this study and to assess the clinical trends and safety of mid- and lower-face lifting and contouring treatments.
In this study, personally identifiable information (such as name, resident registration number, etc.) will not be collected, and research data will be anonymized and analyzed using a study ID number.
All data will be managed by the principal investigator, and use for purposes other than the research is restricted.
|
This is a retrospective observational study analyzing existing medical records of patients who received NeoSculpt monopolar radiofrequency treatment as part of routine clinical care at a private dermatology clinic.
The investigator did not assign or administer any intervention as part of this study.
All clinical photographs, 3D photographic assessments, and ultrasound measurements were obtained during routine clinical visits prior to study initiation.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinician-Assessed Improvement in Standardized Clinical Photographs
時間枠:baseline, 1month, 2month, 3month, 6month
|
Two blinded dermatologists independently evaluate standardized clinical photographs taken before and after treatment.
Improvement is rated on a 5-point scale (0 = no improvement, 1 = minimal improvement [1-25%], 2 = moderate improvement [26-50%], 3 = marked improvement [51-75%], 4 = excellent improvement [>75%]).
Higher scores indicate greater improvement.
|
baseline, 1month, 2month, 3month, 6month
|
|
Change in Mid- and Lower-Face Volume Measured by 3D Photographic System
時間枠:Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6
|
Facial volume in the mid-cheek, jawline, and nasolabial fold regions is measured using a 3D photographic system.
Change from baseline is reported in cubic millimeters (mm³).
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6
|
|
Change in Skin Layer Collagen Thickness Measured by Ultrasound
時間枠:Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6
|
Collagen thickness of the dermal layer is measured using high-frequency ultrasound imaging.
Change from baseline is reported in millimeters (mm).
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6
|
|
Change in SMAS-Adjacent Adipose Tissue Thickness Measured by Ultrasound
時間枠:Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6
|
Thickness of adipose tissue adjacent to the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) is measured using high-frequency ultrasound imaging.
Change from baseline is reported in millimeters (mm).
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6
|
|
Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score for Overall Facial Improvement
時間枠:Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6
|
Three independent, blinded dermatologists evaluate overall facial improvement using the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale.
Scores range from 0 to 4 (0 = no improvement, 1 = minimal improvement [1-25%], 2 = moderate improvement [26-50%], 3 = marked improvement [51-75%], 4 = excellent improvement [>75%]).
Higher scores indicate greater improvement.
The mean score across three evaluators is reported.
|
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6
|
|
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
時間枠:baseline, 1month, 2month, 3month, 6month
|
|
baseline, 1month, 2month, 3month, 6month
|
|
Duration and Resolution of Adverse Events
時間枠:Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6
|
Description: For participants who experience adverse events, the duration (in days) from onset to resolution is recorded. Clinical course and any management performed are documented at each follow-up visit. Unit of Measure: Days |
Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient-Reported Pain Score During Treatment
時間枠:Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
Patients rate procedural pain using a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain).
Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
|
Month 1, Month 2, Month 3
|
|
Patient-Reported Overall Satisfaction Score
時間枠:Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6
|
Patients rate overall satisfaction with treatment outcome using a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10 (0 = completely dissatisfied, 10 = completely satisfied).
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
|
Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6
|
協力者と研究者
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。