Adjunctive Group Psychotherapy for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Pilot Feasibility Study Comparing Two Interventions
Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by eczematous skin lesions and pruritus. This partially randomized, three-arm pilot feasibility study was designed to evaluate two adjunctive group psychotherapy interventions in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis receiving standard dermatological care.
Participants were assigned to one of three study arms: treatment as usual alone, treatment as usual plus atopic dermatitis-specific cognitive behavioural and schema mode group therapy, or treatment as usual plus stress management and resilience group therapy.
The psychotherapy interventions consisted of weekly group sessions during a 14-week intervention period. Assessments were scheduled at baseline, post-intervention at week 14, and six-month follow-up. Disease severity was assessed using the Eczema Area and Severity Index and SCORing Atopic Dermatitis.
調査の概要
状態
条件
詳細な説明
This was a partially randomized, three-arm pilot feasibility study conducted in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. The study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of delivering two adjunctive group psychotherapy interventions in addition to standard dermatological care and to collect prespecified clinical, psychological, and feasibility-related outcomes.
Participants were recruited from an outpatient dermatology service. Eligible participants were adults with atopic dermatitis and baseline disease severity consistent with moderate-to-severe disease. All participants received treatment as usual, consisting of standard dermatological care according to clinical indication.
Participants were assigned to one of three study arms: treatment as usual alone; treatment as usual plus atopic dermatitis-specific cognitive behavioural and schema mode group therapy; or treatment as usual plus stress management and resilience group therapy. Participants allocated to the two psychotherapy arms were randomized between the two active group interventions. Assignment to the treatment-as-usual-only arm was non-randomized. The study was not blinded.
Both psychotherapy interventions consisted of 14 weekly group sessions. The atopic dermatitis-specific cognitive behavioural and schema mode group therapy intervention addressed disease-related psychological and behavioural processes, including itch-related coping, scratching behaviour, emotion regulation, stigma-related experiences, and schema mode work relevant to chronic skin disease. The stress management and resilience group therapy intervention addressed stress management, emotion regulation, interpersonal functioning, coping skills, and resilience.
Assessments were scheduled at baseline, post-intervention at week 14, and six-month follow-up. Disease severity was assessed using the Eczema Area and Severity Index and SCORing Atopic Dermatitis. Additional psychological and feasibility-related measures were collected as specified in the outcome measure section of the record.
The study was conducted with written informed consent from participants and approval from the relevant ethics committee.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
-
Budapest、ハンガリー、1083
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older
- Clinical diagnosis of atopic dermatitis
- Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, defined as SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score of 25 or higher
- Suitability for group psychotherapy confirmed through a secondary clinical interview with two psychotherapists
- Willingness to participate in the study and provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Mild atopic dermatitis, defined as SCORAD score below 25
- Other chronic inflammatory or infectious skin disease
- Ongoing systemic immunosuppressive or biological treatment
- Psychotic disorder
- Drug dependence
- Pregnancy
- Not suitable for group psychotherapy based on the secondary clinical interview with two psychotherapists
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：処理
- 割り当て：非ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
アクティブコンパレータ：TAU (standard dermatological treatment)
All groups received TAU as prescribed by a consultant dermatologist.
This included emollients, topical corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors, and antihistamines in line with European AD treatment guidelines.
|
All groups received TAU as prescribed by a consultant dermatologist.
This included emollients, topical corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors, and antihistamines in line with European AD treatment guidelines.
|
|
実験的：TAU + Atopic Dermatitis-specific Cognitive Behavioural and Schema Mode Group Therapy
The ADCBST consisted of 14 weekly, 2.5-hour group sessions.
Therapy content was based on a structured manual combining schema mode therapy with atopic dermatitis-specific cognitive-behavioural strategies.
Sessions included psychoeducation, imagery rescripting, cognitive restructuring, behavioural experiments, and role-play exercises.
Therapy was delivered by two trained psychotherapists.
|
All groups received TAU as prescribed by a consultant dermatologist.
This included emollients, topical corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors, and antihistamines in line with European AD treatment guidelines.
The ADCBST consisted of 14 weekly, 2.5-hour group sessions.
Therapy content was based on a structured manual combining schema mode therapy with atopic dermatitis-specific cognitive-behavioural strategies.
Sessions included psychoeducation, imagery rescripting, cognitive restructuring, behavioural experiments, and role-play exercises.
Therapy was delivered by two trained psychotherapists.
|
|
アクティブコンパレータ：Stress Management and Resilience Group Therapy (SRCST)
The SRCST consisted of 14 weekly, 2.5-hour group sessions.
The SRCST intervention followed the Hungarian-adapted Williams LifeSkills protocol.
Sessions addressed emotion-focused and problem-focused coping, communication, empathy, and resilience.
Delivery was based on Carl Rogers' unconditional acceptance framework and Lewin's T-group method.
The 14 weekly sessions were led by a consultant psychologist and a psychology assistant.
|
All groups received TAU as prescribed by a consultant dermatologist.
This included emollients, topical corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors, and antihistamines in line with European AD treatment guidelines.
The SRCST consisted of 14 weekly, 2.5-hour group sessions.
The SRCST intervention followed the Hungarian-adapted Williams LifeSkills protocol.
Sessions addressed emotion-focused and problem-focused coping, communication, empathy, and resilience.
Delivery was based on Carl Rogers' unconditional acceptance framework and Lewin's T-group method.
The 14 weekly sessions were led by a consultant psychologist and a psychology assistant.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 14
時間枠：Baseline and week 14
|
The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a clinician-rated measure of objective atopic dermatitis severity.
It evaluates erythema, excoriation, edema/papulation, and lichenification across four anatomical regions: head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities.
Total EASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
The outcome measure is the change in total EASI score from baseline to post-intervention assessment at week 14.
A negative change indicates improvement.
|
Baseline and week 14
|
|
Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 14
時間枠：Baseline and week 14
|
The SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index is a clinician-rated and patient-informed measure of atopic dermatitis severity.
It includes assessment of disease extent, intensity of skin signs, and subjective symptoms including itching and sleep disturbance.
Total SCORAD scores range from 0 to 103, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
The outcome measure is the change in total SCORAD score from baseline to post-intervention assessment at week 14.
A negative change indicates improvement.
|
Baseline and week 14
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Six-Month Follow-Up
時間枠：Baseline and six-month follow-up
|
The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a clinician-rated measure of objective atopic dermatitis severity.
Total EASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
The outcome measure is the change in total EASI score from baseline to six-month follow-up.
A negative change indicates improvement.
|
Baseline and six-month follow-up
|
|
Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Six-Month Follow-Up
時間枠：Baseline and six-month follow-up
|
The SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index includes assessment of disease extent, intensity of skin signs, and subjective symptoms including itching and sleep disturbance.
Total SCORAD scores range from 0 to 103, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
The outcome measure is the change in total SCORAD score from baseline to six-month follow-up.
A negative change indicates improvement.
|
Baseline and six-month follow-up
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in EASI Score at Week 14
時間枠：Baseline and week 14
|
Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as a reduction of at least 6.6 points in total EASI score from baseline to week 14.
The outcome measure is the number of participants meeting this responder criterion.
|
Baseline and week 14
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in SCORAD Score at Week 14
時間枠：Baseline and week 14
|
Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as a reduction of at least 8.7 points in total SCORAD score from baseline to week 14.
The outcome measure is the number of participants meeting this responder criterion.
|
Baseline and week 14
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in EASI Score at Six-Month Follow-Up
時間枠：Baseline and six-month follow-up
|
Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as a reduction of at least 6.6 points in total EASI score from baseline to six-month follow-up.
The outcome measure is the number of participants meeting this responder criterion.
|
Baseline and six-month follow-up
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Improvement in SCORAD Score at Six-Month Follow-Up
時間枠：Baseline and six-month follow-up
|
Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as a reduction of at least 8.7 points in total SCORAD score from baseline to six-month follow-up.
The outcome measure is the number of participants meeting this responder criterion.
|
Baseline and six-month follow-up
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
- ORG-100023482
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
IPD 共有時間枠
IPD 共有アクセス基準
IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。