このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Effectiveness and Implementation of a Clinical Pain Management Dashboard for the NICU

2026年6月1日 更新者:Robert Flint、Erasmus Medical Center

A Hybrid Effectiveness-implementation Study on the Implementation of a Clinical Pain Management Dashboard for the NICU

This study protocol describes a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study evaluating a clinical decision support dashboard for neonatal pain management in a tertiary NICU. Using a pre- and post-implementation design, the study assesses whether the dashboard reduces the duration of inadequately managed neonatal discomfort during the first seven days of admission, while concurrently evaluating implementation outcomes such as acceptability, appropriateness, fidelity, and penetration. Quantitative EHR- and dashboard-derived data are complemented by qualitative interviews and observations to provide a comprehensive evaluation of both clinical impact and implementation processes.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

This protocol outlines a single-center, type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study evaluating an in-house developed clinical decision support dashboard designed to optimize pain management in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). The study is conducted at a level III-IV NICU and follows a pre-implementation (retrospective), mid-implementation, buffer, and post-implementation (prospective) design over approximately 26 months.

The primary effectiveness objective is to determine whether implementation of the dashboard reduces the duration of inadequately managed neonatal discomfort during the first seven days of admission. Discomfort is operationalized as the cumulative duration a neonate is classified as "red" by the dashboard prioritization algorithm, indicating the need for immediate clinical attention. Pre-implementation "red" classifications are generated retrospectively from electronic health record data using the same algorithmic criteria applied prospectively post-implementation.

The secondary objective is to evaluate the implementation process of the dashboard within routine NICU workflows. Implementation outcomes, based on the framework of Proctor et al., include acceptability, appropriateness, fidelity (implementation and effectiveness), and penetration. These outcomes are assessed using a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative measures such as dashboard use metrics, prescribing patterns, and timing of pain assessments with qualitative data from semi-structured interviews and observations involving healthcare professionals and parents.

The comfort-dashboard is implemented using a phased ward-based approach supported by targeted training, local champions, and ongoing facilitation. The study poses minimal risk, as the dashboard supports but does not replace clinical decision-making, and no changes are made to core algorithm logic or outcome definitions during the study. By integrating effectiveness and implementation evaluations, this protocol aims to generate clinically relevant evidence while supporting reproducibility, transparency, and future scalability of digital decision support tools in neonatal care.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

1250

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

      • Rotterdam、オランダ
        • Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's hospital

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 子
  • 大人
  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

Primary endpoint - Effectiveness evaluation (neonates):

  • Admitted to the NICU of Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital during either the pre-implementation or post-implementation phase
  • Admitted and discharged during the respective phase
  • Parental consent for use of medical information provided upon admission

Secondary endpoints - Implementation process evaluation (healthcare professionals):

  • Physician, nurse, or nurse specialist working in the NICU during the study period who has been exposed to TMD-C
  • Management staff who has been exposed to TMD-C

Secondary endpoints - Implementation process evaluation (parents):

- Parent or guardian of an included neonate who was exposed to the dashboard during the samenzorgvisite (family-integrated ward round)

Primary endpoint - Effectiveness evaluation (neonates):

  • Readmitted to the NICU during the same study phase
  • Admitted to the NICU for less than 24 hours
  • Discharged or transferred before 7 days of admission without complete pain management data available

Secondary endpoints - Implementation process evaluation:

- None

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:他の
  • 割り当て:非ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
介入なし:Pre-implementation group (patients)
neonates admitted to the NICU BEFORE implementation of the dashboard.
実験的:Post-implementation group (patients)
neonates admitted to the NICU AFTER implementation of the dashboard.
The comfort-dashboard designed to assist healthcare professionals in managing neonatal pain within the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). The software aggregates and visualizes patient-specific data from connected systems, providing near-real-time metrics, patient prioritization, and clinical decision support.
他の:Interviews - parents/guardians
Parents/guardians of patients admitted to the NICU during the post-implementation period.
The comfort-dashboard designed to assist healthcare professionals in managing neonatal pain within the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). The software aggregates and visualizes patient-specific data from connected systems, providing near-real-time metrics, patient prioritization, and clinical decision support.
他の:Interviews/observations - Healthcare professionals.
The healthcare professionals involved in the care of neonates AFTER implementation of the dashboard.
The comfort-dashboard designed to assist healthcare professionals in managing neonatal pain within the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). The software aggregates and visualizes patient-specific data from connected systems, providing near-real-time metrics, patient prioritization, and clinical decision support.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Main study parameter/endpoint - Effectiveness evaluation
時間枠:Days 1-7 of NICU admission, assessed through study completion (approximately 13 months post go-live, November 2026).
For the primary aim of our study, we will assess the effectiveness of the dashboard in improving the comfort of patients admitted to the NICU, defined by the difference in the duration of inadequately managed discomfort in neonates during the first seven days of admission. Here, the duration of inadequately managed discomfort is measured by the duration a patient has a 'red' status, as classified by the classification algorithm.
Days 1-7 of NICU admission, assessed through study completion (approximately 13 months post go-live, November 2026).

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
System Usability Scale (SUS) score among healthcare professionals
時間枠:At 6 months post go-live (week 32-35)
The SUS is a 10-item standardized questionnaire administered to healthcare professionals. Each item is rated 1-5. Odd-numbered item scores are reversed; all scores are summed and multiplied by 2.5 to yield a normalized score (range 0-100; higher = better usability). The SUS score is interpreted as a percentile rank.
At 6 months post go-live (week 32-35)
Qualitative assessment of acceptability of the dashboard among healthcare professionals and parents
時間枠:At 6 months post go-live (week 32-35)
Semi-structured interviews exploring perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation, usefulness, ease of use, and overall satisfaction with TMD-C, conducted with healthcare professionals and parents. Analysis uses direct content analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
At 6 months post go-live (week 32-35)
Qualitative assessment of appropriateness of the implementation strategies within NICU workflows
時間枠:Through study completion, ~13 months
Perceived fit, relevance, and compatibility of the chosen implementation strategies, assessed through semi-structured interviews and systematic observations with healthcare professionals, analyzed using CFIR constructs.
Through study completion, ~13 months
Proportion of healthcare professionals attending training sessions (%)
時間枠:Weeks 0-7 (mid-implementation phase)
Implementation fidelity measure: the proportion of healthcare professionals working in the NICU during the study period who attended at least one TMD-C training session.
Weeks 0-7 (mid-implementation phase)
Use of loading doses at therapy initiation and dose-escalation (n; %)
時間枠:Days 1-7 of admission through study completion, ~13 months
The difference in the proportion of therapy initiations and dose-escalation events accompanied by a loading dose within the protocol-specified timeframe, comparing pre- and post-implementation phases, stratified by moment (initiation vs. escalation).
Days 1-7 of admission through study completion, ~13 months
Continuous infusion duration in patients without discomfort (minutes)
時間枠:Days 1-7 of admission, through study completion (approximately 13 months post go-live)
The difference in the duration of continuous analgesic infusion in neonates classified as not experiencing discomfort, comparing pre- and post-implementation phases, stratified by drug and relevant patient characteristics.
Days 1-7 of admission, through study completion (approximately 13 months post go-live)
Dose-escalation titration step size (mg/kg/hr)
時間枠:Days 1-7 of admission, through study completion (approximately 13 months post go-live)
The difference in starting dosage and height of subsequent dose escalation steps surrounding dose-escalation events, comparing pre- and post-implementation phases, stratified by drug and relevant patient characteristics.
Days 1-7 of admission, through study completion (approximately 13 months post go-live)
Duration of oversedation (minutes)
時間枠:Days 1-7 of admission, through study completion (approximately 13 months post go-live)
The difference in the cumulative duration a patient is classified as oversedated, comparing pre- and post-implementation phases.
Days 1-7 of admission, through study completion (approximately 13 months post go-live)
Proportion of timely pain measurements following key therapy events (%)
時間枠:Days 1-7 of admission, through study completion (approximately 13 months post go-live)
The difference in the proportion of pain measurements conducted within the protocol-specified timeframe after therapy initiation, dose-escalation, dose-decrease, and therapy discontinuation, comparing pre- and post-implementation phases, stratified by relevant patient characteristics.
Days 1-7 of admission, through study completion (approximately 13 months post go-live)
Number of dashboard accesses per morning round (n)
時間枠:Through study completion, approximately 13 months post go-live
The frequency of TMD-C access during morning rounds, used as a measure of penetration - the extent to which dashboard use has become part of routine NICU workflow.
Through study completion, approximately 13 months post go-live

その他の成果指標

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Sex distribution of included neonates (n; %)
時間枠:Through study completion, ~ 13 months
Descriptive statistic for included neonates. Reported for both pre- and post-implementation cohorts.
Through study completion, ~ 13 months
Birth weight of included neonates (grams)
時間枠:Through study completion, ~ 13 months
Descriptive statistic for included neonates. Expressed as mean (±SD) or median (±IQR) depending on data distribution. Reported for both pre- and post-implementation cohorts.
Through study completion, ~ 13 months
Gestational age of included neonates (weeks)
時間枠:Through study completion, ~ 13 months
Descriptive statistic for included neonates. Expressed as mean (±SD) or median (±IQR) depending on data distribution. Reported for both pre- and post-implementation cohorts.
Through study completion, ~ 13 months
Profession of healthcare professionals (n; %)
時間枠:Through study completion, ~ 13 months
Descriptive statistic for healthcare professionals participating in the implementation evaluation. Categories include physician, nurse, nurse specialist, and management. Reported for the post-implementation cohort.
Through study completion, ~ 13 months
Years of clinical experience of healthcare professionals (years)
時間枠:Through study completion, ~ 13 months
Descriptive statistic for healthcare professionals. Expressed as mean (±SD) or median (±IQR) depending on data distribution. Reported for the post-implementation cohort.
Through study completion, ~ 13 months

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2025年10月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2026年11月30日

研究の完了 (推定)

2026年11月30日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年4月7日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年6月1日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年6月5日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年6月5日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年6月1日

最終確認日

2026年6月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

いいえ

IPD プランの説明

Individual participant data will not be proactively shared at this stage. Sharing will be reconsidered after study completion and publication. Requests for de-identified data may be considered on a case-by-case basis by the principal investigator.

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する